Rating Group: Sierra Club California

2009 Positions

Issues: Environment
State Office Name Party Rating
CA U.S. House-2 Jared Huffman D 87%
CA U.S. House-8 Paul Cook R 0%
CA U.S. House-10 Jeff Denham R 20%
CA U.S. House-26 Julia Brownley D 87%
CA U.S. House-35 Gloria Negrete McLeod D 33%
CA U.S. House-37 Karen Bass D 60%
CA U.S. House-47 Alan Lowenthal D 87%
CA State Assembly-2 Wesley Chesbro D 93%
CA State Assembly-3 Dan Logue R 13%
CA State Assembly-4 Mariko Yamada D 93%
CA State Assembly-15 Nancy Skinner D 100%
CA State Assembly-16 Joan Buchanan D 80%
CA State Assembly-17 Tom Ammiano D 93%
CA State Assembly-26 Connie Conway R 7%
CA State Assembly-28 Paul Fong D 87%
CA State Assembly-42 Brian Nestande R 7%
CA State Assembly-53 John Pérez D 67%
CA State Assembly-55 Curt Hagman R 0%
CA State Assembly-56 Manuel Pérez D 47%
CA State Assembly-62 Steven Bradford D 63%
CA State Assembly-64 Isadore Hall III D 53%
CA State Assembly-70 Bonnie Lowenthal D 80%
CA State Assembly-73 Diane Harkey R 13%
CA State Senate-1 Ted Gaines R 13%
CA State Senate-2 Noreen Evans D 80%
CA State Senate-3 Lois Wolk D 87%
CA State Senate-4 Jim Nielsen R 13%
CA State Senate-5 Cathleen Galgiani D 47%
CA State Senate-6 Darrell Steinberg D 53%
CA State Senate-7 Mark DeSaulnier D 92%
CA State Senate-8 Leland Yee D 93%
CA State Senate-9 Loni Hancock D 100%
CA State Senate-10 Ellen Corbett D 100%
CA State Senate-11 Mark Leno D 87%
CA State Senate-13 Gerald Hill D 87%
CA State Senate-14 Tom Berryhill R 8%
CA State Senate-15 James Beall, Jr. D 80%
CA State Senate-17 Bill Monning D 100%
CA State Senate-18 Jean Fuller R 0%
CA State Senate-20 Alex Padilla D 60%
CA State Senate-21 Steve Knight R 13%
CA State Senate-22 Kevin de Leon D 67%
CA State Senate-24 Edward Hernandez D 53%
CA State Senate-25 Carol Liu D 60%
CA State Senate-27 Fran Pavley D 80%
CA State Senate-28 Ted Lieu D 67%
CA State Senate-29 Robert Huff R 7%
CA State Senate-30 Ron Calderon D 53%
CA State Senate-32 Norma Torres D 47%
CA State Senate-34 Lou Correa D 20%
CA State Senate-35 Roderick Wright D 20%
CA State Senate-36 Joel Anderson R 27%
CA State Senate-37 Mimi Walters R 0%
CA State Senate-38 Mark Wyland R 7%
CA State Senate-39 Martin Block D 67%
CA Insurance Commissioner Dave Jones D 80%
CA Supervisor-1 Kevin Jeffries R 0%
CA Supervisor-4 John Benoit 0%
CA Supervisor-5 Saren Simitian D 87%
CA Council Member-1 Gilbert Cedillo D 80%
CA Council Member-2 Paul Krekorian D 80%
CA Council Member-3 Bob Blumenfield D 73%
CA Council Member-6 David Cogdill R 0%
CA Council Member-7 Felipe Fuentes D 47%
CA Council Member-9 Curren Price, Jr. D 69%
CA Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Torlakson D 73%
Samuel Aanestad 15%
Anthony Adams 7%
Elaine Alquist 60%
Juan Arambula 53%
Roy Ashburn 13%
Bill Berryhill 13%
Sam Blakeslee 27%
Anna Caballero 53%
Charles Calderon 62%
Amina Carter 60%
Joe Coto 60%
Dave Cox 20%
Mike Davis 71%
Hector De La Torre 60%
Charles DeVore 20%
Denise Ducheny 53%
Robert Dutton 7%
Michael Duvall 13%
Bill Emmerson 13%
Mike Eng 67%
Mike Feuer 87%
Nathan Fletcher 33%
Dean Florez 79%
Warren Furutani 47%
Martin Garrick 13%
Danny Gilmore 7%
Tom Harman 0%
Mary Hayashi 80%
Dennis Hollingsworth 7%
Alyson Huber 47%
Christine Kehoe 80%
Fiona Ma 73%
Abel Maldonado 20%
Tony Mendoza 53%
Jeff Miller 20%
Pedro Nava 87%
Roger Niello 20%
Jenny Oropeza 64%
Anthony Portantino, Jr. 60%
Gloria Romero 80%
George Runner, Jr. 0%
Ira Ruskin 87%
Mary Salas 73%
Lori Saldaña 80%
Arnold Schwarzenegger 15%
Jim Silva 0%
Cameron Smyth 13%
Jose Solorio 40%
Tony Strickland 13%
Audra Strickland 13%
Sandré Swanson 80%
Alberto Torrico 60%
Van Tran 13%
Mike Villines 13%
Patricia Wiggins 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.