| State | Office | District | Name | Party | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UT | State House | 1 | Ronda Menlove | Republican | 0% |
| UT | State House | 5 | Curt Webb | Republican | 0% |
| UT | State House | 8 | Gage Froerer | Republican | 0% |
| UT | State House | 13 | Paul Ray | Republican | 0% |
| UT | State House | 22 | Sue Duckworth | Democratic | 100% |
| UT | State House | 28 | Brian King | Democratic | 100% |
| UT | State House | 35 | Mark Wheatley | Democratic | 100% |
| UT | State House | 38 | Eric Hutchings | Republican | 0% |
| UT | State House | 39 | Jim Dunnigan | Republican | 0% |
| UT | State House | 42 | Jim Bird | Republican | 0% |
| UT | State House | 54 | Kraig Powell | Republican | 0% |
| UT | State House | 61 | Keith Grover | Republican | 0% |
| UT | State House | 65 | Francis Gibson | Republican | 0% |
| UT | State House | 70 | Kay McIff | Republican | 0% |
| UT | State House | 75 | Don Ipson | Republican | 0% |
| UT | State Senate | 13 | Mark Madsen | Republican | 0% |
| UT | State Senate | 25 | Lyle Hillyard | Republican | 0% |
| UT | State Senate | 28 | Evan Vickers | Republican | 0% |
| Sheryl Allen | 0% | ||||
| Trisha Beck | % | ||||
| Jackie Biskupski | 100% | ||||
| D. Chris Buttars | 0% | ||||
| David Clark | % | ||||
| Brad Daw | 0% | ||||
| Lorie Fowlke | 0% | ||||
| Kevin Garn | 0% | ||||
| Jon Greiner | % | ||||
| Neil Hansen | 100% | ||||
| Christine Johnson | 100% | ||||
| Todd Kiser | 0% | ||||
| Scott McCoy | 100% | ||||
| Michael Morley | 0% | ||||
| Patrick Painter | 0% | ||||
| Phil Riesen | 100% | ||||
| Ross Romero | 100% | ||||
| Stephen Sandstrom | 0% | ||||
| Michael Waddoups | 0% | ||||
| Brent Wallis | 100% |
Issues:
Civil Liberties and Civil Rights
How to Interpret these Evaluations
Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.
Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.
