| State | Office | District | Name | Party | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SC | State House | 2 | William Sandifer III | Republican | 100% |
| SC | State House | 36 | Merita Ann Allison | Republican | 100% |
| SC | State House | 43 | Greg Delleney, Jr. | Republican | 33% |
| SC | State House | 46 | J. Simrill | Republican | 100% |
| SC | State House | 50 | Grady Brown | Democratic | 100% |
| SC | State House | 66 | Gilda Cobb-Hunter | Democratic | 33% |
| SC | State House | 69 | Richard Quinn, Jr. | Republican | 100% |
| SC | State House | 70 | Joseph Neal | Democratic | 25% |
| SC | State House | 76 | Leon Howard | Democratic | 28% |
| SC | State House | 82 | William Clyburn, Sr. | Democratic | 40% |
| SC | State House | 84 | Roland Smith | Republican | 100% |
| SC | State House | 95 | Jerry Govan, Jr. | Democratic | 28% |
| SC | State House | 110 | Harry Limehouse III | Republican | 100% |
| SC | State House | 113 | Seth Whipper | Democratic | 44% |
| SC | State House | 114 | Robert Harrell, Jr. | Republican | 100% |
| SC | State Senate | 19 | John Scott, Jr. | Democratic | 25% |
| SC | Council Member | 3 | George Bailey | Republican | 100% |
| Harry Raymond Askins | 90% | ||||
| John Michael Baxley | 40% | ||||
| William Daniel Boan | 100% | ||||
| Floyd Breeland | 33% | ||||
| Henry Brown, Jr. | 100% | ||||
| Joe Brown | 66% | ||||
| Theodore Brown | 40% | ||||
| Alma Weaver Byrd | 33% | ||||
| Marion Pinckney Carnell | 100% | ||||
| Harry Cato | 100% | ||||
| Wilbur Lucius Cave | 33% | ||||
| Daniel Cooper | 77% | ||||
| William Cotty | 100% | ||||
| James Mann Cromer, Jr. | 80% | ||||
| Thomas Dantzler | 100% | ||||
| Guy Davenport, Jr. | 100% | ||||
| Michael Easterday | 100% | ||||
| John Felder | 60% | ||||
| Ronald Fleming | 100% | ||||
| Dr. Margaret Gamble | 100% | ||||
| James Harrison | 55% | ||||
| Charles Alexander Harvin III | 71% | ||||
| Jesse Edison Hines | 50% | ||||
| James Hodges | 100% | ||||
| Curtis Inabinett | 42% | ||||
| Douglas Jennings, Jr. | 55% | ||||
| Thomas Keegan | 100% | ||||
| Mark Stephen Kelley | 100% | ||||
| Kenneth Kennedy | 80% | ||||
| Marion Hardy Kinon | 100% | ||||
| Herbert Kirsh | 100% | ||||
| James Klauber | 100% | ||||
| Jake Knotts, Jr. | 80% | ||||
| Larry Labruce Koon | 100% | ||||
| Stephen Lanford, Sr. | 100% | ||||
| James Norris Law | 100% | ||||
| Lanny Littlejohn | 100% | ||||
| Walter Lloyd | 40% | ||||
| Rudolph Marion Mason | 100% | ||||
| Jennings Gary McAbee | 83% | ||||
| E. DeWitt McCraw | 90% | ||||
| Woodrow Maxie 'Woody McKay | 100% | ||||
| Willie McMahand, Sr. | 40% | ||||
| Bessie Moody-Lawrence | 28% | ||||
| Denny Neilson | 87% | ||||
| Thomas Rhoad | 80% | ||||
| Rex Rice | 100% | ||||
| Rebecca Davis Richardson | 100% | ||||
| John Riser | 100% | ||||
| Alfred Burgess Robinson, Jr. | 100% | ||||
| Lynn Seithel | 100% | ||||
| Charles Ray Sharpe | 87% | ||||
| Robert Joseph Sheheen | 77% | ||||
| William Smith | 80% | ||||
| Molly Mitchell Spearman | 100% | ||||
| Harry Carl Stille | 100% | ||||
| Eugene Creighton Stoddard | 83% | ||||
| Elsie Rast Stuart | 100% | ||||
| Ronald Parker Townsend | 100% | ||||
| Daniel Tripp | 100% | ||||
| Teddy Norman Trotter | 85% | ||||
| Lewis Raymond Vaughn | 100% | ||||
| Robert Walker | 100% | ||||
| Michael Stewart Whatley | 100% | ||||
| Donny Wilder | 100% | ||||
| Timothy Castles Wilkes | 100% | ||||
| David Horton Wilkins | 100% | ||||
| William Witherspoon | 88% | ||||
| Annette Young | 100% | ||||
| William Jeffrey Young | 60% |
Special Interest Groups
Rating Group: South Carolina National Federation of Independent Business
1995-1996 Positions
Issues:
Business and Consumers
How to Interpret these Evaluations
Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.
Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.
