Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Florida Chamber of Commerce

2003 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
FL U.S. Senate Jr Marco Rubio Republican 97%
FL U.S. House 8 Bill Posey Republican 88%
FL U.S. House 10 Daniel Webster Republican 87%
FL U.S. House 12 Gus Bilirakis Republican 96%
FL U.S. House 15 Dennis Ross Republican 110%
FL U.S. House 24 Frederica Wilson Democratic 67%
FL State House 23 Dennis Baxley Republican 100%
FL State House 46 Bruce Antone Democratic 53%
FL State House 83 Gayle Harrell Republican 94%
FL State House 91 Irving Slosberg Democratic 52%
FL State Senate 2 Greg Evers Republican 100%
FL State Senate 4 Aaron Bean Republican 100%
FL State Senate 5 Charles Dean, Sr. Republican 98%
FL State Senate 9 Audrey Gibson Democratic 51%
FL State Senate 10 David Simmons Republican 100%
FL State Senate 13 Andy Gardiner Republican 108%
FL State Senate 16 Thad Altman Republican 100%
FL State Senate 19 Arthenia Joyner Democratic 42%
FL State Senate 24 Tom Lee Republican 85%
FL State Senate 26 Bill Galvano Republican 80%
FL State Senate 28 Nancy Detert Republican 92%
FL State Senate 31 Christopher Smith Democratic 41%
FL State Senate 32 Joe Negron Republican 105%
FL State Senate 33 Eleanor Sobel Democratic 51%
FL State Senate 35 Gwen Margolis Democratic 60%
FL State Senate 38 Rene Garcia Republican 90%
FL Chief Financial Officer Jeffrey Atwater Republican 91%
FL Mayor At-Large John Seiler Democratic 52%
FL Council Member At-Large Joyce Cusack Democratic 42%
FL Commissioner 2 Victor Crist Republican 83%
FL Commissioner 2 John Quiñones 86%
FL Commissioner 3 Charlie Justice Democratic 40%
Sandy Adams 97%
J.D. Alexander 98%
Bob Allen 100%
Kevin Ambler 81%
Tom Anderson 92%
Nancy Argenziano 82%
Dave Aronberg 67%
Ralph Arza 105%
Frank Attkisson 100%
Loranne Ausley 52%
Carey Baker 100%
Gustavo Barreiro 88%
Dorothy Bendross-Mindingall 46%
Michael Bennett 78%
Allan George Bense 115%
Holly Benson 97%
Kim Berfield 99%
Marsha Bowen 100%
Mary Brandenburg 64%
Donald Brown 115%
Fredrick Brummer 103%
Phillip Brutus 54%
Susan Bucher 34%
Edward Bullard 61%
Larcenia Bullard 69%
Walter Campbell, Jr. 62%
Lisa Carlton 79%
Donna Clarke 108%
Charles Clary 89%
Lee Constantine 95%
Larry Cretul 95%
Faye Culp 100%
Don Davis 95%
Mike Davis 95%
Mandy Dawson 66%
Alex Diaz de la Portilla 68%
Paula Dockery 79%
Carl Domino 94%
Frank Farkas 99%
Mike Fasano 77%
Terry Fields 50%
Anne Gannon 43%
Rodolfo Garcia, Jr. 79%
Dan Gelber 38%
Steven Geller 58%
Hugh Gibson III 94%
J. Dudley Goodlette 106%
Kenneth Allan Gottlieb 36%
Ronald Greenstein 63%
Mike Haridopolos 91%
Adam Hasner 104%
Bob Henriquez 55%
Anthony Hill, Sr. 49%
Wilbert Theodore Holloway 61%
Edward Homan, Jr. 85%
Edward Jennings, Jr. 45%
Randy Johnson 112%
Dennis Jones 74%
Stan Jordan 95%
Will Kendrick 79%
James King, Jr. 88%
Ron Klein 63%
Jeff Kottkamp 104%
Dick Kravitz 88%
Bruce Kyle 95%
Al Lawson, Jr. 70%
Ken Littlefield 98%
Marcelo Llorente 90%
Evelyn Lynn 82%
Richard Machek 61%
Mark Mahon 100%
Stan Mayfield 102%
Sheri McInvale 69%
Matthew Meadows 47%
David Mealor 100%
Lesley Miller, Jr. 69%
Dave Murzin 98%
Mitch Needelman 95%
Pat Patterson 100%
Durell Peaden, Jr. 72%
Frank Peterman, Jr. 53%
Joe Pickens 115%
Juan-Carlos Planas 88%
Ralph Poppell 100%
Ken Pruitt 94%
Ron Reagan 95%
Nan Rich 44%
Curtis Richardson 54%
David Rivera 93%
Julio Robaina 78%
Yolly Roberson 47%
David Russell, Jr. 98%
Timothy Ryan 49%
Ray Sansom 96%
Burt Saunders 88%
Jim Sebesta 82%
Gary Siplin 69%
Rod Smith 80%
Ken Sorensen 80%
Dwight Stansel 70%
John Stargel 100%
Baxter Troutman 96%
Rochelle Vana 40%
J. Alex Villalobos 76%
Leslie Waters 97%
Stephen Wise 102%
Juan Zapata 91%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top