| State | Office | District | Name | Party | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John Graham Altman III | 100% | ||||
| James Battle, Jr. | 100% | ||||
| Floyd Breeland | 0% | ||||
| Harry Cato | 100% | ||||
| Catherine Ceips | 100% | ||||
| SC | Treasurer | Converse Chellis III | 100% | ||
| Ken Clark | 100% | ||||
| Marty Coates | 80% | ||||
| Daniel Cooper | 100% | ||||
| Thomas Dantzler | 100% | ||||
| Marion Frye | 100% | ||||
| Glenn Hamilton | 100% | ||||
| James Harrison | 100% | ||||
| Gloria Haskins | 100% | ||||
| Jesse Edison Hines | 20% | ||||
| Mack Hines, Jr. | 0% | ||||
| Shirley Hinson | 100% | ||||
| Kenneth Kennedy | 20% | ||||
| Herbert Kirsh | 100% | ||||
| Robert Leach, Sr. | 100% | ||||
| Lanny Littlejohn | 100% | ||||
| Joseph Mahaffey, Sr. | 100% | ||||
| Becky Martin | 100% | ||||
| E. DeWitt McCraw | 100% | ||||
| James McGee III | 80% | ||||
| Vida Miller | 40% | ||||
| Bessie Moody-Lawrence | 0% | ||||
| Anne Parks | 20% | ||||
| Robert Perry, Jr. | 100% | ||||
| Olin Phillips | 100% | ||||
| Lewis Pinson | 100% | ||||
| Edward Pitts, Jr. | 100% | ||||
| Rex Rice | 100% | ||||
| Wallace Scarborough | 100% | ||||
| Donald Smith | 100% | ||||
| Murrell Smith, Jr. | 100% | ||||
| William Smith | 100% | ||||
| James Stewart, Jr. | 100% | ||||
| Scott Talley | 100% | ||||
| Adam Taylor, Sr. | 100% | ||||
| Michael Thompson | 100% | ||||
| Daniel Tripp | 100% | ||||
| C. David Umphlett, Jr. | 100% | ||||
| Lewis Raymond Vaughn | 100% | ||||
| Robert Walker | 100% | ||||
| William Witherspoon | 100% | ||||
| Annette Young | 100% | ||||
| SC | State House | 42 | Michael Anthony | Democratic | 80% |
| SC | State House | 80 | Jimmy Bales | Democratic | 40% |
| SC | State House | 122 | William Bowers | Democratic | 60% |
| SC | State House | 61 | Lester Branham, Jr. | Democratic | 40% |
| SC | State House | 116 | Robert Brown | Democratic | 20% |
| SC | State House | 82 | William Clyburn, Sr. | Democratic | 40% |
| SC | State House | 66 | Gilda Cobb-Hunter | Democratic | 0% |
| SC | State House | 91 | Lonnie Hosey | Democratic | 0% |
| SC | State Senate | 22 | Joel Lourie | Democratic | 20% |
| SC | State House | 109 | David Mack III | Democratic | 0% |
| SC | State House | 40 | Walton McLeod III | Democratic | 20% |
| SC | State House | 74 | James Rutherford | Democratic | 0% |
| SC | State House | 72 | James Smith, Jr. | Democratic | 20% |
| SC | State House | 51 | J. David Weeks | Democratic | 20% |
| SC | State House | 113 | Seth Whipper | Democratic | 0% |
| SC | Council Member | 3 | George Bailey | Republican | 100% |
| SC | State House | 58 | Liston Barfield | Republican | 100% |
| SC | State House | 89 | Kenneth Bingham | Republican | 100% |
| SC | State House | 43 | Greg Delleney, Jr. | Republican | 100% |
| SC | U.S. House | 3 | Jeff Duncan | Republican | 100% |
| SC | State House | 104 | Tracy Edge | Republican | 100% |
| SC | State House | 114 | Robert Harrell, Jr. | Republican | 100% |
| SC | State House | 118 | William Herbkersman | Republican | 100% |
| SC | State House | 110 | Harry Limehouse III | Republican | 100% |
| SC | State House | 65 | James Lucas | Republican | 100% |
| SC | State House | 99 | James Merrill | Republican | 100% |
| SC | State House | 5 | Phillip Owens | Republican | 100% |
| SC | State House | 14 | Michael Pitts | Republican | 100% |
| SC | State House | 2 | William Sandifer III | Republican | 100% |
| SC | State House | 46 | J. Simrill | Republican | 100% |
| SC | State House | 84 | Roland Smith | Republican | 100% |
| SC | State House | 88 | McLain Toole | Republican | 100% |
| SC | State House | 6 | Brian White | Republican | 100% |
Special Interest Groups
Rating Group: South Carolina National Federation of Independent Business
2003-2004 Positions
Issues:
Business and Consumers
How to Interpret these Evaluations
Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.
Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.
