Rating Group: PawPAC

2011 Positions on Animal Protection

State Office Name Party Rating
CA U.S. House-1 Doug LaMalfa R 20%
CA U.S. House-2 Jared Huffman D 80%
CA U.S. House-8 Paul Cook R 0%
CA U.S. House-11 Mark DeSaulnier D 100%
CA U.S. House-21 David Valadao R 0%
CA U.S. House-25 Steve Knight R 0%
CA U.S. House-26 Julia Brownley D 100%
CA U.S. House-33 Ted Lieu D 80%
CA U.S. House-35 Norma Torres D 20%
CA U.S. House-45 Mimi Walters R 20%
CA U.S. House-47 Alan Lowenthal D 100%
CA U.S. House-51 Juan Vargas D 80%
CA Governor Jerry Brown, Jr. D 60%
CA State Assembly-6 Beth Gaines R 20%
CA State Assembly-12 Kristin Olsen R 0%
CA State Assembly-14 Susan Bonilla D 40%
CA State Assembly-24 Richard Gordon D 100%
CA State Assembly-27 Nora Campos D 100%
CA State Assembly-30 Luis Alejo D 40%
CA State Assembly-31 Henry Perea D 80%
CA State Assembly-34 Shannon Grove R 0%
CA State Assembly-35 Katcho Achadjian R 20%
CA State Assembly-37 Das Williams D 100%
CA State Assembly-43 Mike Gatto D 80%
CA State Assembly-48 Roger Hernandez D 40%
CA State Assembly-68 Don Wagner R 0%
CA State Assembly-71 Brian Jones R 20%
CA State Assembly-78 Toni Atkins D 100%
CA State Senate-1 Ted Gaines R 20%
CA State Senate-3 Lois Wolk D 100%
CA State Senate-4 Jim Nielsen R 0%
CA State Senate-5 Cathleen Galgiani D 100%
CA State Senate-6 Richard Pan D 100%
CA State Senate-8 Tom Berryhill R 20%
CA State Senate-9 Loni Hancock D 80%
CA State Senate-10 Bob Wieckowski D 100%
CA State Senate-11 Mark Leno D 100%
CA State Senate-12 Anthony Cannella R 0%
CA State Senate-13 Gerald Hill D 100%
CA State Senate-15 James Beall, Jr. D 100%
CA State Senate-16 Jean Fuller R 0%
CA State Senate-17 Bill Monning D 100%
CA State Senate-22 Edward Hernandez D 80%
CA State Senate-23 Mike Morrell R 20%
CA State Senate-24 Kevin de Leon D 80%
CA State Senate-25 Carol Liu D 100%
CA State Senate-27 Fran Pavley D 100%
CA State Senate-29 Robert Huff R 0%
CA State Senate-30 Holly Mitchell D 80%
CA State Senate-32 Tony Mendoza D 100%
CA State Senate-33 Ricardo Lara D 80%
CA State Senate-35 Isadore Hall III D 0%
CA State Senate-38 Joel Anderson R 0%
CA State Senate-39 Martin Block D 100%
CA State Senate-40 Ben Hueso D 100%
CA Secretary of State Alex Padilla D 80%
CA Supervisor-1 Kevin Jeffries R 0%
CA Supervisor-5 Saren Simitian D 100%
CA Council Member-1 Gilbert Cedillo N/A 100%
CA Council Member-3 Bob Blumenfield N/A 100%
CA Council Member-7 Felipe Fuentes N/A 80%
CA Council Member-9 Curren Price, Jr. N/A 80%
CA State Board of Equalization Diane Harkey R 0%
CA State Board of Equalization Fiona Ma D 80%
Michael Allen 100%
Elaine Alquist 100%
Tom Ammiano 100%
Bill Berryhill 20%
Sam Blakeslee 80%
Steven Bradford 80%
Joan Buchanan 40%
Betsy Butler 100%
Charles Calderon 20%
Ron Calderon 80%
Amina Carter 60%
Wesley Chesbro 60%
Connie Conway 0%
Ellen Corbett 100%
Lou Correa 20%
Mike Davis 100%
Roger Dickinson 100%
Tim Donnelly 0%
Robert Dutton 20%
Bill Emmerson 20%
Mike Eng 80%
Noreen Evans 80%
Mike Feuer 100%
Nathan Fletcher 40%
Paul Fong 100%
Warren Furutani 100%
Martin Garrick 0%
Curt Hagman 0%
Linda Halderman 0%
Tom Harman 40%
Mary Hayashi 100%
Alyson Huber 80%
Christine Kehoe 100%
Dan Logue 20%
Bonnie Lowenthal 80%
Allan Mansoor 0%
Jeff Miller 0%
Gloria Negrete McLeod 20%
Brian Nestande 20%
Chris Norby 0%
John Pérez 100%
Manuel Pérez 60%
Anthony Portantino, Jr. 100%
Michael Rubio 80%
Sharon Runner 0%
Jim Silva 0%
Nancy Skinner 100%
Cameron Smyth 40%
Jose Solorio 100%
Darrell Steinberg 100%
Tony Strickland 60%
Sandré Swanson 100%
Roderick Wright 60%
Mark Wyland 60%
Mariko Yamada 100%
Leland Yee 80%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.