Rating Group: Free West Virginia

2004 Positions

Issues: Conservative
State Office Name Party Rating
WV U.S. House-3 Evan Jenkins R 24%
WV State House-5 David Pethtel D 25%
WV State House-6 William Romine R 32%
WV State House-8 Bill Anderson, Jr. R 47%
WV State House-10 Frank Deem R 29%
WV State House-11 Bob Ashley R 42%
WV State House-16 Jim Morgan D 20%
WV State House-18 Kelli Sobonya R 47%
WV State House-19 Don Perdue D 26%
WV State House-21 Harry White D 21%
WV State House-32 David Perry D 21%
WV State House-34 Brent Boggs D 33%
WV State House-36 Larry Rowe D 24%
WV State House-39 Ronald Walters, Sr. R 50%
WV State House-40 Tim Armstead R 55%
WV State House-42 Ray Canterbury, Jr. R 26%
WV State House-43 William Hartman D 26%
WV State House-45 Bill Hamilton R 53%
WV State House-50 Mike Caputo D 20%
WV State House-50 Tim Manchin D 17%
WV State House-51 Barbara Fleischauer D 15%
WV State House-51 Cindy Frich R 32%
WV State House-54 Allen Evans R 37%
WV State House-61 Walter Duke R 42%
WV State House-62 John Overington R 50%
WV State Senate-1 H. Jack Yost, Jr. D 22%
WV State Senate-2 Jeffrey Kessler D 19%
WV State Senate-3 Donna Boley R 43%
WV State Senate-4 Mitchell Carmichael R 47%
WV State Senate-4 Mike Hall R 47%
WV State Senate-5 Robert Plymale D 19%
WV State Senate-13 Bob Beach D 21%
WV State Senate-13 Roman Prezioso, Jr. D 19%
WV State Senate-15 Craig Blair R 42%
WV State Senate-15 Charles Trump IV R 37%
WV State Senate-16 Herb Snyder D 19%
WV State Senate-16 John Unger II D 29%
WV State Senate-17 Corey Palumbo D 20%
WV Commissioner of Agriculture Walter Helmick D 19%
WV Mayor-At-Large Andy McKenzie 24%
WV Public Service Commissioner Brooks McCabe, Jr. 14%
WV Commissioner-At-Large Tim Ennis 24%
WV Commissioner-At-Large Dale Manuel 21%
WV Commissioner-At-Large Harold Michael 21%
WV Commissioner-At-Large Scott Varner 21%
Constantino Amores, Jr. 20%
Tom Azinger 26%
Billy Bailey, Jr. 25%
J.D. Beane 21%
Larry Border 53%
Edwin Bowman 19%
Bonnie Brown 13%
Dwight Richard Browning 21%
Greg Butcher 26%
Anita Skeens Caldwell 24%
Anna Laura Stewart Calvert 30%
Thomas Campbell 17%
Samuel Cann, Sr. 26%
Donald Caruth 21%
H. Truman Chafin 25%
Thomas Coleman, Jr. 0%
Kevin Craig 21%
Gerald Crosier 21%
Joe DeLong 25%
Tracy Dempsey 19%
John Doyle 26%
Larry Edgell 20%
John Ellem 45%
Karen Facemyer 29%
Larry Faircloth 33%
John Fanning 24%
Joe Ferrell 26%
Daniel Foster 21%
Ronald Fragale 21%
Eustace Frederick 21%
Jesse Guills, Jr. 38%
Steve Harrison 43%
Barbara Hatfield 16%
Nancy Houston 22%
Greg Howard 37%
Lidella Hrutkay 26%
Jon Hunter 19%
Richard Iaquinta 26%
Robert Kiss 21%
Kerry Steven Kominar 26%
Earnest Kuhn 24%
Margarette Leach 11%
Otis Leggett 39%
Marshall Long 21%
William Louisos 47%
Shirley Love 24%
Virginia Mahan 30%
Dale Martin 21%
Jerry Mezzatesta 16%
Joseph Minard 19%
Sarah Minear 33%
Mike Oliverio II 24%
Brady Paxton 21%
John Pino 20%
Mary Poling 21%
Bill Proudfoot 21%
Donna Reid Renner 22%
Mike Ross 19%
Robert Schadler 30%
Patti Schoen 47%
William Sharpe, Jr. 19%
Stan Shaver 21%
John Shelton 21%
Jody Guthrie Smirl 30%
Lisa Smith 52%
Sharon Spencer 21%
Victor Sprouse 33%
Douglas Stalnaker 26%
W. Richard Staton 21%
William Stemple 30%
Linda Sumner 58%
Sally Matz Susman 26%
Randy Swartzmiller 21%
Robert Tabb 26%
Joe Talbott 22%
Rick Thompson 30%
Ron Thompson, Jr. 21%
Kenneth Tucker 26%
Christopher Wakim 37%
Barbara Warner 22%
Charles Russell Webb 47%
Carrie Webster 20%
Russell Weeks, Jr. 52%
Randy White 20%
L. Gil White 17%
Larry Williams 21%
Bill Wright 26%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.