Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Planned Parenthood Pennsylvania Advocates

1998 Positions on Reproductive Rights

State Office District Name Party Rating
PA U.S. House 15 Charlie Dent Republican 100%
PA State House 18 Gene DiGirolamo Republican 0%
PA State House 26 Timothy Hennessey Republican 0%
PA State House 33 Frank Dermody Democratic 100%
PA State House 34 Paul Costa Democratic 0%
PA State House 53 Robert Godshall Republican 50%
PA State House 76 Michael Hanna, Sr. Democratic 0%
PA State House 93 Ron Miller Republican 50%
PA State House 96 P. Michael Sturla Democratic 100%
PA State House 105 Ronald Marsico Republican 0%
PA State House 120 Phyllis Mundy Democratic 100%
PA State House 127 Thomas Caltagirone Democratic 0%
PA State House 136 Robert Freeman Democratic 100%
PA State House 145 Paul Clymer Republican 0%
PA State House 158 Chris Ross Republican 100%
PA State House 159 Thaddeus Kirkland Democratic 100%
PA State House 160 Steve Barrar Republican 0%
PA State House 163 Nicholas Micozzie Republican 0%
PA State House 165 William Adolph, Jr. Republican 0%
PA State House 166 Gregory Vitali Democratic 100%
PA State House 177 John Taylor Republican 0%
PA State House 183 Julie Harhart Republican 0%
PA State House 184 William Keller Democratic 0%
PA State House 188 James Roebuck, Jr. Democratic 100%
PA State House 192 Louise Williams Bishop Democratic 100%
PA State House 203 Dwight Evans Democratic 100%
PA State Senate 2 Tina Tartaglione Democratic 100%
PA State Senate 6 Robert Tomlinson Republican 0%
PA State Senate 8 Anthony Williams Democratic 100%
PA State Senate 10 Charles McIlhinney, Jr. Republican 100%
PA State Senate 12 Stewart Greenleaf Republican 100%
PA State Senate 16 Pat Browne Republican 0%
PA State Senate 18 Lisa Boscola Democratic 50%
PA State Senate 21 Scott Hutchinson Republican 0%
PA State Senate 29 Dave Argall Republican 0%
PA State Senate 32 Richard Kasunic Democratic 0%
PA State Senate 46 Timothy Solobay Democratic 0%
Bob Allen 0%
Thomas Armstrong 50%
Ellen Bard 100%
John Barley 0%
Joseph Battisto 0%
Linda Bebko-Jones 100%
Kevin Blaum 0%
Leonard Bodack 0%
David Brightbill 100%
Italo Cappabianca 0%
Andrew Carn 100%
James Casorio, Jr. 100%
Lita Indzel Cohen 100%
Nicholas Colafella 0%
Joe Conti 100%
Roy Cornell 100%
Jeffrey Coy 50%
Lawrence Curry 100%
Mary Ann Dailey 0%
Robert Donatucci 0%
Todd Eachus 0%
John Fichter 0%
Thomas Gannon 0%
Frank Gigliotti 0%
Joseph Gladeck, Jr. 100%
Michael Gruitza 0%
Jeffrey Earl Habay 0%
Melissa Hart 0%
George Hasay 0%
Arthur Hershey 0%
Edwin Holl 0%
Michael Horsey 50%
Harold James 100%
Babette Josephs 100%
George Kenney, Jr. 0%
Frank LaGrotta 0%
Susan Laughlin 0%
Marie Lederer 0%
Dennis Leh 0%
Victor John Lescovitz 0%
David Levdansky 100%
F. Joseph Loeper 0%
Stephen Maitland 0%
Kathy Manderino 100%
Jennifer Mann 100%
Albert Masland 0%
David Mayernik 0%
Anthony Melio 0%
Robert Mellow 0%
Thomas Michlovic 100%
John Myers 100%
Jerry Nailor 50%
Dennis O'Brien 0%
Frank Oliver, Sr. 100%
John Perzel 0%
Timothy Pesci 0%
Thomas Petrone 0%
John Pippy 0%
Joseph Preston, Jr. 100%
Benjamin Ramos 100%
Ronald Raymond 0%
Roy Reinard 100%
William Rieger 0%
William Russell Robinson 100%
T.J. Rooney 100%
Carole Rubley 100%
Matthew Ryan 0%
Thomas Scrimenti 0%
Frank Serafini 0%
Bruce Smith 100%
Donald William Snyder 100%
Edward Staback 0%
Jess Stairs 0%
Sara Steelman 100%
Stephen Stetler 100%
Thomas Stevenson 0%
Thomas Tangretti 0%
Guy Travaglio, Jr. 0%
Leo Trich, Jr. 0%
Terry Van Horne 100%
Michael Veon 0%
Don Walko 100%
Michael Waugh 0%
Noah Wenger 0%
Constance Williams 100%
Chris Wogan 0%
Edward Wojnaroski, Sr. 0%
Matthew Wright 0%
Thomas Yewcic 0%
Peter Zug 0%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top