Search Form
Now choose a category »

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: The Humane Society of the United States

2000 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
Michael Bilirakis 63
Jeff Bingaman 40
Rod Blagojevich 100
Sherwood Boehlert 88
Kit Bond 20
Henry Bonilla 13
David Edward Bonior 100
Mary Bono Mack 25
Robert Borski, Jr. 88
Leonard Boswell 25
Rick Boucher 63
Allen Boyd, Jr. 13
John Breaux 20
Ed Bryant 13
Jim Bunning 20
Conrad Burns 20
Dan Burton 13
Steve Buyer 0
Robert Byrd 60
Herbert Callahan 13
Ben Campbell 40
Chris Cannon 0
Julia Carson 100
Mike Castle 63
Eva Clayton 25
Joseph Maxwell Cleland 80
Robert Clement 50
Michael Collins 13
Larry Combest 13
Gary Condit 50
Kent Conrad 40
John Cooksey 13
Jerry Costello 100
Christopher Cox 50
William Coyne 88
Larry Craig 0
Robert Cramer 25
Philip Crane 63
Barbara Cubin 13
Randall Cunningham 13
Thomas Daschle 60
James Davis 50
Thomas Davis III 63
Bill Delahunt 100
Thomas DeLay 13
James DeMint 25
Peter Deutsch 100
Lincoln Diaz-Balart 63
Norm Dicks 75
Julian Dixon 100
Chris Dodd 80
Pete Domenici, Jr. 0
Calvin Dooley 50
John Doolittle 0
Byron Dorgan 60
David Dreier 0
Jennifer Dunn 25
John Edwards 60
Chet Edwards 38
Vern Ehlers 50
Bob Ehrlich, Jr. 25
Jo Ann Emerson 13
Philip English 63
Bob Etheridge 75
Lane Evans 100
Terry Everett 13
Russ Feingold 60
Bob Filner 100
Peter Fitzgerald 80
Ernest Fletcher 38
Mark Foley 25
Harold Ford, Jr. 50
Vito Fossella, Jr. 50
Barney Frank 88
William Frist 40
Jonas Frost III 25
Elton Gallegly 75
John Ganske 13
George Gekas 13
Richard Andrew Gephardt 50
Jim Gibbons 13
Wayne Gilchrest 50
Paul Gillmor 25
Benjamin Gilman 88
Charlie Gonzalez 100
Virgil Goode, Jr. 38
Bart Gordon 38
Porter Goss 38
Daniel Graham 80
William Phillip Gramm 0
Mark Green 88
James Greenwood 88
Judd Gregg 40
Gilbert Gutknecht 13
Tony Hall 88
James Hansen 13
Robert Hayes 13
J.D. Hayworth, Jr. 13
Joel Hefley 50
Jesse Helms 20
Wally Herger, Jr. 13
Baron Hill 50
Van Hilleary 13
Earl Hilliard, Jr. 38
Maurice Hinchey 88
David Lee Hobson 25
Pete Hoekstra 0
Thomas Holden 25
Ernest Hollings 20
Darlene Hooley 63
Stephen Horn 100
John Nathan Hostettler 0
Amory Houghton, Jr. 50
Kenny Hulshof 50
Duncan Hunter 0
Asa Hutchinson 25
Y. Tim Hutchinson 0
Kay Hutchison 0
Henry Hyde 38
Daniel Inouye 60
Ernest Istook, Jr. 13
Jesse Jackson, Jr. 75
William Jefferson 38
James Merrill Jeffords 80
William Lewis Jenkins 0
Christopher John 0
Nancy Johnson 88
Paul Kanjorski 25
Ric Keller N/A
Sue Kelly 88
Edward Kennedy, Sr. 80
Patrick Kennedy 100
Dale Kildee 100
Carolyn Kilpatrick 75
Gerald Kleczka 100
Joseph Knollenberg 13
Herb Kohl 80
James Kolbe 50
Dennis Kucinich 88
Jon Kyl 40
John LaFalce 50
Ray LaHood 38
Nicholas Lampson 63
Tom Lantos 75
Stephen Largent 25
Steve LaTourette 75
James Leach 88
Jerry Lewis 25
Ron Lewis 13
Joe Lieberman 80
Blanche Lincoln 20
John Linder 13
William Lipinski 100
Trent Lott, Sr. 0
Dick Lugar 40
William Luther 88
James Maloney 100
Don Manzullo 0
Frank Mascara 63
Robert Matsui 75
Karen McCarthy 88
James McCrery III 25
John McHugh 13
Scott McInnis 13
Cynthia Ann McKinney 100
Michael McNulty 50
Martin Meehan 100
Carrie Meek 63
Juanita Millender-McDonald 75
Dan Miller 38
Patsy Takemoto Mink 63
John Moakley 88
Alan Mollohan 13
Dennis Moore 63
Constance Morella 88
Frank Murkowski 0
Jack Murtha 13
Sue Myrick 38
George Nethercutt, Jr. 25
Robert William Ney 13
Don Nickles 0
Anne Northup 75
Charles Norwood, Jr. 0
James Nussle 13
Jim Oberstar 50
Dave Obey 63
John Olver 100
Solomon Ortiz, Sr. 13
Doug Ose 38
Major Owens 75
Michael Oxley 25
Ron Paul 50
Donald Payne 88
John Peterson 13
David Phelps 88
Charles Pickering, Jr. 25
Richard Pombo 13
Earl Pomeroy 38
Deborah Pryce 63
Jack Quinn 13

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top