Rating Group: Iowa Federation of Labor, AFL-CIO

2001 Positions

Issues: Labor Unions
State Office Name Party Rating
IA U.S. House-4 Steve King R 13%
IA State House-3 Daniel Huseman R 6%
IA State House-4 Dwayne Alons R 6%
IA State House-8 Henry Rayhons R 6%
IA State House-20 Clel Baudler R 6%
IA State House-21 Jack Drake R 6%
IA State House-24 Cecil Dolecheck R 6%
IA State House-70 Todd Taylor D 94%
IA State House-71 Mark Smith D 88%
IA State House-84 David Heaton R 6%
IA State House-85 Vicki Lensing D 94%
IA State House-86 Mary Mascher D 94%
IA State House-87 Dennis Cohoon D 81%
IA State House-90 Cindy Winckler D 94%
IA State House-99 Pat Murphy D 75%
IA State Senate-1 David Johnson R 6%
IA State Senate-8 Michael Gronstal D 87%
IA State Senate-9 Nancy Boettger R 7%
IA State Senate-11 Hubert Houser R 0%
IA State Senate-15 Dennis Black D 79%
IA State Senate-16 Dick Dearden D 93%
IA State Senate-17 Jack Hatch D 94%
IA State Senate-18 Janet Petersen D 69%
IA State Senate-21 Matthew McCoy D 87%
IA State Senate-24 Jerry Behn R 13%
IA State Senate-25 Bill Dix R 6%
IA State Senate-31 Bill Dotzler, Jr. D 94%
IA State Senate-35 Wally Horn D 80%
IA State Senate-37 Robert Dvorsky D 93%
IA State Senate-39 Sandy Greiner R 13%
IA State Senate-43 Joe Bolkcom D 93%
IA State Senate-45 Joe Seng D 88%
IA State Senate-50 Pam Jochum D 88%
IA Director of the Department of Natural Resources Charles Gipp R 6%
Jeff Angelo 7%
Rich Arnold 13%
Andra Atteberry 69%
Donna Hammitt Barry 6%
Merlin Bartz 13%
Paul Bell 75%
Carmine Boal 6%
Daniel Boddicker 13%
Effie Lee Boggess 6%
Clyde Edward Bradley 0%
Barry Brauns 6%
Roger Broers 6%
Robert John Brunkhorst 13%
Polly Bukta 94%
Danny Carroll 6%
Frank Chiodo 69%
Michael Connolly 93%
John Connors 81%
Michael Cormack 44%
Betty De Boef 13%
Patrick Deluhery 93%
Richard Drake 20%
Russell James Eddie 6%
George Eichhorn 19%
Jeffrey Elgin 6%
Steve Falck 94%
Ed Fallon, Jr. 81%
Thomas Fiegen 86%
Barbara Finch 6%
Bill Fink 87%
Thomas Flynn 73%
Romaine Foege 88%
Wayne Ford 94%
Eugene Fraise 87%
Mary Lou Freeman 7%
Marcella Frevert 94%
Teresa Garman 38%
E. Thurman Gaskill 7%
Jane Greimann 88%
Betty Grundberg 6%
Jim Hahn 6%
Johnie Hammond 100%
Brad Hansen 6%
Steven Hansen 80%
Patricia Joan Harper 93%
Clarence Hoffman 6%
Jack Holveck 93%
Lance Horbach 6%
Greg Hoversten 0%
Geri Huser 63%
Stewart Iverson, Jr. 7%
Libby Jacobs 6%
G. Willard Jenkins 13%
John Jensen 7%
JoAnn Mardelle Johnson 13%
Steve Kettering 13%
John Kibbie 80%
Ralph Klemme 6%
Mary Kramer 7%
Keith Kreiman 88%
Mark Kuhn 81%
Jeffrey Lamberti 7%
Rick Larkin 88%
Charles Larson, Jr. 6%
Mary Lundby 33%
O. Gene Maddox 13%
Gene Manternach 6%
Dennis May 75%
Andy McKean 7%
Larry McKibben 13%
Paul McKinley 13%
Derryl McLaren 0%
Dolores Mertz 69%
Janet Metcalf 6%
David Millage 6%
David Miller 7%
Richard Myers 81%
Michael O'Brien 75%
Robert Osterhaus 81%
Brian Quirk 69%
Scott Raecker 6%
Christopher Rants 6%
Donald Redfern 13%
John Redwine 7%
Kitty Rehberg 13%
Leigh Rekow 6%
Rebecca Reynolds 75%
Steven Richardson 88%
Sheldon Rittmer 27%
Rod Roberts 6%
Paul Scherrman 94%
David Floyd Schrader 88%
Neal Schuerer 13%
Mike Sexton 7%
Mark Shearer 73%
Pat Shey 13%
Donald Shoultz 81%
J. Brent Siegrist 6%
Bryan Sievers 6%
Betty Soukup 87%
Greg Stevens 75%
Steven Sukup 6%
Rich Taylor 81%
Russell Teig 6%
Margaret Tinsman 27%
Mark Tremmel 94%
Jodi Tymeson 6%
Phillip Tyrrell 6%
James Van Engelenhoven 6%
James Van Fossen 6%
Kenneth Veenstra 13%
Steven Warnstadt 63%
Richard Weidman 6%
Philip Wise 75%
William Witt 94%
Mark Zieman 13%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.