Rating Group: Consumer Federation of California

2009 Positions

State Office Name Party Rating
CA U.S. House-2 Jared Huffman D 100%
CA U.S. House-8 Paul Cook R 20%
CA U.S. House-10 Jeff Denham R 20%
CA U.S. House-11 Mark DeSaulnier D 91%
CA U.S. House-25 Steve Knight R 19%
CA U.S. House-26 Julia Brownley D 100%
CA U.S. House-33 Ted Lieu D 88%
CA U.S. House-35 Norma Torres D 87%
CA U.S. House-37 Karen Bass D 87%
CA U.S. House-45 Mimi Walters R 6%
CA U.S. House-47 Alan Lowenthal D 93%
CA State Senate-1 Ted Gaines R 13%
CA State Senate-3 Lois Wolk D 87%
CA State Senate-4 Jim Nielsen R 31%
CA State Senate-5 Cathleen Galgiani D 60%
CA State Senate-8 Tom Berryhill R 20%
CA State Senate-9 Loni Hancock D 100%
CA State Senate-11 Mark Leno D 100%
CA State Senate-13 Gerald Hill D 88%
CA State Senate-15 James Beall, Jr. D 87%
CA State Senate-16 Jean Fuller R 20%
CA State Senate-17 Bill Monning D 100%
CA State Senate-22 Edward Hernandez D 71%
CA State Senate-24 Kevin de Leon D 88%
CA State Senate-25 Carol Liu D 100%
CA State Senate-27 Fran Pavley D 93%
CA State Senate-29 Robert Huff R 14%
CA State Senate-32 Tony Mendoza D 80%
CA State Senate-35 Isadore Hall III D 63%
CA State Senate-38 Joel Anderson R 20%
CA State Senate-39 Martin Block D 80%
CA Secretary of State Alex Padilla D 100%
CA Insurance Commissioner Dave Jones D 100%
CA Mayor-At-Large Mary Salas 94%
CA Supervisor-1 Kevin Jeffries 20%
CA Supervisor-4 John Benoit 13%
CA Supervisor-4 Curt Hagman 13%
CA Supervisor-5 Joe Simitian D 100%
CA Council Member-1 Gilbert Cedillo 79%
CA Council Member-2 Paul Krekorian 100%
CA Council Member-3 Bob Blumenfield 93%
CA Council Member-6 David Cogdill 14%
CA Council Member-7 Felipe Fuentes 75%
CA Council Member-9 Curren Price, Jr. 93%
CA State Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Torlakson Other 94%
CA State Board of Equalization Diane Harkey R 13%
CA State Board of Equalization Fiona Ma D 87%
CA State Board of Equalization George Runner, Jr. R 13%
Samuel Aanestad 47%
Anthony Adams 13%
Elaine Alquist 93%
Tom Ammiano 100%
Juan Arambula 80%
Roy Ashburn 17%
Bill Berryhill 20%
Sam Blakeslee 13%
Joan Buchanan 83%
Anna Caballero 73%
Charles Calderon 63%
Ron Calderon 53%
Amina Carter 75%
Wesley Chesbro 100%
Connie Conway 11%
Ellen Corbett 100%
Lou Correa 67%
Joe Coto 88%
Dave Cox 20%
Mike Davis 75%
Hector De La Torre 94%
Charles DeVore 13%
Denise Ducheny 71%
Robert Dutton 14%
Michael Duvall 17%
Bill Emmerson 18%
Mike Eng 100%
Noreen Evans 100%
Mike Feuer 100%
Nathan Fletcher 19%
Dean Florez 81%
Paul Fong 93%
Warren Furutani 80%
Martin Garrick 20%
Danny Gilmore 20%
Tom Harman 15%
Mary Hayashi 82%
Dennis Hollingsworth 7%
Alyson Huber 53%
Christine Kehoe 87%
Dan Logue 27%
Bonnie Lowenthal 100%
Abel Maldonado 64%
Jeff Miller 18%
Pedro Nava 100%
Gloria Negrete McLeod 75%
Brian Nestande 13%
Roger Niello 25%
Jenny Oropeza 87%
John Pérez 94%
Manuel Pérez 75%
Anthony Portantino, Jr. 87%
Gloria Romero 93%
Ira Ruskin 100%
Lori Saldaña 100%
Jim Silva 13%
Nancy Skinner 88%
Cameron Smyth 12%
Jose Solorio 69%
Darrell Steinberg 93%
Tony Strickland 29%
Audra Strickland 18%
Sandré Swanson 100%
Alberto Torrico 93%
Van Tran 25%
Mike Villines 27%
Patricia Wiggins 93%
Roderick Wright 73%
Mark Wyland 18%
Mariko Yamada 93%
Leland Yee 82%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.