Search Form
Now choose a category »

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Colorado PTA

2003 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
Norma Anderson 0%
Alice Borodkin 100%
Betty Boyd 100%
CO State Senate 1 Greg Brophy Republican 0%
Dorothy Butcher 100%
CO State Senate 12 Bill Cadman Republican 0%
Terrance Carroll 67%
Michael Cerbo 100%
Lauri Clapp 0%
Mark Alan Cloer 40%
Fran Coleman 60%
Bill Crane 0%
Richard Decker 20%
F. Jim Dyer 0%
Lewis Entz 20%
John Evans 0%
Joan Fitz-Gerald 80%
K. Jerry Frangas 80%
Michael Garcia 60%
Kenneth Marshall Gordon 80%
Peter Groff 100%
Daniel Grossman 80%
Bob Hagedorn 0%
Dale Hall 20%
Deanna Hanna 80%
CO State Senate 30 Ted Harvey Republican 0%
Lynn Christian Hefley 20%
CO State Senate 25 Mary Hodge Democratic 100%
Diane Hoppe 0%
James Isgar 60%
CO State Senate 20 Cheri Jahn Democratic 60%
CO Commissioner 2 Steve Johnson 0%
Ed Jones 0%
Joel Judd 100%
Maryanne Keller 100%
Kenneth Kester 0%
CO Council Member 3 Keith King Republican 0%
CO U.S. House 5 Doug Lamborn Republican 0%
Mark Larson 80%
CO State Senate 15 Kevin Lundberg Republican 0%
Alice Madden 100%
Rosemary Marshall 100%
Michael May 0%
Ronny May 0%
Bob McCluskey, Jr. 0%
Andrew McElhany 0%
CO Commissioner 2 Liane McFadyen Democratic 80%
Michael Merrifield 80%
Shawn Mitchell 0%
David Owen 0%
Angie Paccione 80%
Tom Plant 100%
John Pommer 100%
Ann Ragsdale 80%
Andrew Romanoff 80%
Raymond Rose 0%
David Schultheis 0%
CO Council Member 1 Susan Shepherd 80%
Nancy Spence 0%
Debbie Stafford 0%
Joseph Stengel, Jr. 0%
Stephanie Takis 60%
Abel Tapia 60%
Jack Taylor 0%
Ronald Teck 0%
CO State Senate 24 Lois Tochtrop Democratic 60%
Ron Tupa 80%
Jennifer Veiga 100%
Valentin Vigil 100%
Paul Weissmann 100%
Albert White 40%
Tom Wiens 0%
Suzanne Williams 60%
Sue Windels 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top