Rating Group: California League of Conservation Voters

2011 Lifetime Score

Issues: Environment
State Office Name Party Rating
CA U.S. House-1 Doug LaMalfa R 2%
CA U.S. House-2 Jared Huffman D 99%
CA U.S. House-8 Paul Cook R 10%
CA U.S. House-11 Mark DeSaulnier D 98%
CA U.S. House-21 David Valadao R 18%
CA U.S. House-25 Steve Knight R 6%
CA U.S. House-26 Julia Brownley D 99%
CA U.S. House-33 Ted Lieu D 96%
CA U.S. House-35 Norma Torres D 80%
CA U.S. House-45 Mimi Walters R 4%
CA U.S. House-47 Alan Lowenthal D 96%
CA U.S. House-51 Juan Vargas D 82%
CA State Assembly-6 Beth Gaines R 20%
CA State Assembly-12 Kristin Olsen R 18%
CA State Assembly-14 Susan Bonilla D 81%
CA State Assembly-24 Richard Gordon D 100%
CA State Assembly-27 Nora Campos D 88%
CA State Assembly-30 Luis Alejo D 94%
CA State Assembly-34 Shannon Grove R 18%
CA State Assembly-35 Katcho Achadjian R 35%
CA State Assembly-37 Das Williams D 94%
CA State Assembly-43 Mike Gatto D 97%
CA State Assembly-48 Roger Hernandez D 94%
CA State Assembly-68 Don Wagner R 12%
CA State Assembly-71 Brian Jones R 13%
CA State Assembly-78 Toni Atkins D 94%
CA State Senate-1 Ted Gaines R 4%
CA State Senate-3 Lois Wolk D 88%
CA State Senate-4 Jim Nielsen R 9%
CA State Senate-5 Cathleen Galgiani D 51%
CA State Senate-6 Richard Pan D 82%
CA State Senate-8 Tom Berryhill R 16%
CA State Senate-9 Loni Hancock D 98%
CA State Senate-10 Bob Wieckowski D 94%
CA State Senate-11 Mark Leno D 99%
CA State Senate-12 Anthony Cannella R 12%
CA State Senate-13 Gerald Hill D 96%
CA State Senate-15 Jim Beall, Jr. D 98%
CA State Senate-16 Jean Fuller R 9%
CA State Senate-17 Bill Monning D 100%
CA State Senate-21 Sharon Runner R 5%
CA State Senate-22 Ed Hernandez D 85%
CA State Senate-23 Mike Morrell R 12%
CA State Senate-24 Kevin de Leon D 94%
CA State Senate-25 Carol Liu D 93%
CA State Senate-27 Fran Pavley D 99%
CA State Senate-29 Robert Huff R 5%
CA State Senate-30 Holly Mitchell D 80%
CA State Senate-32 Tony Mendoza D 87%
CA State Senate-33 Ricardo Lara D 88%
CA State Senate-35 Isadore Hall III D 79%
CA State Senate-38 Joel Anderson R 6%
CA State Senate-39 Martin Block D 93%
CA State Senate-40 Ben Hueso D 94%
CA Secretary of State Alex Padilla D 92%
CA Supervisor-1 Kevin Jeffries 11%
CA Supervisor-4 Curt Hagman 9%
CA Supervisor-5 Joe Simitian N/A 98%
CA Council Member-1 Gilbert Cedillo 94%
CA Council Member-3 Bob Blumenfield 94%
CA Council Member-7 Felipe Fuentes 85%
CA Council Member-9 Curren Price, Jr. 91%
Michael Allen 100%
Elaine Alquist 96%
Tom Ammiano 100%
Bill Berryhill 19%
Sam Blakeslee 28%
Steven Bradford 94%
Joan Buchanan 93%
Betsy Butler 100%
Charles Calderon 77%
Ron Calderon 70%
Amina Carter 91%
Wesley Chesbro 97%
Connie Conway 9%
Ellen Corbett 99%
Lou Correa 53%
Mike Davis 92%
Roger Dickinson 94%
Tim Donnelly 12%
Robert Dutton 4%
Bill Emmerson 12%
Mike Eng 96%
Noreen Evans 99%
Mike Feuer 100%
Nathan Fletcher 35%
Paul Fong 95%
Warren Furutani 86%
Martin Garrick 8%
Linda Halderman 18%
Diane Harkey 14%
Tom Harman 19%
Mary Hayashi 97%
Alyson Huber 58%
Christine Kehoe 96%
Dan Logue 13%
Bonnie Lowenthal 100%
Fiona Ma 94%
Allan Mansoor 12%
Jeff Miller 11%
Gloria Negrete McLeod 69%
Brian Nestande 18%
Chris Norby 12%
Henry Perea 76%
John Pérez 95%
Manuel Pérez 70%
Anthony Portantino, Jr. 92%
Michael Rubio 71%
Jim Silva 9%
Nancy Skinner 100%
Cameron Smyth 17%
Jose Solorio 85%
Darrell Steinberg 98%
Tony Strickland 7%
Sandré Swanson 96%
Roderick Wright 75%
Mark Wyland 5%
Mariko Yamada 98%
Leland Yee 91%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.