| State | Office | District | Name | Party | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WI | State Assembly | 1 | Garey Bies | Republican | 91% |
| WI | State Assembly | 27 | Steven Kestell | Republican | 100% |
| WI | State Assembly | 33 | Stephen Nass | Republican | 87% |
| WI | State Assembly | 69 | Scott Suder | Republican | 100% |
| WI | State Assembly | 87 | Mary Williams | Republican | 75% |
| WI | State Senate | 1 | Frank Lasee | Republican | 100% |
| WI | State Senate | 5 | Leah Vukmir | Republican | 93% |
| WI | State Senate | 9 | Joseph Leibham | Republican | 100% |
| WI | State Senate | 13 | Scott Fitzgerald | Republican | 100% |
| WI | State Senate | 17 | Dale Schultz | Republican | 93% |
| WI | State Senate | 20 | Glenn Grothman | Republican | 100% |
| Sheryl Albers | 100% | ||||
| Steven Foti | 100% | ||||
| Stephen Freese | 100% | ||||
| Curt Gielow | 100% | ||||
| Barbara Gronemus | 64% | ||||
| Scott Gunderson | 100% | ||||
| Mark Gundrum | 100% | ||||
| Eugene Hahn | 93% | ||||
| J.A. Hines | 100% | ||||
| DuWayne Johnsrud | 87% | ||||
| Theodore Kanavas | 93% | ||||
| Judy Krawczyk | 93% | ||||
| Alan Lasee | 100% | ||||
| Thomas Lothian | 100% | ||||
| Terri McCormick | 93% | ||||
| Terry Musser | 100% | ||||
| Ann Nischke | 89% | ||||
| Mark Pettis | 100% | ||||
| Tom Reynolds | 100% | ||||
| Kitty Rhoades | 100% | ||||
| Gary Sherman | 83% | ||||
| Cathy Stepp | 93% | ||||
| Robert Turner | 7% | ||||
| Karl Van Roy | 100% | ||||
| Jeffrey Wood | 100% | ||||
| David Zien | 100% |
Issues:
Guns
How to Interpret these Evaluations
Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.
Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.
