Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: ConservAmerica

2006 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
TX U.S. House 19 Randy Neugebauer Republican 17
CA U.S. House 22 Devin Nunes Republican 17
NM U.S. House 2 Steve Pearce Republican 17
IN Governor Mike Pence Republican 17
PA U.S. House 16 Joe Pitts Republican 25
TX U.S. House 2 Ted Poe Republican 8
GA U.S. House 6 Tom Price Republican 25
WA U.S. House 8 Dave Reichert Republican 75
KS U.S. Senate Sr Pat Roberts Republican 0
KY U.S. House 5 Hal Rogers Republican 25
AL U.S. House 3 Mike Rogers Republican 25
CA U.S. House 48 Dana Rohrabacher Republican 33
FL U.S. House 27 Ileana Ros-Lehtinen Republican 50
CA U.S. House 39 Ed Royce Republican 33
WI U.S. House 1 Paul Ryan Republican 25
WI U.S. House 5 Jim Sensenbrenner, Jr. Republican 33
AL U.S. Senate Jr Jeff Sessions III Republican 0
TX U.S. House 32 Pete Sessions Republican 17
AL U.S. Senate Sr Richard Shelby Republican 0
IL U.S. House 15 John Shimkus Republican 17
PA U.S. House 9 Bill Shuster Republican 17
ID U.S. House 2 Mike Simpson Republican 25
NJ U.S. House 4 Chris Smith Republican 92
TX U.S. House 21 Lamar Smith Republican 25
TX U.S. House 13 Mac Thornberry Republican 17
SD U.S. Senate Sr John Thune Republican 0
OH U.S. House 12 Pat Tiberi Republican 25
OH U.S. House 10 Mike Turner Republican 17
MI U.S. House 6 Fred Upton Republican 50
LA U.S. Senate Sr David Vitter Republican 0
OR U.S. House 2 Greg Walden Republican 25
GA U.S. House 3 Lynn Westmoreland Republican 17
KY U.S. House 1 Ed Whitfield Republican 42
MS U.S. Senate Jr Roger Wicker Republican 17
AK U.S. House At-Large Donald Young Republican 17

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top