Rating Group: Consumer Federation of California

2011 Positions

State Office Name Party Rating
CA U.S. House-1 Doug LaMalfa R 10%
CA U.S. House-2 Jared Huffman D 100%
CA U.S. House-8 Paul Cook R 8%
CA U.S. House-11 Mark DeSaulnier D 100%
CA U.S. House-21 David Valadao R 8%
CA U.S. House-25 Steve Knight R 8%
CA U.S. House-26 Julia Brownley D 100%
CA U.S. House-33 Ted Lieu D 89%
CA U.S. House-35 Norma Torres D 85%
CA U.S. House-45 Mimi Walters R 0%
CA U.S. House-47 Alan Lowenthal D 100%
CA U.S. House-51 Juan Vargas D 60%
CA State Assembly-6 Beth Gaines R 25%
CA State Assembly-12 Kristin Olsen R 17%
CA State Assembly-14 Susan Bonilla D 100%
CA State Assembly-24 Richard Gordon D 100%
CA State Assembly-27 Nora Campos D 100%
CA State Assembly-30 Luis Alejo D 100%
CA State Assembly-34 Shannon Grove R 8%
CA State Assembly-35 Katcho Achadjian R 23%
CA State Assembly-37 Das Williams D 100%
CA State Assembly-43 Mike Gatto D 92%
CA State Assembly-48 Roger Hernandez D 92%
CA State Assembly-68 Don Wagner R 14%
CA State Assembly-71 Brian Jones R 8%
CA State Assembly-78 Toni Atkins D 100%
CA State Senate-1 Ted Gaines R 22%
CA State Senate-3 Lois Wolk D 92%
CA State Senate-4 Jim Nielsen R 8%
CA State Senate-5 Cathleen Galgiani D 58%
CA State Senate-6 Richard Pan D 92%
CA State Senate-8 Tom Berryhill R 0%
CA State Senate-9 Loni Hancock D 100%
CA State Senate-10 Bob Wieckowski D 100%
CA State Senate-11 Mark Leno D 100%
CA State Senate-12 Anthony Cannella R 20%
CA State Senate-13 Gerald Hill D 100%
CA State Senate-15 Jim Beall, Jr. D 100%
CA State Senate-16 Jean Fuller R 20%
CA State Senate-17 Bill Monning D 100%
CA State Senate-22 Ed Hernandez D 58%
CA State Senate-23 Mike Morrell R 8%
CA State Senate-24 Kevin de Leon D 90%
CA State Senate-25 Carol Liu D 89%
CA State Senate-27 Fran Pavley D 100%
CA State Senate-29 Robert Huff R 0%
CA State Senate-30 Holly Mitchell D 92%
CA State Senate-32 Tony Mendoza D 100%
CA State Senate-33 Ricardo Lara D 92%
CA State Senate-35 Isadore Hall III D 82%
CA State Senate-38 Joel Anderson R 18%
CA State Senate-39 Martin Block D 100%
CA State Senate-40 Ben Hueso D 100%
CA Secretary of State Alex Padilla D 100%
CA Supervisor-1 Kevin Jeffries 25%
CA Supervisor-4 Curt Hagman 17%
CA Supervisor-5 Joe Simitian N/A 91%
CA Council Member-1 Gilbert Cedillo 100%
CA Council Member-3 Bob Blumenfield 100%
CA Council Member-7 Felipe Fuentes 92%
CA Council Member-9 Curren Price, Jr. 80%
Michael Allen 100%
Elaine Alquist 100%
Tom Ammiano 100%
Bill Berryhill 17%
Sam Blakeslee 31%
Steven Bradford 100%
Joan Buchanan 75%
Betsy Butler 100%
Charles Calderon 77%
Ron Calderon 33%
Amina Carter 100%
Wesley Chesbro 83%
Connie Conway 8%
Ellen Corbett 100%
Lou Correa 50%
Mike Davis 82%
Roger Dickinson 100%
Tim Donnelly 8%
Robert Dutton 22%
Bill Emmerson 30%
Mike Eng 100%
Noreen Evans 100%
Mike Feuer 100%
Nathan Fletcher 31%
Paul Fong 100%
Warren Furutani 92%
Martin Garrick 8%
Jeff Gorell 0%
Linda Halderman 8%
Diane Harkey 8%
Tom Harman 22%
Mary Hayashi 100%
Alyson Huber 64%
Christine Kehoe 100%
Dan Logue 8%
Bonnie Lowenthal 100%
Fiona Ma 100%
Allan Mansoor 8%
Jeff Miller 25%
Gloria Negrete McLeod 33%
Brian Nestande 25%
Chris Norby 8%
Henry Perea 62%
John Pérez 100%
Manuel Pérez 83%
Anthony Portantino, Jr. 100%
Michael Rubio 64%
George Runner, Jr. 25%
Jim Silva 8%
Nancy Skinner 100%
Cameron Smyth 17%
Jose Solorio 67%
Darrell Steinberg 100%
Tony Strickland 25%
Sandré Swanson 100%
Roderick Wright 67%
Mark Wyland 20%
Mariko Yamada 100%
Leland Yee 89%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.