or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Louisiana Environmental Action Network

1999 Positions

Issues: Environment
State Office District Name Party Rating
LA U.S. House 1 Steve Scalise Republican 44%
LA Lieutenant Governor Jay Dardenne, Jr. Republican 44%
LA State Senate 3 Jean-Paul Morrell Democratic 89%
LA State Senate 4 Edwin Murray Democratic 100%
LA State Senate 8 John Alario, Jr. Republican 67%
LA State Senate 10 Daniel Martiny Republican 78%
LA State Senate 12 Ben Nevers, Sr. Democratic 44%
LA State Senate 25 Dan Morrish Republican 44%
LA State Senate 27 Ronnie Johns Republican 56%
LA State Senate 30 John Smith Republican 56%
LA State Senate 33 Michael Walsworth Republican 56%
LA State Senate 34 Francis Thompson Democratic 44%
LA State Senate 39 Gregory Williams Tarver, Sr. Democratic 33%
LA Secretary of State Tom Schedler, Jr. Republican 33%
LA Insurance Commissioner James Donelon Republican 67%
LA Mayor At-Large Mitch Landrieu Democratic 89%
LA Public Service Commissioner Foster Campbell, Jr. Democratic 67%
Rodney Alexander 56%
Glenn Ansardi 78%
Diana Bajoie 67%
Robert Barham 44%
Clara Baudoin 89%
Ernest Baylor, Jr. 89%
Ronald Bean 33%
Lambert Boissiere, Jr. 44%
Shirley Bowler 56%
Michael Franklin Branch 22%
Beverly Gourdon Bruce 78%
Emile Bruneau 56%
James Cain 67%
Robert Carter 78%
Thomas Casanova III 22%
Joel Chaisson II 67%
Jacquelyn Brechtel Clarkson 56%
James Joseph Cox 67%
Carl Crane 56%
Donald Cravins, Sr. 56%
Israel Curtis 78%
N. J. Damico 56%
William Daniel IV 56%
Lynn Blackquell Dean 33%
John Dirk Deville 67%
Charles DeWitt, Jr. 56%
John Diez 44%
Jean Doerge 78%
Hunt Downer, Jr. 44%
Reggie Dupre, Jr. 56%
Sydnie Mae Durand 56%
B.G. Dyess 56%
Noble Ellington 44%
Randy Ewing 44%
Robert Faucheux, Jr. 67%
Cleo Fields 67%
Wilson Fields 78%
Daniel Thomas Flavin 56%
Heulette Fontenot 67%
Mickey Frith 56%
Gregory Lee Fruge 44%
Butch Gautreaux 67%
Cedric Bradford Glover 78%
Kyle Mark Green 78%
Elcie Guillory 89%
John Joseph Hainkel, Jr. 22%
Alexander Heaton 56%
Troy Hebert 56%
Francis Heitmeier 44%
Herman Ray Hill 67%
Donald Hines 56%
Melvin Lee Holden 89%
Ken Hollis 56%
Roy Hopkins 44%
Charles Irvin Hudson 78%
Willie Hunter, Jr. 89%
Kay Iles 89%
Paulette Riley Irons 33%
Louis Jenkins 44%
Raymond Jetson 56%
Jon Johnson 56%
Charles Jones 67%
Donald Kennard 44%
Lelon Kenney 56%
Louis Lambert, Jr. 67%
Charles Lancaster, Jr. 56%
Jerry Luke LeBlanc 67%
Arthur Lentini 33%
Max Malone 22%
Robert Marionneaux, Jr. 67%
Jay Bowen McCallum 44%
Charles McDonald 56%
F. Charles McMains, Jr. 56%
Michael Michot 44%
Billy Montgomery 56%
Kenneth Odinet, Sr. 67%
Anthony Richard Perkins 44%
Wilfred Pierre 67%
Gillis Pinac 44%
Henry Powell 44%
Renee Gill Pratt 89%
Roy Quezaire, Jr. 78%
Charles Riddle III 89%
Michael Robichaux 67%
Craig Romero 44%
Errol Romero 44%
Joe Salter 44%
Matthew Schneider III 56%
Melinda Schwegmann 78%
B.L. Shaw 44%
John Siracusa 44%
Jack Smith 44%
Kenneth Smith 44%
Jennifer Sneed 56%
Victor Stelly 44%
Gerald Theunissen 33%
Jerry Thomas 33%
Tom Thornhill 78%
Joseph Toomy 67%
John Travis 56%
Warren Triche, Jr. 67%
J. Chris Ullo 56%
Wayne Waddell 56%
Thomas Warner 56%
Sharon Weston 78%
Pinkie Carolyn Wilkerson 78%
Cynthia Willard-Lewis 89%
Stephen Windhorst 56%
Diane Winston 56%
Ernest Wooton 78%
Thomas Wright 56%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top