Rating Group: Mississippi Association of Educators

1997 Positions

Issues: Education
State Office Name Party Rating
MS U.S. House-1 Alan Nunnelee R 89%
MS State House-10 H. Nolan Mettetal R 95%
MS State House-16 Steve Holland D 83%
MS State House-27 Ferr Smith D 92%
MS State House-29 Linda Coleman D 92%
MS State House-30 Robert Huddleston D 92%
MS State House-32 Willie Perkins, Sr. D 95%
MS State House-33 Thomas Reynolds II D 83%
MS State House-38 Tyrone Ellis D 92%
MS State House-39 Jeffrey Smith R 69%
MS State House-42 Reecy Dickson D 91%
MS State House-45 Bennett Malone D 92%
MS State House-46 Bobby Howell R 78%
MS State House-49 Willie Bailey D 90%
MS State House-51 Rufus Straughter D 92%
MS State House-53 Robert Moak D 83%
MS State House-57 Edward Blackmon, Jr. D 92%
MS State House-58 Rita Martinson R 78%
MS State House-60 John Moore R 51%
MS State House-61 Ray Rogers R 91%
MS State House-62 Thomas Weathersby, Sr. R 92%
MS State House-64 William Denny, Jr. R 66%
MS State House-65 Mary Coleman D 92%
MS State House-67 Earle Banks D 92%
MS State House-69 Alyce Clarke D 92%
MS State House-70 James Evans D 83%
MS State House-79 Blaine Eaton II D 91%
MS State House-80 Omeria Scott D 92%
MS State House-85 America Middleton D 92%
MS State House-87 Johnny Stringer D 83%
MS State House-89 C. Shows R 91%
MS State House-90 Joseph Warren D 74%
MS State House-94 Robert Johnson III D 91%
MS State House-98 David Myers D 91%
MS State House-103 Percy Watson D 87%
MS State House-106 Herbert Frierson R 92%
MS State House-108 Mark Formby R 69%
MS State House-112 John Read R 79%
MS State Senate-3 Nickey Browning R 89%
MS State Senate-7 Hob Bryan D 93%
MS State Senate-9 Gray Tollison R 90%
MS State Senate-13 Willie Simmons D 83%
MS State Senate-14 Lydia Chassaniol R 77%
MS State Senate-24 David Jordan D 89%
MS State Senate-26 John Horhn D 89%
MS State Senate-27 Hillman Frazier D 89%
MS State Senate-30 Dean Kirby R 66%
MS State Senate-31 Terry Burton R 95%
MS State Senate-32 Sampson Jackson II D 89%
MS State Senate-50 Tommy Gollott R 89%
MS Supervisor-3 Dirk Dedeaux D 92%
MS Public Service Commissioner Lynn Posey R 89%
Jim Crawley Barnett 92%
Lester Barnett, Jr. 60%
Barbara Martin Blackmon 89%
William Bowles 94%
Billy Broomfield 92%
Thomas Cameron III 51%
William Ward Canon 66%
Charles Wilson Capps, Jr. 92%
Neely Carlton 92%
Robert Clark, Jr. 92%
Joseph Compretta 92%
Scottie Cuevas 83%
Ricky Cummings 92%
Lee Jarrell Davis 78%
Bob Dearing 89%
George Dickerson 89%
James Ellington 60%
Joe Ellzey 92%
Ronald David Farris 87%
George Flaggs, Jr. 92%
Timothy Alan Ford 92%
Jamie Franks, Jr. 92%
Frances Fredericks 92%
Vernon Delma Furniss 89%
Jack Gadd 92%
David Gibbs 92%
Carl Gordon, Jr. 95%
David Green 77%
Joe Grist, Jr. 92%
Daniel Guice, Jr. 92%
Edwin Glenn Hamilton 89%
Frank Hamilton 78%
Alice Harden 92%
Clayton Henderson 91%
William Hewes III 69%
Tommy Horne 51%
Joe Hudson 92%
Michael Janus 69%
Timothy Lamar Johnson 89%
Andrew Ketchings 60%
Ezell Lee 95%
Travis Little 83%
R.L. Livingston 92%
Percy Maples 92%
James Markham, Jr. 91%
Warner McBride 92%
William McCoy 93%
William Miles 92%
William Minor 95%
Thomas Mitchell 92%
T.O. Moffatt 66%
Keith Norris Montgomery, Sr. 33%
Robert Moody 92%
E. Harvey Moss 92%
Clem Mullins Nettles 92%
Diane Peranich 92%
John Raymond Reeves 83%
Thomas Robertson 89%
Valeria Brower Robertson 69%
Eric Robinson 60%
Walter Robinson, Jr. 76%
Clinton Rotenberry, Jr. 80%
Vincent Scoper, Jr. 77%
Eloise Hale Scott 92%
James Simpson, Jr. 92%
Charles Smith 78%
Robert Harold Smith 83%
Mary Stevens 78%
Joseph Thomas Stogner 89%
Bobby Taylor 92%
Billy Thames 89%
Jimmy Thornton 87%
Bennie Turner 93%
Tom Wallace 87%
Johnnie Walls, Jr. 89%
Carmen Wells-Smith 60%
John Robert White 77%
Richard White 66%
Tommy Woods 65%
Charles Young, Sr. 92%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.