or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Louisiana Environmental Action Network

1997 Positions

Issues: Environment
State Office District Name Party Rating
LA U.S. House 1 Steve Scalise Republican 42%
LA Lieutenant Governor Jay Dardenne, Jr. Republican 67%
LA State Senate 3 Jean-Paul Morrell Democratic 90%
LA State Senate 4 Edwin Murray Democratic 83%
LA State Senate 8 John Alario, Jr. Republican 42%
LA State Senate 10 Daniel Martiny Republican 42%
LA State Senate 25 Dan Morrish Republican 30%
LA State Senate 27 Ronnie Johns Republican 67%
LA State Senate 30 John Smith Republican 25%
LA State Senate 33 Michael Walsworth Republican 50%
LA State Senate 34 Francis Thompson Democratic 50%
LA State Senate 39 Gregory Williams Tarver, Sr. Democratic 63%
LA Secretary of State Tom Schedler, Jr. Republican 56%
LA Insurance Commissioner James Donelon Republican 64%
LA Mayor At-Large Mitch Landrieu Democratic 82%
LA Public Service Commissioner Foster Campbell, Jr. Democratic 100%
Rodney Alexander 27%
Glenn Ansardi 58%
Diana Bajoie 57%
Robert Barham 67%
Clara Baudoin 82%
Ernest Baylor, Jr. 83%
Ronald Bean 56%
Shirley Bowler 33%
Michael Franklin Branch 56%
Beverly Gourdon Bruce 64%
Emile Bruneau 42%
James Cain 63%
Robert Carter 78%
Thomas Casanova III 75%
Joel Chaisson II 42%
Jacquelyn Brechtel Clarkson 42%
James Joseph Cox 89%
Carl Crane 45%
Donald Cravins, Sr. 100%
Israel Curtis 73%
N. J. Damico 42%
William Daniel IV 50%
Lynn Blackquell Dean 44%
John Dirk Deville 33%
Charles DeWitt, Jr. 42%
John Diez 33%
Jean Doerge 45%
Hunt Downer, Jr. 60%
Reggie Dupre, Jr. 58%
Sydnie Mae Durand 45%
B.G. Dyess 50%
Noble Ellington 57%
Randy Ewing 63%
Robert Faucheux, Jr. 50%
Wilson Fields 100%
Daniel Thomas Flavin 42%
Heulette Fontenot 27%
Mickey Frith 55%
Gregory Lee Fruge 42%
Butch Gautreaux 42%
Cedric Bradford Glover 56%
Kyle Mark Green 73%
Elcie Guillory 83%
John Joseph Hainkel, Jr. 57%
Alexander Heaton 42%
Troy Hebert 60%
Francis Heitmeier 56%
Herman Ray Hill 45%
Donald Hines 56%
Melvin Lee Holden 83%
Ken Hollis 67%
Roy Hopkins 40%
Charles Irvin Hudson 63%
Willie Hunter, Jr. 83%
Kay Iles 67%
Paulette Riley Irons 88%
Louis Jenkins 29%
Raymond Jetson 80%
Jon Johnson 67%
Charles Jones 86%
Donald Kennard 42%
Lelon Kenney 50%
Louis Lambert, Jr. 83%
Charles Lancaster, Jr. 33%
Jerry Luke LeBlanc 40%
Arthur Lentini 75%
Max Malone 56%
Robert Marionneaux, Jr. 70%
Jay Bowen McCallum 42%
Charles McDonald 36%
F. Charles McMains, Jr. 42%
Michael Michot 33%
Billy Montgomery 55%
Kenneth Odinet, Sr. 42%
Anthony Richard Perkins 33%
Wilfred Pierre 73%
Gillis Pinac 42%
Henry Powell 20%
Renee Gill Pratt 82%
Roy Quezaire, Jr. 83%
Charles Riddle III 60%
Michael Robichaux 89%
Craig Romero 50%
Errol Romero 73%
Joe Salter 42%
Matthew Schneider III 42%
B.L. Shaw 42%
John Siracusa 56%
Jack Smith 36%
Kenneth Smith 56%
R.H. Strain 30%
Gerald Theunissen 56%
Jerry Thomas 36%
Tom Thornhill 50%
Joseph Toomy 58%
John Travis 58%
Warren Triche, Jr. 40%
J. Chris Ullo 78%
Thomas Warner 42%
Sharon Weston 70%
Pinkie Carolyn Wilkerson 83%
Cynthia Willard-Lewis 83%
Stephen Windhorst 42%
Diane Winston 42%
Thomas Wright 58%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top