Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: National Association of Wheat Growers

2005 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
Neil Abercrombie 62%
Gary Ackerman 37%
Daniel Akaka, Sr. 50%
Todd Akin 100%
Rodney Alexander 100%
Wayne Allard 100%
Thomas Allen 37%
Rob Andrews 37%
Joe Baca, Sr. 62%
Spencer Bachus 100%
Brian Baird 50%
Richard Hugh Baker 100%
J. Gresham Barrett 100%
John Barrow 62%
Roscoe Bartlett 87%
Max Baucus 50%
Evan Bayh 50%
Melissa Bean 62%
Bob Bennett 100%
Shelley Berkley 50%
Howard Berman 37%
Marion Berry 75%
Judy Biggert 75%
Jeff Bingaman 100%
Tim Bishop 37%
Kit Bond 100%
Jo Bonner, Jr. 87%
Mary Bono Mack 100%
Dan Boren 87%
Leonard Boswell 87%
Rick Boucher 87%
Allen Boyd, Jr. 62%
Henry Brown, Jr. 100%
Ginny Brown-Waite 87%
Jim Bunning 100%
Dan Burton 100%
Steve Buyer 100%
Robert Byrd 50%
Dave Camp 100%
Chris Cannon 100%
Eric Cantor 100%
Dennis Cardoza 87%
Russ Carnahan 37%
Julia Carson 42%
Mike Castle 87%
Saxby Chambliss 100%
Ben Chandler III 50%
Hillary Clinton 25%
Howard Coble 75%
Thomas Coburn 100%
Norm Coleman 100%
Kent Conrad 50%
Jerry Costello 75%
Larry Craig 50%
Robert Cramer 75%
Barbara Cubin 85%
Artur Davis 62%
Geoff Davis 100%
Jo Ann Davis 71%
Lincoln Davis 87%
Thomas Davis III 75%
Bill Delahunt 28%
James DeMint 100%
Lincoln Diaz-Balart 87%
Norm Dicks 62%
John Dingell 62%
Chris Dodd 25%
Elizabeth Dole 100%
Pete Domenici, Jr. 100%
John Doolittle 100%
Byron Dorgan 50%
Thelma Drake 100%
David Dreier 100%
Chet Edwards 75%
Vern Ehlers 87%
Jo Ann Emerson 100%
Philip English 87%
John Ensign 100%
Bob Etheridge 75%
Terry Everett 100%
Tom Feeney 87%
Russ Feingold 25%
Michael Ferguson 87%
Bob Filner 50%
Vito Fossella, Jr. 87%
Barney Frank 50%
Elton Gallegly 100%
Jim Gerlach 100%
Wayne Gilchrest 100%
Paul Gillmor 85%
Phil Gingrey 100%
Charlie Gonzalez 62%
Virgil Goode, Jr. 87%
Bart Gordon 85%
Judd Gregg 50%
Ralph Hall 100%
Tom Harkin 50%
Jane Harman 37%
J. Dennis Hastert 12%
Doc Hastings 100%
Robert Hayes 100%
Wally Herger, Jr. 100%
Stephanie Herseth Sandlin 66%
Maurice Hinchey 42%
David Lee Hobson 100%
Pete Hoekstra 100%
Thomas Holden 50%
Rush Holt, Jr. 37%
Darlene Hooley 50%
Kenny Hulshof 100%
Duncan Hunter 87%
Kay Hutchison 100%
Bob Inglis, Sr. 87%
Daniel Inouye 50%
Jesse Jackson, Jr. 37%
William Jefferson 75%
Tim Johnson 100%
Timothy Johnson 50%
Paul Kanjorski 50%
Ric Keller 87%
Edward Kennedy, Sr. 25%
Patrick Kennedy 50%
Dale Kildee 37%
Carolyn Kilpatrick 28%
Jack Kingston 100%
Joseph Knollenberg 100%
Herb Kohl 50%
Dennis Kucinich 25%
John Kuhl, Jr. 100%
Jon Kyl 50%
Ray LaHood 100%
Mary Landrieu 50%
Tom Lantos 37%
Tom Latham 100%
Steve LaTourette 75%
Frank Lautenberg 25%
Carl Levin 50%
Jerry Lewis 100%
Ron Lewis 100%
Joe Lieberman 100%
Blanche Lincoln 100%
John Linder 100%
Trent Lott, Sr. 100%
Dick Lugar 100%
Dan Lungren 100%
Connie Mack IV 75%
Don Manzullo 100%
Jim Marshall 75%
Melquiades Martinez 75%
Jim Matheson 87%
Carolyn McCarthy 50%
Thaddeus McCotter 62%
James McCrery III 100%
John McHugh 87%
Mike McIntyre 85%
Buck McKeon 100%
Michael McNulty 37%
Martin Meehan 37%
Kendrick Meek, Sr. 37%
Charlie Melancon, Sr. 87%
Mike Michaud 37%
Juanita Millender-McDonald 37%
Gary Miller 87%
George Miller 28%
Brad Miller 37%
Alan Mollohan 62%
Dennis Moore 87%
Jim Moran, Jr. 50%
Jack Murtha 50%
Marilyn Musgrave 100%
Sue Myrick 100%
Ben Nelson 100%
Jim Oberstar 42%
Dave Obey 50%
John Olver 37%
Solomon Ortiz, Sr. 75%
Ed Pastor 37%
Ron Paul 42%
Donald Payne 50%
John Peterson 100%
Tom Petri 75%
Charles Pickering, Jr. 100%
Todd Platts 100%
Earl Pomeroy 75%
Jon Porter, Sr. 100%
Deborah Pryce 100%
Mark Pryor 100%
George Radanovich 100%
Nick Rahall II 62%
James Ramstad 100%
Ralph Regula 100%
Denny Rehberg 87%
Richard Renzi 100%
Silvestre Reyes 62%
Thomas Reynolds 100%
Jay Rockefeller IV 50%
Mike Rogers 100%
Mike Ross 75%
Steve Rothman 50%
Ken Salazar 50%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top