| State | Office | District | Name | Party | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jackie Biskupski | 100% | ||||
| UT | State House | 22 | Sue Duckworth | Democratic | 100% |
| Neil Hansen | 100% | ||||
| Christine Johnson | 100% | ||||
| UT | State House | 28 | Brian King | Democratic | 100% |
| Scott McCoy | 100% | ||||
| Phil Riesen | 100% | ||||
| Ross Romero | 100% | ||||
| Brent Wallis | 100% | ||||
| UT | State House | 35 | Mark Wheatley | Democratic | 100% |
| Sheryl Allen | 0% | ||||
| Trisha Beck | % | ||||
| UT | State House | 42 | Jim Bird | Republican | 0% |
| D. Chris Buttars | 0% | ||||
| David Clark | % | ||||
| Brad Daw | 0% | ||||
| UT | State House | 39 | Jim Dunnigan | Republican | 0% |
| Lorie Fowlke | 0% | ||||
| UT | State House | 8 | Gage Froerer | Republican | 0% |
| Kevin Garn | 0% | ||||
| UT | State House | 65 | Francis Gibson | Republican | 0% |
| Jon Greiner | % | ||||
| UT | State House | 61 | Keith Grover | Republican | 0% |
| UT | State Senate | 25 | Lyle Hillyard | Republican | 0% |
| UT | State House | 38 | Eric Hutchings | Republican | 0% |
| UT | State House | 75 | Don Ipson | Republican | 0% |
| Todd Kiser | 0% | ||||
| UT | State Senate | 13 | Mark Madsen | Republican | 0% |
| UT | State House | 70 | Kay McIff | Republican | 0% |
| UT | State House | 1 | Ronda Menlove | Republican | 0% |
| Michael Morley | 0% | ||||
| Patrick Painter | 0% | ||||
| UT | State House | 54 | Kraig Powell | Republican | 0% |
| UT | State House | 13 | Paul Ray | Republican | 0% |
| Stephen Sandstrom | 0% | ||||
| UT | State Senate | 28 | Evan Vickers | Republican | 0% |
| Michael Waddoups | 0% | ||||
| UT | State House | 5 | Curt Webb | Republican | 0% |
Issues:
Civil Liberties and Civil Rights
How to Interpret these Evaluations
Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.
Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.
