Rating Group: Florida Chamber of Commerce

2005 Positions

State Office Name Party Rating
FL U.S. Senate-Jr Marco Rubio R 100%
FL U.S. House-8 Bill Posey R 88%
FL U.S. House-10 Daniel Webster R 94%
FL U.S. House-12 Gus Bilirakis R 86%
FL U.S. House-15 Dennis Ross R 91%
FL U.S. House-24 Frederica Wilson D 64%
FL Lieutenant Governor Carlos Lopez-Cantera R 100%
FL State House-23 Dennis Baxley R 100%
FL State House-46 Bruce Antone D 65%
FL State House-83 Gayle Harrell R 94%
FL State House-91 Irving Slosberg D 56%
FL State Senate-2 Greg Evers R 84%
FL State Senate-4 Aaron Bean R 89%
FL State Senate-5 Charles Dean, Sr. R 100%
FL State Senate-8 Dorothy Hukill R 94%
FL State Senate-9 Audrey Gibson D 53%
FL State Senate-10 David Simmons R 100%
FL State Senate-11 Alan Hays R 100%
FL State Senate-13 Andy Gardiner R 93%
FL State Senate-16 Thad Altman R 100%
FL State Senate-17 John Legg R 82%
FL State Senate-19 Arthenia Joyner D 48%
FL State Senate-21 Denise Grimsley R 100%
FL State Senate-24 Tom Lee R 100%
FL State Senate-26 Bill Galvano R 85%
FL State Senate-28 Nancy Detert R 94%
FL State Senate-31 Christopher Smith D 47%
FL State Senate-32 Joe Negron R 100%
FL State Senate-33 Eleanor Sobel D 44%
FL State Senate-35 Gwen Margolis D 82%
FL State Senate-37 Anitere Flores R 100%
FL State Senate-38 Rene Garcia R 89%
FL Chief Financial Officer Jeffrey Atwater R 73%
FL Mayor-At-Large John Seiler D 58%
FL Council Member-At-Large Joyce Cusack D 56%
FL Commissioner-2 Victor Crist R 89%
FL Commissioner-2 John Quiñones 100%
FL Commissioner-3 Charlie Justice D 47%
FL Commissioner-7 Priscilla Ann Taylor D 63%
Sandy Adams 100%
J.D. Alexander 94%
Bob Allen 100%
Kevin Ambler 95%
Tom Anderson 85%
Nancy Argenziano 82%
Dave Aronberg 70%
Ralph Arza 89%
Frank Attkisson 100%
Loranne Ausley 50%
Carey Baker 91%
Gustavo Barreiro 100%
Dorothy Bendross-Mindingall 47%
Michael Bennett 92%
Allan George Bense 100%
Holly Benson 100%
Kim Berfield 94%
Ellyn Bogdanoff 100%
Marsha Bowen 96%
Mary Brandenburg 62%
Donald Brown 100%
Fredrick Brummer 100%
Phillip Brutus 75%
Susan Bucher 38%
Edward Bullard 72%
Larcenia Bullard 77%
Walter Campbell, Jr. 73%
Dean Cannon, Jr. 90%
Lisa Carlton 92%
Jennifer Carroll 100%
Donna Clarke 95%
Charles Clary 100%
Marti Coley 100%
Lee Constantine 94%
Larry Cretul 89%
Faye Culp 100%
Don Davis 95%
Mike Davis 94%
Mandy Dawson 47%
Alex Diaz de la Portilla 78%
Paula Dockery 100%
Carl Domino 92%
Frank Farkas 89%
Mike Fasano 71%
Terry Fields 65%
Anne Gannon 55%
Rodolfo Garcia, Jr. 82%
Dan Gelber 46%
Steven Geller 59%
Hugh Gibson III 94%
Richard Glorioso 100%
Susan Goldstein 100%
J. Dudley Goodlette 94%
Kenneth Allan Gottlieb 65%
Michael Grant 100%
Ronald Greenstein 58%
Mike Haridopolos 93%
Adam Hasner 100%
Bob Henriquez 65%
Anthony Hill, Sr. 58%
Wilbert Theodore Holloway 70%
Edward Homan, Jr. 77%
Edward Jennings, Jr. 63%
Randy Johnson 94%
Dennis Jones 71%
Stan Jordan 100%
Will Kendrick 71%
James King, Jr. 90%
Ron Klein 71%
Jeff Kottkamp 100%
Dick Kravitz 87%
Paige Kreegel 100%
Bruce Kyle 100%
Al Lawson, Jr. 71%
Ken Littlefield 100%
Marcelo Llorente 100%
Evelyn Lynn 100%
Richard Machek 75%
Mark Mahon 100%
Stan Mayfield 100%
Sheri McInvale 96%
Matthew Meadows 54%
David Mealor 100%
Lesley Miller, Jr. 48%
Dave Murzin 100%
Mitch Needelman 100%
Pat Patterson 100%
Durell Peaden, Jr. 71%
Frank Peterman, Jr. 65%
Joe Pickens 100%
Juan-Carlos Planas 93%
Ralph Poppell 95%
Ari Abraham Porth 65%
Bill Proctor 94%
Ken Pruitt 90%
Ron Reagan 100%
Everett Rice 100%
Nan Rich 63%
Curtis Richardson 58%
David Rivera 89%
Julio Robaina 94%
Yolly Roberson 61%
David Russell, Jr. 88%
Timothy Ryan 52%
Franklin Sands 83%
Ray Sansom 100%
Burt Saunders 75%
Jim Sebesta 100%
Gary Siplin 63%
Rod Smith 75%
Ken Sorensen 100%
Dwight Stansel 100%
John Stargel 100%
Anthony Trey Traviesa 89%
Baxter Troutman 94%
Rochelle Vana 59%
J. Alex Villalobos 100%
Leslie Waters 95%
Trudi Williams 100%
Stephen Wise 100%
Juan Zapata 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.