Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: National Active and Retired Federal Employees Association

2002 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
Neil Abercrombie 100%
Gary Ackerman 100%
Daniel Akaka, Sr. 100%
Todd Akin 0%
Wayne Allard 0%
George Allen 0%
Thomas Allen 100%
Rob Andrews 100%
Joe Baca, Sr. 100%
Spencer Bachus 0%
Brian Baird 100%
Richard Hugh Baker 33%
Cass Ballenger 0%
Roscoe Bartlett 0%
Charlie Bass 33%
Max Baucus 100%
Evan Bayh 100%
Bob Bennett 0%
Douglas Bereuter 33%
Shelley Berkley 100%
Howard Berman 100%
Marion Berry 100%
Judy Biggert 0%
Michael Bilirakis 0%
Jeff Bingaman 100%
Sherwood Boehlert 67%
Kit Bond 0%
Henry Bonilla 0%
Mary Bono Mack 33%
Leonard Boswell 100%
Rick Boucher 67%
Allen Boyd, Jr. 67%
John Breaux 0%
Henry Brown, Jr. 0%
Jim Bunning 0%
Conrad Burns 0%
Dan Burton 0%
Steve Buyer 0%
Robert Byrd 100%
Dave Camp 0%
Ben Campbell 0%
Chris Cannon 0%
Eric Cantor 0%
Brad Carson 100%
Julia Carson 100%
Mike Castle 33%
Linc Chafee 100%
Saxby Chambliss 33%
Hillary Clinton 100%
Howard Coble 0%
Michael Collins 0%
Larry Combest 0%
Kent Conrad 100%
Jon Corzine 100%
Jerry Costello 100%
Christopher Cox 0%
Larry Craig 0%
Robert Cramer 100%
Philip Crane 0%
Barbara Cubin 0%
Randall Cunningham 0%
Thomas Daschle 100%
James Davis 100%
Jo Ann Davis 33%
Thomas Davis III 33%
Bill Delahunt 67%
Thomas DeLay 0%
James DeMint 0%
Peter Deutsch 100%
Lincoln Diaz-Balart 0%
Norm Dicks 100%
John Dingell 100%
Chris Dodd 100%
Pete Domenici, Jr. 100%
Calvin Dooley 67%
John Doolittle 0%
Byron Dorgan 100%
David Dreier 0%
Jennifer Dunn 0%
John Edwards 100%
Chet Edwards 100%
Vern Ehlers 0%
Jo Ann Emerson 33%
Philip English 33%
John Ensign 0%
Bob Etheridge 100%
Lane Evans 100%
Terry Everett 0%
Russ Feingold 100%
Michael Ferguson 67%
Bob Filner 100%
Peter Fitzgerald 100%
Ernest Fletcher 33%
Mark Foley 33%
Harold Ford, Jr. 100%
Vito Fossella, Jr. 33%
Barney Frank 100%
William Frist 0%
Jonas Frost III 100%
Elton Gallegly 0%
Richard Andrew Gephardt 100%
Jim Gibbons 0%
Wayne Gilchrest 33%
Paul Gillmor 0%
Charlie Gonzalez 100%
Virgil Goode, Jr. 0%
Bart Gordon 100%
Porter Goss 0%
Daniel Graham 100%
Mark Green 0%
James Greenwood 33%
Judd Gregg 0%
Gilbert Gutknecht 33%
Charles Hagel 0%
Ralph Hall 33%
Tom Harkin 100%
Jane Harman 100%
Melissa Hart 33%
J. Dennis Hastert 0%
Doc Hastings 0%
Robert Hayes 33%
J.D. Hayworth, Jr. 0%
Joel Hefley 0%
Wally Herger, Jr. 0%
Baron Hill 67%
Maurice Hinchey 100%
David Lee Hobson 0%
PA Commissioner At-Large Joseph Hoeffel 100%
Pete Hoekstra 0%
Thomas Holden 100%
Ernest Hollings 100%
Rush Holt, Jr. 100%
Darlene Hooley 100%
John Nathan Hostettler 0%
Amory Houghton, Jr. 33%
Kenny Hulshof 0%
Duncan Hunter 67%
Kay Hutchison 0%
Henry Hyde 0%
Daniel Inouye 100%
Ernest Istook, Jr. 0%
Jesse Jackson, Jr. 100%
William Jefferson 100%
James Merrill Jeffords 100%
William Lewis Jenkins 0%
Christopher John 100%
Nancy Johnson 67%
Tim Johnson 33%
Timothy Johnson 100%
Paul Kanjorski 100%
Ric Keller 0%
Sue Kelly 33%
Edward Kennedy, Sr. 100%
Mark Kennedy 0%
Patrick Kennedy 100%
Dale Kildee 100%
Carolyn Kilpatrick 100%
Jack Kingston 33%
Gerald Kleczka 100%
Joseph Knollenberg 0%
Herb Kohl 100%
James Kolbe 0%
Dennis Kucinich 100%
Jon Kyl 0%
Ray LaHood 33%
Nicholas Lampson 100%
Mary Landrieu 100%
Tom Lantos 100%
Tom Latham 0%
Steve LaTourette 67%
James Leach 67%
Carl Levin 100%
Jerry Lewis 0%
Ron Lewis 33%
Joe Lieberman 100%
Blanche Lincoln 100%
John Linder 0%
William Lipinski 67%
Trent Lott, Sr. 0%
Ken Lucas 67%
Dick Lugar 100%
Don Manzullo 0%
Jim Matheson 100%
Robert Matsui 100%
Carolyn McCarthy 100%
Karen McCarthy 100%
James McCrery III 0%
John McHugh 67%
Scott McInnis 0%
Mike McIntyre 100%
Buck McKeon 0%
Michael McNulty 100%
Martin Meehan 67%
Juanita Millender-McDonald 100%
Gary Miller 0%
George Miller 100%
Zell Bryan Miller 100%
Alan Mollohan 67%
Dennis Moore 100%
Jim Moran, Jr. 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top