Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: National Association for College Admission Counseling

2009-2010 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
Neil Abercrombie 100%
Gary Ackerman 100%
John Adler 83%
Daniel Akaka, Sr. 100%
Todd Akin 8%
Rodney Alexander 8%
Jason Altmire 75%
Rob Andrews 100%
Michael Arcuri 75%
Steve Austria 8%
Joe Baca, Sr. 100%
Michele Bachmann 8%
Spencer Bachus 9%
Brian Baird 91%
J. Gresham Barrett 0%
John Barrow 58%
Roscoe Bartlett 8%
Max Baucus 90%
Evan Bayh 60%
Melissa Bean 91%
Mark Begich 100%
Bob Bennett 20%
Shelley Berkley 100%
Howard Berman 100%
Marion Berry 80%
Judy Biggert 16%
Brian Bilbray 10%
Jeff Bingaman 100%
Tim Bishop 100%
John Boccieri 91%
Kit Bond 30%
Jo Bonner, Jr. 8%
Mary Bono Mack 25%
Dan Boren 58%
Leonard Boswell 100%
Rick Boucher 75%
Allen Boyd, Jr. 91%
Bruce Braley 100%
Bobby Bright 41%
Paul Broun 9%
Henry Brown, Jr. 8%
Scott Brown 0%
Ginny Brown-Waite 16%
Jim Bunning 11%
Roland Burris 100%
Dan Burton 8%
Steve Buyer 10%
Robert Byrd 100%
Dave Camp 8%
John Campbell III 10%
Eric Cantor 8%
Joseph Cao 58%
Dennis Cardoza 91%
Russ Carnahan 100%
Christopher Carney 91%
Mike Castle 41%
Saxby Chambliss 10%
Ben Chandler III 75%
Travis Childers 50%
Howard Coble 8%
Thomas Coburn 10%
Kent Conrad 100%
Jerry Costello 91%
Mark Critz 50%
Kathy Dahlkemper 91%
Artur Davis 90%
Geoff Davis 16%
Lincoln Davis 83%
Bill Delahunt 100%
James DeMint 10%
Lincoln Diaz-Balart 18%
Norm Dicks 100%
John Dingell 100%
Charles Djou 50%
Chris Dodd 100%
Byron Dorgan 100%
David Dreier 16%
Steve Driehaus 91%
Chet Edwards 83%
Vern Ehlers 25%
Brad Ellsworth 91%
Jo Ann Emerson 16%
John Ensign 0%
Bob Etheridge 100%
Russ Feingold 90%
Bob Filner 100%
Barney Frank 100%
Elton Gallegly 8%
Jim Gerlach 25%
Gabrielle Giffords 91%
Phil Gingrey 10%
Charlie Gonzalez 100%
Carte Goodwin 100%
Bart Gordon 100%
Judd Gregg 12%
Parker Griffith, Jr. 45%
Kay Hagan 90%
John Hall 100%
Ralph Hall 16%
Debbie Halvorson 100%
Phil Hare 100%
Tom Harkin 100%
Jane Harman 100%
Doc Hastings 8%
Wally Herger, Jr. 8%
Stephanie Herseth Sandlin 75%
Baron Hill 91%
Maurice Hinchey 100%
Paul Hodes 100%
Pete Hoekstra 16%
Thomas Holden 75%
Rush Holt, Jr. 100%
Kay Hutchison 10%
Bob Inglis, Sr. 16%
Daniel Inouye 100%
Jesse Jackson, Jr. 100%
Mike Johanns 12%
Timothy Johnson 90%
Tim Johnson 16%
Steve Kagen 100%
Paul Kanjorski 83%
Ted Kaufman 100%
Patrick Kennedy 100%
Dale Kildee 100%
Carolyn Kilpatrick 100%
Mary Jo Kilroy 100%
Jack Kingston 8%
Paul Kirk, Jr. 100%
Larry Kissell 75%
Ron Klein 100%
Herb Kohl 100%
Suzanne Kosmas 91%
Frank Kratovil, Jr. 50%
Dennis Kucinich 83%
Jon Kyl 0%
Mary Landrieu 100%
Tom Latham 16%
Steve LaTourette 18%
Frank Lautenberg 100%
Chris Lee 18%
George LeMieux 0%
Carl Levin 100%
Jerry Lewis 8%
Joe Lieberman 100%
Blanche Lincoln 90%
John Linder 18%
Dick Lugar 20%
Dan Lungren 9%
Connie Mack IV 8%
Dan Maffei 100%
Don Manzullo 8%
Betsy Markey 83%
Jim Marshall 54%
Melquiades Martinez 28%
Eric Massa 100%
Jim Matheson 50%
Carolyn McCarthy 100%
Thaddeus McCotter 16%
John McHugh 25%
Mike McIntyre 58%
Buck McKeon 8%
Michael McMahon 75%
Kendrick Meek, Sr. 100%
Charlie Melancon, Sr. 83%
Mike Michaud 100%
Gary Miller 11%
George Miller 100%
Brad Miller 100%
Walt Minnick 50%
Harry Mitchell 75%
Alan Mollohan 100%
Dennis Moore 100%
Jim Moran, Jr. 100%
Patrick Murphy 91%
Scott Murphy 100%
Jack Murtha 100%
Sue Myrick 8%
Ben Nelson 70%
Glenn Nye III 50%
Jim Oberstar 100%
Dave Obey 100%
John Olver 100%
Solomon Ortiz, Sr. 100%
Bill Owens 75%
Ed Pastor 100%
Ron Paul 0%
Donald Payne 100%
Tom Perriello 90%
Tom Petri 25%
Todd Platts 33%
Earl Pomeroy 100%
Mark Pryor 80%
George Radanovich 0%
Nick Rahall II 91%
Denny Rehberg 8%
Silvestre Reyes 100%
Laura Richardson 100%
Jay Rockefeller IV 100%
Ciro Rodriguez 100%
Mike Rogers 16%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top