| State | Office | District | Name | Party | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CO | U.S. House | 5 | Doug Lamborn | Republican | 0% |
| CO | State Senate | 12 | Bill Cadman | Republican | 0% |
| CO | State Senate | 20 | Cheri Jahn | Democratic | 100% |
| CO | State Senate | 24 | Lois Tochtrop | Democratic | 80% |
| CO | State Senate | 25 | Mary Hodge | Democratic | 100% |
| CO | State Senate | 30 | Ted Harvey | Republican | 0% |
| CO | Commissioner | 2 | Steve Johnson | 60% | |
| Norma Anderson | 25% | ||||
| Bob Bacon | 100% | ||||
| Alice Borodkin | 100% | ||||
| Betty Boyd | 100% | ||||
| Lauri Clapp | 20% | ||||
| Mark Alan Cloer | 60% | ||||
| Fran Coleman | 60% | ||||
| Bill Crane | 20% | ||||
| Richard Decker | 40% | ||||
| F. Jim Dyer | 20% | ||||
| Lewis Entz | 50% | ||||
| John Evans | 40% | ||||
| Joan Fitz-Gerald | 100% | ||||
| Michael Garcia | 100% | ||||
| Kenneth Marshall Gordon | 100% | ||||
| Peter Groff | 100% | ||||
| Daniel Grossman | 100% | ||||
| Bob Hagedorn | 100% | ||||
| Deanna Hanna | 100% | ||||
| Lynn Christian Hefley | 0% | ||||
| Diane Hoppe | 40% | ||||
| James Isgar | 100% | ||||
| Kenneth Kester | 40% | ||||
| Keith King | 0% | ||||
| Mark Larson | 60% | ||||
| Alice Madden | 100% | ||||
| Rosemary Marshall | 100% | ||||
| Ronny May | 0% | ||||
| Andrew McElhany | 0% | ||||
| Shawn Mitchell | 0% | ||||
| David Owen | 0% | ||||
| Tom Plant | 100% | ||||
| Ann Ragsdale | 100% | ||||
| Andrew Romanoff | 100% | ||||
| David Schultheis | 40% | ||||
| Nancy Spence | 40% | ||||
| Debbie Stafford | 40% | ||||
| Joseph Stengel, Jr. | 20% | ||||
| Stephanie Takis | 100% | ||||
| Abel Tapia | 80% | ||||
| Jack Taylor | 40% | ||||
| Ronald Teck | 25% | ||||
| Ron Tupa | 100% | ||||
| Jennifer Veiga | 100% | ||||
| Valentin Vigil | 100% | ||||
| Albert White | 40% | ||||
| Suzanne Williams | 80% | ||||
| Sue Windels | 100% |
Issues:
Marriage, Family, and Children
How to Interpret these Evaluations
Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.
Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.
