Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: American Association of University Women of California

2000 Positions

Issues: Education , Women
State Office District Name Party Rating
Richard Alarcón 100%
Elaine Alquist 100%
Dion Aroner 100%
John Burton 100%
Thomas Calderon 100%
Ellen Corbett 100%
Joe Dunn 100%
CA State Senate 18 Robert Hertzberg Democratic 100%
CA State Senate 19 Hannah-Beth Jackson Democratic 100%
Betty Karnette 100%
John Longville 100%
CA U.S. House 47 Alan Lowenthal Democratic 100%
Carole Migden 100%
Jack O'Connell 100%
Kevin Shelley 100%
CA U.S. House 14 Jackie Speier Democratic 100%
Darrell Steinberg 100%
Virginia Strom-Martin 100%
Helen Thomson 100%
Patricia Wiggins 100%
Debra Bowen 94%
CA U.S. House 29 Tony Cárdenas Democratic 94%
CA Council Member 1 Gilbert Cedillo 94%
Lou Correa 94%
John Anthony Dutra 94%
Martha Escutia 94%
Liz Figueroa 94%
Marco Antonio Firebaugh 94%
Fred Keeley 94%
Don Perata 94%
Nell Soto 94%
Herb Wesson, Jr. 94%
Roderick Wright 94%
Deirdre Alpert 88%
Dennis Cardoza 88%
Wesley Chesbro 88%
CA U.S. House 16 Jim Costa Democratic 88%
Deborah Ortiz 88%
Louis Papan 88%
Sarah Reyes 88%
Byron Sher 88%
Howard Wayne 88%
Dean Florez 81%
Abel Maldonado 81%
CA Supervisor 5 Bruce McPherson 81%
Kevin Murray 81%
George Nakano 81%
Carl Washington 81%
Sally Havice 75%
Richard Polanco 75%
John Vasconcellos 75%
Steve Peace 69%
Anthony Pescetti 56%
Charlene Zettel 50%
Lynne Leach 44%
Robert Pacheco 44%
CA State Senate 36 Pat Bates Republican 38%
Richard Dickerson 38%
Rod Pacheco 38%
George Runner, Jr. 38%
Bill Campbell 31%
Tony Strickland 31%
James Brulte 25%
Dave Cox 19%
K. Maurice Johannessen 19%
Ross Johnson 19%
Ken Maddox 19%
Roy Ashburn 13%
William Knight 13%
Bill Leonard 13%
CA Supervisor 4 Dick Monteith 13%
Charles Poochigian 13%
Samuel Aanestad 6%
Mike Briggs 6%
Ray Haynes, Jr. 6%
William Phillip Morrow 6%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top