Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: ACLU of Colorado

2008 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
Mark Ferrandino 100%
K. Jerry Frangas 100%
John Morse 100%
Brandon Shaffer 100%
Paul Weissmann 100%
Bob Bacon 92%
James Isgar 92%
Maryanne Keller 92%
Chris Romer 92%
Gail Schwartz 92%
CO Council Member 1 Susan Shepherd 92%
Abel Tapia 92%
Jennifer Veiga 92%
Suzanne Williams 92%
Debbie Benefield 91%
Kathleen Curry 91%
Randy Fischer 91%
Joel Judd 91%
CO State Senate 14 John Kefalas Democratic 91%
CO State Senate 22 Andy Kerr Democratic 91%
Jeanne Labuda 91%
Claire Levy 91%
CO Commissioner 2 Liane McFadyen Democratic 91%
CO State Senate 11 Michael Merrifield Democratic 91%
Cherylin Peniston 91%
John Pommer 91%
Joe Rice 91%
Christine Scanlan 91%
Judy Solano 91%
CO State Senate 28 Nancy Todd Democratic 91%
Betty Boyd 85%
CO Commissioner At-Large Dan Gibbs Democratic 85%
Sara Gagliardi 82%
Karen Middleton 82%
James Riesberg 82%
Lois Tochtrop 77%
Terrance Carroll 73%
Edward Casso 73%
Don Marostica 73%
Wes McKinley 73%
CO State House 33 Dianne Primavera Democratic 73%
Steven King 64%
John Soper 64%
Joshua Penry 62%
James Kerr 55%
Thomas Massey, Jr. 55%
Michael May 55%
CO State Senate 6 Ellen Roberts Republican 55%
Amy Stephens 55%
Shawn Mitchell 54%
Bob Gardner 45%
CO U.S. Senate Jr Cory Gardner Republican 45%
Marsha Looper 45%
Frank McNulty 45%
CO Public Utilities Commissioner Glenn Vaad Republican 45%
Greg Brophy 38%
Ted Harvey 38%
Kenneth Kester 38%
Larry Liston 36%
CO State Senate 1 Jerry Sonnenberg Republican 36%
Kenneth Guy Summers 36%
Spencer Swalm 36%
CO State Senate 12 Bill Cadman Republican 31%
Mike Kopp 31%
Scott Renfroe 31%
David Schultheis 31%
Nancy Spence 31%
CO State Senate 27 David Balmer Republican 27%
CO State Senate 9 Kent Lambert Republican 18%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top