Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Alaska National Federation of Independent Business

2009-2010 Positions (House Only)

State Office District Name Party Rating
AK State House 2 Tammie Wilson Republican 100%
AK State House 4 Scott Kawasaki Democratic 36%
AK State House 7 Wes Keller Republican 100%
AK State House 10 Mark Neuman Republican 100%
AK State House 11 Bill Stoltze Republican 100%
AK State House 14 Max Gruenberg, Jr. Democratic 27%
AK State House 18 Les Gara Democratic 18%
AK State House 19 Lindsey Holmes Republican 18%
AK State House 21 Craig Johnson Republican 100%
AK State House 22 Chris Tuck Democratic 45%
AK State House 23 Bob Lynn Republican 82%
AK State House 24 Charisse Millett Republican 100%
AK State House 27 Mike Hawker Republican 100%
AK State House 28 Mike Chenault Republican 100%
AK State House 29 Kurt Olson Republican 100%
AK State House 30 Paul Seaton Republican 82%
AK State House 31 Cathy Muñoz Republican 80%
AK State House 33 Peggy Wilson Republican 100%
AK State House 35 Alan Austerman Republican 91%
AK State House 36 Bryce Edgmon Democratic 91%
AK State House 37 Bob Herron Democratic 73%
AK State House 38 David Guttenberg Democratic 27%
AK State House 39 Neal Foster Democratic 60%
AK State Senate A John Coghill, Jr. Republican 100%
AK State Senate H Berta Gardner Democratic 18%
AK State Senate M Anna Fairclough Republican 100%
AK Mayor At-Large Reggie Joule Democratic 91%
Bob Buch 27%
Sharon Cissna 27%
Harry Crawford, Jr. 27%
Nancy Dahlstrom 100%
Mike Doogan 9%
Carl Gatto 91%
John Harris 100%
Kyle Johansen 100%
Mike Kelly 100%
Beth Kerttula 18%
Pete Petersen 45%
Jay Ramras 100%
Woodie Salmon 22%
Bill Thomas, Jr. 91%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top