| State | Office | District | Name | Party | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DE | State House | 12 | Deborah Hudson | Republican | 100% |
| DE | State Senate | 1 | Harris McDowell III | Democratic | 38% |
| DE | State Senate | 2 | Margaret Rose Henry | Democratic | 38% |
| DE | State Senate | 3 | Robert Marshall | Democratic | 38% |
| DE | State Senate | 5 | Catherine Cloutier | Republican | 88% |
| DE | State Senate | 7 | Patti Blevins | Democratic | 38% |
| DE | State Senate | 8 | David Sokola | Democratic | 25% |
| DE | State Senate | 13 | David McBride | Democratic | 29% |
| DE | State Senate | 14 | Bruce Ennis | Democratic | 50% |
| DE | State Senate | 16 | Colin Bonini | Republican | 88% |
| DE | State Senate | 21 | Robert Venables, Sr. | Democratic | 75% |
| Thurman Adams, Jr. | 100% | ||||
| Steven Amick | 88% | ||||
| Myrna Bair | 75% | ||||
| Timothy Boulden | 100% | ||||
| David Brady | 57% | ||||
| Gerald Allen Buckworth | 100% | ||||
| V. George Carey | 100% | ||||
| G. Wallace Caulk, Jr. | 71% | ||||
| Dorinda Connor | 38% | ||||
| Nancy Cook | 63% | ||||
| Richard DiLiberto, Jr. | 57% | ||||
| Joseph Di Pinto | 100% | ||||
| David Ennis | 63% | ||||
| J. Benjamin Ewing, Jr. | 88% | ||||
| Evelyn Fallon | 100% | ||||
| Robert Gilligan | 75% | ||||
| William Houghton | 57% | ||||
| Clifford Lee | 75% | ||||
| Vincent Lofink | 50% | ||||
| Pamela Maier | 100% | ||||
| William Oberle, Jr. | 43% | ||||
| Al Plant, Sr. | 40% | ||||
| George Robert Quillen | 100% | ||||
| Bruce Reynolds | 57% | ||||
| Roger Roy | 100% | ||||
| John Schroeder | 75% | ||||
| Arthur Scott | 50% | ||||
| Thomas Sharp | 38% | ||||
| Wayne Smith | 100% | ||||
| Liane Sorenson | 57% | ||||
| Terry Spence | 43% | ||||
| John Still III | 88% | ||||
| Donna Stone | 75% | ||||
| Stephanie Ulbrich | 100% | ||||
| John Van Sant III | 57% | ||||
| James Vaughn | 57% | ||||
| Nancy Hughes Wagner | 75% | ||||
| Charles Welch III | 71% | ||||
| Charles West | 57% | ||||
| Dennis Williams | 50% |
Special Interest Groups
Rating Group: Delaware National Federation of Independent Business
1996 Positions
Issues:
Business and Consumers
How to Interpret these Evaluations
Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.
Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.
