Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: The Humane Society of the United States

1997 Positions on Animal Protection

State Office District Name Party Rating
Gary Ackerman 100%
Thomas Allen 100%
Rob Andrews 100%
Bill Archer 0%
Richard Armey 0%
Henry Scott Baesler 50%
Richard Hugh Baker 0%
Cass Ballenger 0%
James Barcia 50%
Bob Barr, Jr. 0%
Bill Barrett 0%
Roscoe Bartlett 0%
Charlie Bass 0%
Herbert Bateman 0%
Kenneth Bentsen, Jr. 100%
Douglas Bereuter 0%
Howard Berman 100%
Marion Berry 0%
Brian Bilbray 0%
Michael Bilirakis 50%
Rod Blagojevich 100%
Thomas Bliley, Jr. 0%
Sherwood Boehlert 0%
Henry Bonilla 0%
David Edward Bonior 100%
Robert Borski, Jr. 100%
Leonard Boswell 0%
Rick Boucher 100%
Allen Boyd, Jr. 0%
George Brown, Jr. 50%
Ed Bryant 0%
Jim Bunning 0%
Dan Burton 0%
Steve Buyer 0%
Herbert Callahan 0%
Thomas Campbell 50%
FL Justice of the Supreme Court Charles Canady 0%
Chris Cannon 0%
Julia Carson 100%
Mike Castle 50%
Helen Chenoweth-Hage 0%
Jon Lynn Christensen 0%
William Clay, Sr. 100%
Eva Clayton 100%
Robert Clement 50%
Michael Collins 0%
Larry Combest 0%
Gary Condit 50%
Merrill Cook 50%
John Cooksey 0%
Jerry Costello 50%
Christopher Cox 0%
William Coyne 100%
Robert Cramer 0%
Philip Crane 50%
Barbara Cubin 0%
Randall Cunningham 0%
Patsy Ann Danner 0%
James Davis 0%
Thomas Davis III 50%
Bill Delahunt 50%
Thomas DeLay 0%
Peter Deutsch 100%
Lincoln Diaz-Balart 50%
Jay Dickey 0%
Norm Dicks 50%
Julian Dixon 100%
Calvin Dooley 50%
John Doolittle 0%
David Dreier 0%
Jennifer Dunn 0%
Chet Edwards 0%
Vern Ehlers 0%
Bob Ehrlich, Jr. 0%
Jo Ann Emerson 0%
Philip English 0%
John Ensign 50%
Bob Etheridge 50%
Lane Evans 100%
Terry Everett 0%
Thomas Ewing 0%
Harris Fawell 50%
Victor Fazio 100%
Bob Filner 100%
Mark Foley 0%
Michael Patrick Forbes 50%
Harold Ford, Jr. 100%
Tillie Fowler 0%
Jon David Fox 50%
Barney Frank 100%
Robert Franks 50%
Jonas Frost III 0%
Elizabeth Furse 100%
Elton Gallegly 50%
John Ganske 0%
Sam Gejdenson 100%
George Gekas 0%
Richard Andrew Gephardt 100%
Jim Gibbons 0%
Wayne Gilchrest 0%
Paul Gillmor 0%
Benjamin Gilman 50%
Newt Gingrich 0%
Henry Gonzalez 0%
Virgil Goode, Jr. 0%
William Goodling 50%
Bart Gordon 0%
Porter Goss 0%
James Greenwood 0%
Gilbert Gutknecht 0%
Tony Hall 50%
Lee Hamilton 0%
James Hansen 0%
Jane Harman 100%
J. Dennis Hastert 0%
J.D. Hayworth, Jr. 0%
Joel Hefley 0%
W.G. Hefner 0%
Wally Herger, Jr. 0%
Rick Hill 0%
Van Hilleary 0%
Earl Hilliard, Jr. 50%
Maurice Hinchey 100%
David Lee Hobson 0%
Pete Hoekstra 0%
Thomas Holden 50%
Darlene Hooley 50%
Stephen Horn 50%
John Nathan Hostettler 50%
Amory Houghton, Jr. 50%
Kenny Hulshof 0%
Duncan Hunter 0%
Asa Hutchinson 50%
Henry Hyde 0%
Bob Inglis, Sr. 0%
Ernest Istook, Jr. 0%
Jesse Jackson, Jr. 100%
William Jefferson 50%
William Lewis Jenkins 0%
Christopher John 0%
Jay Johnson 0%
Nancy Johnson 0%
Paul Kanjorski 0%
Sue Kelly 50%
Joseph Kennedy II 100%
Patrick Kennedy 100%
Barbara Bailey Kennelly 100%
Dale Kildee 100%
Carolyn Kilpatrick 100%
Jay Kim 0%
Gerald Kleczka 50%
Ronald Klink 50%
Scott Klug 50%
Joseph Knollenberg 0%
James Kolbe 0%
Dennis Kucinich 100%
John LaFalce 50%
Ray LaHood 0%
Nicholas Lampson 100%
Tom Lantos 100%
Stephen Largent 0%
Steve LaTourette 0%
Rick Lazio 50%
James Leach 50%
Jerry Lewis 0%
Ron Lewis 0%
John Linder 0%
William Lipinski 50%
Robert Livingston 0%
William Luther 100%
James Maloney 100%
Thomas Manton 50%
Don Manzullo 0%
Matthew Martinez 50%
Frank Mascara 50%
Robert Matsui 50%
Karen McCarthy 100%
Bill McCollum 0%
James McCrery III 0%
Joseph McDade 0%
Paul McHale 100%
John McHugh 0%
Scott McInnis 0%
David McIntosh 50%
Cynthia Ann McKinney 100%
Michael McNulty 100%
Martin Meehan 100%
Carrie Meek 100%
Jack Metcalf 50%
Juanita Millender-McDonald 100%
Dan Miller 0%
David Minge 0%
Patsy Takemoto Mink 100%
John Moakley 100%
Alan Mollohan 0%
Constance Morella 50%
Jack Murtha 50%
Sue Myrick 0%
George Nethercutt, Jr. 0%
Mark Neumann 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top