Rating Group: California League of Conservation Voters

2010 Positions

Issues: Environment
State Office Name Party Rating
CA U.S. House-2 Jared Huffman D 100%
CA U.S. House-8 Paul Cook R 5%
CA U.S. House-10 Jeff Denham R 0%
CA U.S. House-11 Mark DeSaulnier D 100%
CA U.S. House-25 Steve Knight R 0%
CA U.S. House-26 Julia Brownley D 100%
CA U.S. House-33 Ted Lieu D 100%
CA U.S. House-35 Norma Torres D 71%
CA U.S. House-37 Karen Bass D 100%
CA U.S. House-45 Mimi Walters R 5%
CA U.S. House-47 Alan Lowenthal D 100%
CA State Assembly-43 Mike Gatto D 100%
CA State Assembly-48 Roger Hernandez D 90%
CA State Assembly-71 Brian Jones R 100%
CA State Senate-1 Ted Gaines R 0%
CA State Senate-3 Lois Wolk D 95%
CA State Senate-4 Jim Nielsen R 5%
CA State Senate-5 Cathleen Galgiani D 62%
CA State Senate-8 Tom Berryhill R 6%
CA State Senate-9 Loni Hancock D 100%
CA State Senate-11 Mark Leno D 100%
CA State Senate-13 Gerald Hill D 100%
CA State Senate-15 Jim Beall, Jr. D 100%
CA State Senate-16 Jean Fuller R 10%
CA State Senate-17 Bill Monning D 100%
CA State Senate-24 Kevin de Leon D 100%
CA State Senate-25 Carol Liu D 100%
CA State Senate-27 Fran Pavley D 100%
CA State Senate-29 Robert Huff R 10%
CA State Senate-32 Tony Mendoza D 90%
CA State Senate-35 Isadore Hall III D 90%
CA State Senate-38 Joel Anderson R 5%
CA State Senate-39 Martin Block D 95%
CA Secretary of State Alex Padilla D 95%
CA Mayor-At-Large Mary Salas 100%
CA Supervisor-1 Kevin Jeffries 10%
CA Supervisor-4 Curt Hagman 5%
CA Supervisor-5 Joe Simitian N/A 90%
CA Council Member-1 Gilbert Cedillo 100%
CA Council Member-3 Bob Blumenfield 100%
CA Council Member-6 David Cogdill 0%
CA Council Member-7 Felipe Fuentes 90%
CA Council Member-9 Curren Price, Jr. 85%
CA State Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Torlakson Other 100%
CA State Board of Equalization Diane Harkey R 10%
CA State Board of Equalization Fiona Ma D 95%
CA State Board of Equalization George Runner, Jr. R 0%
Samuel Aanestad 0%
Anthony Adams 10%
Alfred Ernest Alquist 100%
Tom Ammiano 100%
Juan Arambula 95%
Roy Ashburn 5%
Bill Berryhill 5%
Sam Blakeslee 21%
Steven Bradford 100%
Joan Buchanan 95%
Anna Caballero 76%
Charles Calderon 90%
Ron Calderon 85%
Amina Carter 100%
Wesley Chesbro 100%
Connie Conway 5%
Ellen Corbett 100%
Lou Correa 30%
Joe Coto 100%
Mike Davis 95%
Hector De La Torre 86%
Charles DeVore 0%
Denise Ducheny 85%
Robert Dutton 5%
Bill Emmerson 5%
Mike Eng 100%
Noreen Evans 100%
Mike Feuer 100%
Nathan Fletcher 19%
Dean Florez 85%
Paul Fong 95%
Frank Fortino 6%
Warren Furutani 90%
Martin Garrick 0%
Danny Gilmore 14%
Tom Harman 15%
Mary Hayashi 100%
Dennis Hollingsworth 0%
Alyson Huber 43%
Christine Kehoe 100%
Dan Logue 10%
Bonnie Lowenthal 100%
Jeff Miller 5%
Pedro Nava 100%
Gloria Negrete McLeod 70%
Brian Nestande 10%
Roger Niello 10%
Chris Norby 5%
John Pérez 86%
Manuel Pérez 100%
Anthony Portantino, Jr. 90%
Gloria Romero 95%
Ira Ruskin 100%
Lori Saldaña 100%
Jim Silva 10%
Nancy Skinner 100%
Cameron Smyth 5%
Jose Solorio 90%
Darrell Steinberg 100%
Tony Strickland 10%
Audra Strickland 6%
Sandré Swanson 100%
Alberto Torrico 90%
Van Tran 5%
Mike Villines 14%
Roderick Wright 80%
Mark Wyland 5%
Mariko Yamada 100%
Leland Yee 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.