| State | Office | District | Name | Party | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MI | Lieutenant Governor | Brian Calley | Republican | 64 | |
| MI | State House | 84 | Terry Brown | Democratic | 18 |
| MI | State Senate | 1 | Coleman Young II | Democratic | 9 |
| MI | State Senate | 2 | Bert Johnson | Democratic | 9 |
| MI | State Senate | 5 | Tupac Hunter | Democratic | 18 |
| MI | State Senate | 6 | Glenn Anderson | Democratic | 73 |
| MI | State Senate | 10 | Tory Rocca | Republican | 36 |
| MI | State Senate | 12 | James Marleau | Republican | 91 |
| MI | State Senate | 13 | John Pappageorge | Republican | 64 |
| MI | State Senate | 17 | Randy Richardville | Republican | 64 |
| MI | State Senate | 18 | Rebekah Warren | Democratic | 9 |
| MI | State Senate | 21 | John Proos IV | Republican | 82 |
| MI | State Senate | 23 | Gretchen Whitmer | Democratic | 20 |
| MI | State Senate | 24 | Rick Jones | Republican | 82 |
| MI | State Senate | 25 | Phillip Pavlov | Republican | 100 |
| MI | State Senate | 28 | Mark Jansen | Republican | 73 |
| MI | State Senate | 29 | David Hildenbrand | Republican | 73 |
| MI | State Senate | 30 | Arlan Meekhof | Republican | 100 |
| MI | State Senate | 32 | Roger Kahn | Republican | 73 |
| MI | State Senate | 34 | Goeff Hansen | Republican | 73 |
| MI | State Senate | 35 | Darwin Booher | Republican | 91 |
| MI | Treasurer | Andy Dillon | No Party Affiliation | 9 | |
| Dave Agema | 100 | ||||
| Jason Allen | 73 | ||||
| Kathy Angerer | 9 | ||||
| Richard Ball | 55 | ||||
| James Barcia | 27 | ||||
| Raymond Basham | 18 | ||||
| Joan Bauer | 9 | ||||
| Douglas Bennett | 10 | ||||
| Patricia Birkholz | 73 | ||||
| Michael Bishop | 64 | ||||
| Elizabeth Brater | 36 | ||||
| Cameron Brown | 82 | ||||
| Pamela Byrnes | 9 | ||||
| Barbara Byrum | 18 | ||||
| Nancy Cassis | 82 | ||||
| Bill Caul | 82 | ||||
| Deborah Cherry | 18 | ||||
| Irma Clark-Coleman | 20 | ||||
| Hansen Clarke | 30 | ||||
| Ed Clemente | 9 | ||||
| Bob Constan | 9 | ||||
| Marc Corriveau | 36 | ||||
| Andrew Coulouris | 9 | ||||
| Alan Cropsey | 64 | ||||
| George Cushingberry, Jr. | 9 | ||||
| Robert Dean | 18 | ||||
| Marie Donigan | 9 | ||||
| Kate Ebli | 27 | ||||
| Kevin Elsenheimer | 91 | ||||
| John Espinoza | 10 | ||||
| Valdemar Garcia | 45 | ||||
| Tom George | 82 | ||||
| Judson Gilbert II | 73 | ||||
| John Gleason | 18 | ||||
| Lee Gonzales | 10 | ||||
| Kevin Green | 90 | ||||
| Martin Griffin | 45 | ||||
| Richard Hammel | 9 | ||||
| Bill Hardiman | 73 | ||||
| Kenneth Horn | 82 | ||||
| Shanelle Jackson | 9 | ||||
| Gilda Jacobs | 18 | ||||
| Ron Jelinek | 55 | ||||
| Robert Jones | 9 | ||||
| Martin Knollenberg | 91 | ||||
| Wayne Kuipers | 64 | ||||
| Michael Lahti | 9 | ||||
| Richard LeBlanc | 18 | ||||
| Gabriel Leland | 9 | ||||
| LaMar Lemmons, Jr. | 9 | ||||
| Steven Lindberg | 9 | ||||
| Jeff Mayes | 18 | ||||
| Gary McDowell | 9 | ||||
| Michelle McManus | 73 | ||||
| Mark Meadows | 9 | ||||
| Tim Melton | 9 | ||||
| Kim Meltzer | 80 | ||||
| Fred Miller | 9 | ||||
| Tim Moore | 64 | ||||
| Chuck Moss | 100 | ||||
| Dennis Olshove | 18 | ||||
| Paul Opsommer | 82 | ||||
| Bruce Patterson | 80 | ||||
| Thomas Pearce | 100 | ||||
| Gino Polidori | 9 | ||||
| Michael Prusi | 27 | ||||
| Alan Sanborn | 91 | ||||
| Tonya Schuitmaker | 91 | ||||
| Bettie Scott | 9 | ||||
| Martha Scott | 20 | ||||
| Joel Sheltrown | 18 | ||||
| Mike Simpson | 27 | ||||
| Alma Smith | 9 | ||||
| Dudley Spade | 27 | ||||
| Tony Stamas | 73 | ||||
| Mickey Switalski | 18 | ||||
| Samuel Thomas III | 18 | ||||
| Mary Valentine | 18 | ||||
| Gerald Van Woerkom | 82 |
Special Interest Groups
Rating Group: Michigan National Federation of Independent Business
2007-2008 Positions on Pro-Small Business Policy
Issues:
Business and Consumers
How to Interpret these Evaluations
Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.
Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.
