Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: American Association of University Women of California

2000 Positions

Issues: Education , Women
State Office District Name Party Rating
CA U.S. House 14 Jackie Speier Democratic 100%
CA U.S. House 16 Jim Costa Democratic 88%
CA U.S. House 29 Tony Cárdenas Democratic 94%
CA U.S. House 47 Alan Lowenthal Democratic 100%
CA State Senate 18 Robert Hertzberg Democratic 100%
CA State Senate 19 Hannah-Beth Jackson Democratic 100%
CA State Senate 36 Pat Bates Republican 38%
CA Supervisor 4 Dick Monteith 13%
CA Supervisor 5 Bruce McPherson 81%
CA Council Member 1 Gilbert Cedillo 94%
Samuel Aanestad 6%
Richard Alarcón 100%
Deirdre Alpert 88%
Elaine Alquist 100%
Dion Aroner 100%
Roy Ashburn 13%
Debra Bowen 94%
Mike Briggs 6%
James Brulte 25%
John Burton 100%
Thomas Calderon 100%
Bill Campbell 31%
Dennis Cardoza 88%
Wesley Chesbro 88%
Ellen Corbett 100%
Lou Correa 94%
Dave Cox 19%
Richard Dickerson 38%
Joe Dunn 100%
John Anthony Dutra 94%
Martha Escutia 94%
Liz Figueroa 94%
Marco Antonio Firebaugh 94%
Dean Florez 81%
Sally Havice 75%
Ray Haynes, Jr. 6%
K. Maurice Johannessen 19%
Ross Johnson 19%
Betty Karnette 100%
Fred Keeley 94%
William Knight 13%
Lynne Leach 44%
Bill Leonard 13%
John Longville 100%
Ken Maddox 19%
Abel Maldonado 81%
Carole Migden 100%
William Phillip Morrow 6%
Kevin Murray 81%
George Nakano 81%
Jack O'Connell 100%
Deborah Ortiz 88%
Robert Pacheco 44%
Rod Pacheco 38%
Louis Papan 88%
Steve Peace 69%
Don Perata 94%
Anthony Pescetti 56%
Richard Polanco 75%
Charles Poochigian 13%
Sarah Reyes 88%
George Runner, Jr. 38%
Kevin Shelley 100%
Byron Sher 88%
Nell Soto 94%
Darrell Steinberg 100%
Tony Strickland 31%
Virginia Strom-Martin 100%
Helen Thomson 100%
John Vasconcellos 75%
Carl Washington 81%
Howard Wayne 88%
Herb Wesson, Jr. 94%
Patricia Wiggins 100%
Roderick Wright 94%
Charlene Zettel 50%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top