Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Clean Wisconsin Action Fund

2003-2004 Positions

Issues: Environment
State Office District Name Party Rating
WI U.S. House 2 Mark Pocan Democratic 100%
WI U.S. House 4 Gwen Moore Democratic 92%
WI U.S. House 6 Glenn Grothman Republican 13%
WI State Assembly 3 Alvin Ott Republican 20%
WI State Assembly 9 Josh Zepnick Democratic 80%
WI State Assembly 16 Leon Young Democratic 87%
WI State Assembly 20 Christine Sinicki Democratic 73%
WI State Assembly 61 Samantha Kerkman Republican 13%
WI State Assembly 77 Terese Berceau Democratic 100%
WI State Assembly 80 Sondy Pope Democratic 93%
WI State Senate 1 Frank Lasee Republican 15%
WI State Senate 2 Robert Cowles Republican 8%
WI State Senate 3 Timothy Carpenter Democratic 100%
WI State Senate 4 Lena Taylor Democratic 73%
WI State Senate 5 Leah Vukmir Republican 13%
WI State Senate 8 Alberta Darling Republican 8%
WI State Senate 10 Sheila Harsdorf Republican 8%
WI State Senate 11 Stephen Nass Republican 14%
WI State Senate 13 Scott Fitzgerald Republican 8%
WI State Senate 14 Luther Olsen Republican 13%
WI State Senate 16 Mark Miller Democratic 100%
WI State Senate 22 Robert Wirch Democratic 83%
WI State Senate 24 Julie Lassa Democratic 58%
WI State Senate 26 Fred Risser Democratic 100%
WI State Senate 27 Jon Erpenbach Democratic 92%
WI State Senate 28 Mary Lazich Republican 8%
WI State Senate 29 Jerry Petrowski Republican 7%
WI State Senate 30 Dave Hansen Democratic 83%
WI State Senate 32 Jennifer Shilling Democratic 83%
WI Supervisor 10 John Ainsworth 13%
WI Supervisor 13 Joe Plouff 92%
WI Public Service Commission Chair Phil Montgomery 20%
WI Railroad Commissioner Jeffrey Plale Democratic 50%
WI Secretary of Transportation Mark Gottlieb Republican 27%
Sheryl Albers 13%
Larry Balow 57%
Garey Bies 13%
Spencer Black 100%
Frank Boyle 87%
Roger Breske 50%
Ron Brown 8%
Charles Chvala 100%
G. Spencer Coggs 83%
Pedro Colon 80%
David Cullen 100%
Russell Decker 91%
Michael Ellis 8%
Jeff Fitzgerald 13%
Steven Foti 13%
Stephen Freese 20%
Donald Friske 13%
John Gard 14%
Curt Gielow 20%
Barbara Gronemus 14%
Scott Gunderson 13%
Mark Gundrum 15%
Eugene Hahn 13%
Tom Hebl 80%
J.A. Hines 20%
Mark Honadel 8%
Gregory Huber 87%
Mary Hubler 47%
Michael Huebsch 14%
Jean Hundertmark 20%
Robert Jauch 75%
Scott Richard Jensen 13%
Suzanne Jeskewitz 13%
DuWayne Johnsrud 13%
Theodore Kanavas 8%
Dean Kaufert 20%
Neal Kedzie 8%
Steven Kestell 13%
Judy Krawczyk 13%
Robin Kreibich 17%
James Kreuser 73%
Shirley Krug 100%
Margaret Krusick 67%
Bonnie Ladwig 13%
Alan Lasee 8%
John Lehman 87%
Michael Lehman 13%
Joseph Leibham 8%
Daniel LeMahieu 13%
Gabe Loeffelholz 13%
Thomas Lothian 15%
Terri McCormick 14%
Dan Meyer 7%
Mark Meyer 75%
Louis Molepske, Jr. 83%
Johnnie Morris 87%
Terry Musser 13%
Ann Nischke 13%
Carol Owens 13%
Mary Panzer 8%
Mark Pettis 13%
Michael Powers 14%
Tom Reynolds 8%
Kitty Rhoades 13%
Jon Richards 100%
Judith Robson 83%
Carol Roessler 8%
Marlin Schneider 93%
Dan Schooff 79%
Dale Schultz 8%
Lorraine Seratti 14%
Gary Sherman 67%
Tony Staskunas 60%
John Steinbrink 60%
Cathy Stepp 8%
Jeffrey Stone 13%
Scott Suder 7%
Barbara Toles 83%
Debra Towns 13%
John Townsend 13%
David Travis 93%
Robert Turner 87%
Gregg Underheim 13%
Terry Van Akkeren 60%
Karl Van Roy 13%
Daniel Vrakas 13%
Amy Vruwink 60%
David Ward 7%
Sheldon Wasserman 87%
Becky Weber 13%
Robert Welch 0%
Steve Wieckert 13%
Annette Williams 100%
Mary Williams 7%
Jeffrey Wood 13%
Wayne Wood 62%
Robert Ziegelbauer 33%
David Zien 8%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top