| State | Office | District | Name | Party | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IA | State House | 3 | Daniel Huseman | Republican | 100% |
| IA | State House | 4 | Dwayne Alons | Republican | 100% |
| IA | State House | 19 | Ralph Watts | Republican | 93% |
| IA | State House | 20 | Clel Baudler | Republican | 93% |
| IA | State House | 21 | Jack Drake | Republican | 100% |
| IA | State House | 67 | Kraig Paulsen | Republican | 100% |
| IA | State House | 97 | Steven Olson | Republican | 40% |
| IA | State Senate | 1 | David Johnson | Republican | 100% |
| IA | State Senate | 9 | Nancy Boettger | Republican | 93% |
| IA | State Senate | 15 | Dennis Black | Democratic | 100% |
| IA | State Senate | 16 | Dick Dearden | Democratic | 100% |
| IA | State Senate | 31 | Bill Dotzler, Jr. | Democratic | 100% |
| IA | State Senate | 35 | Wally Horn | Democratic | 100% |
| IA | State Senate | 39 | Sandy Greiner | Republican | 100% |
| Rich Arnold | 100% | ||||
| Carmine Boal | 92% | ||||
| Daniel Boddicker | 100% | ||||
| Robert John Brunkhorst | 93% | ||||
| Royd Chambers | 93% | ||||
| Betty De Boef | 100% | ||||
| Ervin Dennis | 62% | ||||
| Richard Drake | 50% | ||||
| George Eichhorn | 93% | ||||
| Mary Lou Freeman | 60% | ||||
| Charles Gipp | 100% | ||||
| Polly Granzow | 83% | ||||
| Stewart Iverson, Jr. | 93% | ||||
| Gerald Jones | 100% | ||||
| Ralph Klemme | 87% | ||||
| Charles Larson, Jr. | 100% | ||||
| Steven Lukan | 87% | ||||
| Dolores Mertz | 100% | ||||
| David Miller | 92% | ||||
| Bryan Sievers | 100% | ||||
| Greg Stevens | 73% | ||||
| Roger Stewart | 67% | ||||
| Rich Taylor | 87% | ||||
| Jodi Tymeson | 100% | ||||
| James Van Engelenhoven | 60% | ||||
| Jim Van Fossen | 100% | ||||
| Kenneth Veenstra | 87% | ||||
| John Whitaker | 40% | ||||
| Philip Wise | 100% | ||||
| Mark Zieman | 100% |
Issues:
Guns
How to Interpret these Evaluations
Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.
Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.
