Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: National Rifle Association Political Victory Fund

2006 Lifetime Score

Issues: Guns
State Office District Name Party Rating
SD State House 3 Al Novstrup Republican A
SD State House 11 Mark Willadsen Republican A-
SD State House 24 Tim Rounds Republican A
SD State House 25 Roger Hunt Republican A
SD State House 29 Thomas Brunner Republican A
SD State Senate 2 Brock Greenfield Republican A
SD State Senate 4 Jim Peterson Democratic A
SD State Senate 7 Larry Tidemann Republican B
SD State Senate 9 Deb Peters Republican A
SD State Senate 13 Phyllis Heineman Republican B+
SD State Senate 20 Mike Vehle Republican B
SD Secretary of State Shantel Krebs Republican A-
SD Commissioner 3 Tom Hansen A-
SD Commissioner At-Large Dick Kelly A-
SD Commissioner At-Large Jim Lintz A+
Gene Abdallah A+
Jerry Apa A
Jamie Boomgarden A-
Michael Buckingham A+
Joni Cutler B+
Justin Davis A-
Thomas Deadrick A
Thomas Dempster C
Jay Duenwald A+
Joel Dykstra A-
William Earley A
Burt Elliott B+
Bob Faehn A
Jason Gant B+
Margaret Gillespie A-
Mary Glenski D-
Bob Gray A
Tom Hackl A-
Alan Hanks A+
Gary Hanson A-
Dale Hargens A-
Jeffrey Haverly A+
Thomas Hills B+
Gordon Howie A-
James Hundstad B-
Barry Jensen A-
Gary Jerke A
Frank Kloucek A+
David Knudson C+
Gilbert Koetzle C+
Al Koistinen A
Michael Kroger C+
Royal McCracken A+
Ed McLaughlin A-
Kenneth McNenny A
Kathleen Miles B
William Napoli A
Paul Nelson B+
Benjamin Nesselhuf A-
Edwin Olson, Jr. A
Ryan Olson A-
Gordon Pederson A-
J.E. Putnam A+
Valentine Rausch B+
Tim Rave A
Larry Rhoden A+
Donna Schafer A-
David Sigdestad A-
Orville Smidt A
Daniel Sutton A-
Charles Turbiville A-
Donald Van Etten A
Keri Weems A
Hal Wick A-

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top