or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Children's Advocacy Institute

2004 Positions on Child and Youth Issues

State Office District Name Party Rating
CA U.S. House 1 Doug LaMalfa Republican 29
CA U.S. House 4 Tom McClintock Republican 38
CA U.S. House 10 Jeff Denham Republican 38
CA U.S. House 14 Jackie Speier Democratic 76
CA U.S. House 23 Kevin McCarthy Republican 29
CA U.S. House 27 Judy Chu Democratic 90
CA U.S. House 35 Gloria Negrete McLeod Democratic 86
CA U.S. House 45 John Campbell III Republican 29
CA U.S. House 47 Alan Lowenthal Democratic 90
CA U.S. House 51 Juan Vargas Democratic 90
CA State Assembly 2 Wesley Chesbro Democratic 90
CA State Senate 3 Lois Wolk Democratic 90
CA State Senate 6 Darrell Steinberg Democratic 86
CA State Senate 8 Leland Yee Democratic 90
CA State Senate 9 Loni Hancock Democratic 86
CA State Senate 10 Ellen Corbett Democratic 86
CA State Senate 11 Mark Leno Democratic 86
CA State Senate 19 Hannah-Beth Jackson Democratic 90
CA State Senate 25 Carol Liu Democratic 86
CA State Senate 27 Fran Pavley Democratic 76
CA State Senate 34 Lou Correa Democratic 81
CA State Senate 38 Mark Wyland Republican 38
CA Secretary of State Debra Bowen Democratic 67
CA Supervisor 2 Mark Ridley-Thomas Democratic 90
CA Supervisor 3 Wilma Chan Democratic 86
CA Supervisor 3 Todd Spitzer Republican 43
CA Supervisor 4 John Benoit 33
CA Supervisor 5 Bruce McPherson 48
CA Supervisor 5 Saren Simitian Democratic 81
CA Council Member 1 Gilbert Cedillo Democratic 90
CA Council Member 5 Paul Koretz Democratic 48
CA Council Member 6 David Cogdill Republican 33
CA Council Member At-Large Alan Nakanishi 43
CA Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Torlakson Non-partisan 90
Samuel Aanestad 33
Richard Ackerman 29
Gregory Aghazarian 33
Richard Alarcón 90
Deirdre Alpert 86
Roy Ashburn 33
Patricia Bates 38
James Battin 29
Patty Berg 90
Rudy Bermúdez 90
Russell Bogh 33
James Brulte 29
John Burton 86
Charles Calderon 67
Joseph Canciamilla 71
Edward Chavez 90
Rebecca Cohn 86
Dave Cox 33
Lynn Daucher 52
Manny Diaz 86
Denise Ducheny 81
Joseph Dunn 67
John Anthony Dutra 90
Robert Dutton 29
Mervyn Dymally 86
Martha Escutia 90
Liz Figueroa 90
Marco Antonio Firebaugh 90
Dean Florez 81
Dario Frommer 86
Bonnie Garcia 48
Jackie Goldberg 81
Tom Harman 38
Raymond Haynes, Jr. 24
Dennis Hollingsworth 29
Jerome Horton 86
Shirley Horton 57
Guy Houston 38
Ross Johnson 29
Betty Karnette 90
Richard Keene 29
Christine Kehoe 90
Sheila Kuehl 86
John Laird 90
Jay La Suer 29
Robert Leslie 33
Lloyd Levine 90
Sally Lieber 90
John Longville 86
Michael Machado 81
Ken Maddox 38
Abel Maldonado 67
Bob Margett 29
Barbara Matthews 76
Bill Maze 33
Cindy Montañez 90
William Phillip Morrow 29
Dennis Lee Mountjoy 33
Eugene Mullin 90
Kevin Murray 71
George Nakano 86
Joseph Nation 86
Fabian Núñez 90
Thomas Oller 29
Jenny Oropeza 81
Deborah Ortiz 86
Robert Pacheco 33
Nicole Parra 76
Don Perata 86
George Plescia 33
Charles Poochigian 29
Sarah Reyes 90
Keith Stuart Richman 48
Gloria Romero 81
George Runner, Jr. 29
Simón Salinas 90
Steve Samuelian 38
Jack Scott 86
Byron Sher 81
Nell Soto 90
Audra Strickland 33
John Vasconcellos 76
Edward Vincent 24
Herb Wesson, Jr. 90
Patricia Wiggins 90

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top