Rating Group: California League of Conservation Voters

2010 Positions

Issues: Environment
State Office Name Party Rating
CA U.S. House-2 Jared Huffman D 100%
CA U.S. House-8 Paul Cook R 5%
CA U.S. House-10 Jeff Denham R 0%
CA U.S. House-26 Julia Brownley D 100%
CA U.S. House-35 Gloria Negrete McLeod D 70%
CA U.S. House-37 Karen Bass D 100%
CA U.S. House-47 Alan Lowenthal D 100%
CA State Assembly-2 Wesley Chesbro D 100%
CA State Assembly-3 Dan Logue R 10%
CA State Assembly-4 Mariko Yamada D 100%
CA State Assembly-15 Nancy Skinner D 100%
CA State Assembly-16 Joan Buchanan D 95%
CA State Assembly-17 Tom Ammiano D 100%
CA State Assembly-26 Connie Conway R 5%
CA State Assembly-28 Paul Fong D 95%
CA State Assembly-42 Brian Nestande R 10%
CA State Assembly-43 Mike Gatto D 100%
CA State Assembly-48 Roger Hernandez D 90%
CA State Assembly-53 John Pérez D 86%
CA State Assembly-55 Curt Hagman R 5%
CA State Assembly-56 Manuel Pérez D 100%
CA State Assembly-62 Steven Bradford D 100%
CA State Assembly-64 Isadore Hall III D 90%
CA State Assembly-70 Bonnie Lowenthal D 100%
CA State Assembly-71 Brian Jones R 100%
CA State Assembly-73 Diane Harkey R 10%
CA State Senate-1 Ted Gaines R 0%
CA State Senate-2 Noreen Evans D 100%
CA State Senate-3 Lois Wolk D 95%
CA State Senate-4 Jim Nielsen R 5%
CA State Senate-5 Cathleen Galgiani D 62%
CA State Senate-6 Darrell Steinberg D 100%
CA State Senate-7 Mark DeSaulnier D 100%
CA State Senate-8 Leland Yee D 100%
CA State Senate-9 Loni Hancock D 100%
CA State Senate-10 Ellen Corbett D 100%
CA State Senate-11 Mark Leno D 100%
CA State Senate-13 Gerald Hill D 100%
CA State Senate-14 Thomas Berryhill R 6%
CA State Senate-15 James Beall, Jr. D 100%
CA State Senate-17 Bill Monning D 100%
CA State Senate-18 Jean Fuller R 10%
CA State Senate-20 Alex Padilla D 95%
CA State Senate-21 Stephen Knight R 0%
CA State Senate-22 Kevin de Leon D 100%
CA State Senate-25 Carol Liu D 100%
CA State Senate-27 Fran Pavley D 100%
CA State Senate-28 Ted Lieu D 100%
CA State Senate-29 Robert Huff R 10%
CA State Senate-30 Ron Calderon D 85%
CA State Senate-32 Norma Torres D 71%
CA State Senate-34 Lou Correa D 30%
CA State Senate-35 Roderick Wright D 80%
CA State Senate-36 Joel Anderson R 5%
CA State Senate-37 Mimi Walters R 5%
CA State Senate-38 Mark Wyland R 5%
CA State Senate-39 Martin Block D 95%
CA Supervisor-1 Kevin Jeffries R 10%
CA Supervisor-5 Saren Simitian D 90%
CA Council Member-1 Gilbert Cedillo D 100%
CA Council Member-3 Bob Blumenfield D 100%
CA Council Member-6 David Cogdill R 0%
CA Council Member-7 Felipe Fuentes D 90%
CA Council Member-9 Curren Price, Jr. D 85%
CA Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Torlakson Other 100%
Samuel Aanestad 0%
Anthony Adams 10%
Alfred Ernest Alquist 100%
Juan Arambula 95%
Roy Ashburn 5%
Bill Berryhill 5%
Sam Blakeslee 21%
Anna Caballero 76%
Charles Calderon 90%
Amina Carter 100%
Joe Coto 100%
Mike Davis 95%
Hector De La Torre 86%
Charles DeVore 0%
Denise Ducheny 85%
Robert Dutton 5%
Bill Emmerson 5%
Mike Eng 100%
Mike Feuer 100%
Nathan Fletcher 19%
Dean Florez 85%
Frank Fortino 6%
Warren Furutani 90%
Martin Garrick 0%
Danny Gilmore 14%
Tom Harman 15%
Mary Hayashi 100%
Dennis Hollingsworth 0%
Alyson Huber 43%
Christine Kehoe 100%
Fiona Ma 95%
Tony Mendoza 90%
Jeff Miller 5%
Pedro Nava 100%
Roger Niello 10%
Chris Norby 5%
Anthony Portantino, Jr. 90%
Gloria Romero 95%
George Runner, Jr. 0%
Ira Ruskin 100%
Mary Salas 100%
Lori Saldaña 100%
Jim Silva 10%
Cameron Smyth 5%
Jose Solorio 90%
Tony Strickland 10%
Audra Strickland 6%
Sandré Swanson 100%
Alberto Torrico 90%
Van Tran 5%
Mike Villines 14%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.