Rating Group: North Dakota AFL-CIO

1999 Positions

Issues: Labor Unions
State Office Name Party Rating
ND State House-3 Andrew Maragos R 75%
ND State House-4 Glen Froseth R 15%
ND State House-8 Jeff Delzer R 15%
ND State House-10 David Monson R 17%
ND State House-11 Scot Kelsh D-NPL 85%
ND State House-13 Kim Koppelman R 25%
ND State House-14 Jon Nelson R 15%
ND State House-14 Robin Weisz R 18%
ND State House-15 Dennis Johnson R 15%
ND State House-18 Eliot Glassheim D-NPL 85%
ND State House-22 Wesley Belter R 23%
ND State House-23 Bill Devlin R 15%
ND State House-26 Jerome Kelsh D-NPL 100%
ND State House-28 Michael Don Brandenburg R 15%
ND State House-29 Chet Pollert R 17%
ND State House-34 Todd Porter R 15%
ND State House-35 Bob Martinson R 46%
ND State House-37 Nancy Johnson R 15%
ND State House-39 David Drovdal R 15%
ND State House-39 Keith Kempenich R 17%
ND State House-40 Matthew Klein R 15%
ND State House-41 Al Carlson R 8%
ND State House-41 Bette Grande R 15%
ND State House-43 Lois Delmore D-NPL 77%
ND State House-44 Blair Thoreson R 15%
ND State House-46 Kathy Hawken R 33%
ND State House-47 George Keiser R 15%
ND State House-47 Larry Klemin R 23%
ND State Senate-1 Stanley Lyson R 44%
ND State Senate-2 John Andrist R 33%
ND State Senate-4 John Warner D-NPL 69%
ND State Senate-6 David O'Connell D-NPL 100%
ND State Senate-8 Layton Freborg R 33%
ND State Senate-11 Tim Mathern D-NPL 100%
ND State Senate-12 Dave Nething R 43%
ND State Senate-13 Judy Lee R 44%
ND State Senate-14 Jerry Klein R 44%
ND State Senate-17 Ray Holmberg R 56%
ND State Senate-21 Carolyn Nelson D-NPL 100%
ND State Senate-24 Larry Robinson D-NPL 89%
ND State Senate-29 Terry Wanzek R 25%
ND State Senate-30 Ron Carlisle R 15%
ND State Senate-34 Dwight Cook R 44%
ND State Senate-37 Rich Wardner R 44%
ND State Senate-39 Bill Bowman R 22%
ND State Senate-40 Karen Krebsbach R 44%
ND State Senate-41 Tony Grindberg R 33%
ND State Senate-44 Tim Flakoll R 33%
ND State Senate-47 Ralph Kilzer R 44%
ND Public Service Commissioner Randel Christmann R 33%
ND Commissioner-At-Large Merle Boucher D-NPL 91%
Ole Aarsvold 92%
Dennis Bercier 100%
Rick Berg 15%
LeRoy Bernstein 23%
James Boehm 23%
Curtis Brekke 8%
Thomas Brusegaard 8%
Rex Byerly 15%
Byron Clark 15%
Audrey Cleary 92%
Duane Lee DeKrey 17%
Rachael Disrud 38%
Bruce Eckre 54%
Mary Ekstrom 69%
April Fairfield 85%
Tom Fischer 25%
Rod Froelich 64%
Pat Galvin 23%
Michael Grosz 15%
Howard Grumbo 85%
Pam Gulleson 85%
G. Jane Gunter 23%
C.B. Haas 23%
Lyle Hanson 77%
Joel Curtis Heitkamp 100%
Gil Herbel 15%
Robert Huether 70%
Roxanne Jensen 46%
RaeAnn Kelsch 23%
James Kerzman 77%
Meyer Kinnoin 67%
Myron Koppang 15%
Aaron Krauter 100%
Edroy Kringstad 44%
Joe Kroeber 77%
Kenneth Kroeplin 78%
Doug Lemieux 75%
Elroy Lindaas 100%
Ed Lloyd 15%
John Mahoney 75%
Deb Mathern 100%
Ralph Metcalf 62%
Phillip Mueller 62%
Duane Mutch 33%
Gary Nelson 44%
Eugene Nicholas 27%
Carol Niemeier 92%
Darrell Nottestad 31%
Clara Sue Price 15%
Dennis Renner 15%
Earl Rennerfeldt 18%
Sally Sandvig 77%
Arlo Schmidt 82%
Randy Schobinger 33%
Dale Severson 23%
Dorvan Solberg 73%
Kenneth Solberg 22%
Bob Stenehjem 33%
Ken Svedjan 15%
Harvey Tallackson 88%
Russell Thane 44%
Laurel Thoreson 23%
Elwood Thorpe 77%
Mike Timm 8%
Steven Tomac 100%
John Traynor 43%
Herbert Urlacher 38%
Francis Wald 17%
Amy N Kliniske Warnke 23%
Darlene Watne 33%
Janet Wentz 15%
Ray Wikenheiser 17%
Lonny Winrich 92%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.