Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Humane Society Legislative Fund

2007 Positions on Animal Protection

State Office District Name Party Rating
Neil Abercrombie 83%
Gary Ackerman 100%
Daniel Akaka, Sr. 100%
Todd Akin 17%
Rodney Alexander 17%
Wayne Allard 50%
Thomas Allen 83%
Jason Altmire 67%
Rob Andrews 83%
Michael Arcuri 100%
Joe Baca, Sr. 34%
Michele Bachmann 17%
Spencer Bachus 17%
Kay Bailey Hutchison 0%
Brian Baird 67%
J. Gresham Barrett 50%
John Barrow 17%
Roscoe Bartlett 100%
Max Baucus 0%
Evan Bayh 75%
Melissa Bean 67%
Bob Bennett 50%
Shelley Berkley 100%
Howard Berman 100%
Marion Berry 34%
Joe Biden, Jr. 75%
Judy Biggert 100%
Brian Bilbray 50%
Jeff Bingaman 25%
Tim Bishop 100%
John Boehner 0%
Kit Bond 0%
Jo Bonner, Jr. 17%
Mary Bono Mack 100%
Dan Boren 0%
Leonard Boswell 17%
Rick Boucher 83%
Charles Boustany, Jr. 17%
Barbara Boxer 100%
Allen Boyd, Jr. 17%
Nancy Boyda 34%
Bruce Braley 67%
Corrine Brown 67%
Henry Brown, Jr. 50%
Ginny Brown-Waite 17%
Jim Bunning 0%
Dan Burton 67%
Steve Buyer 17%
Robert Byrd 75%
Dave Camp 17%
John Campbell III 100%
Chris Cannon 0%
Eric Cantor 0%
Lois Capps 100%
Dennis Cardoza 0%
Russ Carnahan 67%
Christopher Carney 34%
Mike Castle 100%
Saxby Chambliss 25%
Ben Chandler III 83%
Hillary Clinton 75%
Howard Coble 17%
Thomas Coburn 0%
Norm Coleman 50%
Kent Conrad 25%
Jerry Costello 34%
Larry Craig 0%
Robert Cramer 17%
Ander Crenshaw 67%
Barbara Cubin 34%
Artur Davis 34%
David Davis 0%
Geoff Davis 50%
Lincoln Davis 34%
Thomas Davis III 67%
Bill Delahunt 83%
James DeMint 0%
Lincoln Diaz-Balart 67%
Norm Dicks 100%
John Dingell 17%
Chris Dodd 100%
Elizabeth Dole 75%
Pete Domenici, Jr. 0%
John Doolittle 0%
Byron Dorgan 0%
Thelma Drake 17%
David Dreier 34%
Chet Edwards 34%
Vern Ehlers 67%
Brad Ellsworth 17%
Jo Ann Emerson 17%
Philip English 67%
John Ensign 100%
Bob Etheridge 50%
Terry Everett 50%
Sam Farr 100%
Chaka Fattah, Sr. 83%
Tom Feeney 0%
Russ Feingold 75%
Michael Ferguson 100%
Bob Filner 83%
Randy Forbes 34%
Vito Fossella, Jr. 34%
Barney Frank 83%
Elton Gallegly 100%
Scott Garrett 17%
Jim Gerlach 100%
Gabrielle Giffords 67%
Wayne Gilchrest 67%
Phil Gingrey 17%
Charlie Gonzalez 83%
Virgil Goode, Jr. 34%
Bart Gordon 50%
Judd Gregg 25%
Charles Hagel 25%
John Hall 100%
Ralph Hall 34%
Phil Hare 83%
Tom Harkin 75%
Jane Harman 67%
Doc Hastings 17%
Robert Hayes 17%
Wally Herger, Jr. 17%
Stephanie Herseth Sandlin 50%
Baron Hill 50%
Maurice Hinchey 100%
Rubén Hinojosa, Sr. 17%
David Lee Hobson 34%
Paul Hodes 83%
Pete Hoekstra 17%
Thomas Holden 34%
Rush Holt, Jr. 100%
Mike Honda 83%
Darlene Hooley 83%
Kenny Hulshof 17%
Duncan Hunter 17%
Bob Inglis, Sr. 34%
Daniel Inouye 25%
Steve Israel 100%
Jesse Jackson, Jr. 83%
William Jefferson 50%
Tim Johnson 34%
Timothy Johnson 50%
Steve Kagen 34%
Paul Kanjorski 17%
Richard Keller 50%
Edward Kennedy, Sr. 100%
Patrick Kennedy 100%
John Kerry 100%
Dale Kildee 100%
Carolyn Kilpatrick 67%
Jack Kingston 17%
Mark Kirk 100%
Ron Klein 83%
John Kline 34%
Joseph Knollenberg 17%
Herb Kohl 75%
Dennis Kucinich 100%
John Kuhl, Jr. 34%
Jon Kyl 25%
Ray LaHood 17%
Nicholas Lampson 0%
Mary Landrieu 75%
Tom Latham 17%
Steve LaTourette 83%
Frank Lautenberg 100%
Carl Levin 100%
Jerry Lewis 34%
Ron Lewis 0%
Joe Lieberman 75%
Blanche Lincoln 0%
John Linder 50%
Dick Lugar 50%
Dan Lungren 17%
Connie Mack IV 0%
Tim Mahoney 17%
Don Manzullo 17%
Jim Marshall 17%
Melquiades Martinez 0%
Jim Matheson 17%
Carolyn McCarthy 100%
Thaddeus McCotter 83%
James McCrery III 34%
Jim McDermott 83%
John McHugh 50%
Mike McIntyre 34%
Buck McKeon 34%
Michael McNulty 83%
Kendrick Meek, Sr. 34%
Charlie Melancon, Sr. 34%
John Mica 34%
Mike Michaud 67%
Barbara Mikulski 75%
Candice Miller 17%
Gary Miller 17%
George Miller 100%
Jeff Miller 17%
Brad Miller 100%
Harry Mitchell 100%
Alan Mollohan 50%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top