| State | Office | District | Name | Party | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Samuel Aanestad | 36% | ||||
| Anthony Adams | 60% | ||||
| Elaine Alquist | 96% | ||||
| Juan Arambula | 96% | ||||
| Roy Ashburn | 48% | ||||
| CA | Supervisor | 4 | John Benoit | 52% | |
| Sam Blakeslee | 68% | ||||
| Anna Caballero | 92% | ||||
| Charles Calderon | 84% | ||||
| Amina Carter | 96% | ||||
| Gilbert Cedillo | 92% | ||||
| Joe Coto | 96% | ||||
| Dave Cox | 52% | ||||
| Mike Davis | 88% | ||||
| Hector De La Torre | 92% | ||||
| Charles DeVore | 52% | ||||
| Denise Ducheny | 96% | ||||
| Robert Dutton | 56% | ||||
| Michael Duvall | 52% | ||||
| Mike Eng | 96% | ||||
| Mike Feuer | 88% | ||||
| Dean Florez | 84% | ||||
| Warren Furutani | 92% | ||||
| Martin Garrick | 56% | ||||
| Tom Harman | 56% | ||||
| Mary Hayashi | 96% | ||||
| Dennis Hollingsworth | 36% | ||||
| Kevin Jeffries | 64% | ||||
| Christine Kehoe | 96% | ||||
| Fiona Ma | 96% | ||||
| Abel Maldonado | 76% | ||||
| Tony Mendoza | 96% | ||||
| Pedro Nava | 96% | ||||
| Roger Niello | 56% | ||||
| Jenny Oropeza | 88% | ||||
| Anthony Portantino, Jr. | 96% | ||||
| Gloria Romero | 96% | ||||
| George Runner, Jr. | 44% | ||||
| Ira Ruskin | 96% | ||||
| Mary Salas | 96% | ||||
| Lori Saldaña | 88% | ||||
| Jim Silva | 60% | ||||
| Saren Simitian | 96% | ||||
| Cameron Smyth | 68% | ||||
| Jose Solorio | 96% | ||||
| Audra Strickland | 68% | ||||
| Sandré Swanson | 96% | ||||
| Alberto Torrico | 96% | ||||
| Van Tran | 60% | ||||
| Mike Villines | 44% | ||||
| Patricia Wiggins | 96% | ||||
| CA | U.S. House | 37 | Karen Bass | Democratic | 96% |
| CA | State Senate | 15 | James Beall, Jr. | Democratic | 96% |
| CA | U.S. House | 26 | Julia Brownley | Democratic | 96% |
| CA | State Senate | 30 | Ron Calderon | Democratic | 96% |
| CA | State Senate | 10 | Ellen Corbett | Democratic | 96% |
| CA | State Senate | 34 | Lou Correa | Democratic | 84% |
| CA | State Senate | 22 | Kevin de Leon | Democratic | 96% |
| CA | State Senate | 7 | Mark DeSaulnier | Democratic | 96% |
| CA | State Senate | 2 | Noreen Evans | Democratic | 96% |
| CA | Council Member | 7 | Felipe Fuentes | Democratic | 96% |
| CA | State Senate | 5 | Cathleen Galgiani | Democratic | 92% |
| CA | State Senate | 9 | Loni Hancock | Democratic | 96% |
| CA | State Senate | 24 | Edward Hernandez | Democratic | 96% |
| CA | U.S. House | 2 | Jared Huffman | Democratic | 92% |
| CA | Insurance Commissioner | Dave Jones | Democratic | 96% | |
| CA | Council Member | 2 | Paul Krekorian | Democratic | 92% |
| CA | State Senate | 11 | Mark Leno | Democratic | 88% |
| CA | State Senate | 28 | Ted Lieu | Democratic | 96% |
| CA | State Assembly | 70 | Bonnie Lowenthal | Democratic | 92% |
| CA | U.S. House | 35 | Gloria Negrete McLeod | Democratic | 96% |
| CA | State Senate | 20 | Alex Padilla | Democratic | 96% |
| CA | State Senate | 26 | Curren Price, Jr. | Democratic | 96% |
| CA | State Senate | 6 | Darrell Steinberg | Democratic | 92% |
| CA | State Senate | 3 | Lois Wolk | Democratic | 96% |
| CA | State Senate | 8 | Leland Yee | Democratic | 88% |
| CA | Superintendent of Public Instruction | Tom Torlakson | Non-partisan | 96% | |
| CA | State Senate | 36 | Joel Anderson | Republican | 40% |
| CA | State Senate | 14 | Thomas Berryhill | Republican | 60% |
| CA | Councilmember | At-Large | David Cogdill | Republican | 44% |
| CA | U.S. House | 8 | Paul Cook | Republican | 68% |
| CA | U.S. House | 10 | Jeff Denham | Republican | 64% |
| CA | State Senate | 23 | Bill Emmerson | Republican | 64% |
| CA | State Senate | 18 | Jean Fuller | Republican | 60% |
| CA | State Senate | 1 | Ted Gaines | Republican | 48% |
| CA | State Senate | 29 | Robert Huff | Republican | 52% |
| CA | State Senate | 37 | Mimi Walters | Republican | 40% |
| CA | State Senate | 38 | Mark Wyland | Republican | 60% |
Issues:
Marriage, Family, and Children
How to Interpret these Evaluations
Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.
Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.
