| State | Office | District | Name | Party | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kermit Brashear | 100% | ||||
| Curt Bromm | 100% | ||||
| NE | Attorney General | Jon Bruning | Republican | 100% | |
| NE | Supervisor | 4 | Dennis Byars | Non-partisan | 100% |
| Jim Cudaback | 100% | ||||
| Carol Hudkins | 100% | ||||
| Ray Janssen | 100% | ||||
| James Jones | 100% | ||||
| Mark Quandahl | 100% | ||||
| Jennie Robak | 100% | ||||
| William Wickersham | 100% | ||||
| Ronald Raikes | 90% | ||||
| Robert Kremer | 89% | ||||
| NE | U.S. House | 3 | Adrian Smith | Republican | 89% |
| Roger Ralph Wehrbein | 89% | ||||
| Gerald Matzke | 88% | ||||
| Floyd Vrtiska | 88% | ||||
| Douglas Kristensen | 86% | ||||
| Thomas Baker | 80% | ||||
| Patrick Bourne | 80% | ||||
| George Coordsen | 80% | ||||
| L. Patrick Engel | 80% | ||||
| Pamela Redfield | 78% | ||||
| Elaine Ruth Stuhr | 78% | ||||
| Matt Connealy | 75% | ||||
| Jim Jensen | 75% | ||||
| Donald Pederson | 75% | ||||
| Pamela Brown | 67% | ||||
| Dwite Pedersen | 67% | ||||
| Ardyce Bohlke | 63% | ||||
| Ed Schrock | 63% | ||||
| LaVon Crosby | 60% | ||||
| NE | Director of the Department of Veterans' Affairs | John Hilgert | No Party Affiliation | 60% | |
| Deborah Suttle | 56% | ||||
| Eugene Tyson | 56% | ||||
| D. Paul Hartnett | 50% | ||||
| Shelley Kiel | 50% | ||||
| David Landis | 50% | ||||
| Daniel Lynch | 50% | ||||
| NE | Council Member | At-Large | DiAnna Schimek | Non-partisan | 50% |
| Jerry Schmitt | 50% | ||||
| Nancy Thompson | 50% | ||||
| NE | Council Member | Ward 5 | Donald Preister | Non-partisan | 43% |
| Cap Dierks | 40% | ||||
| Marian Price | 40% | ||||
| NE | Mayor | At-Large | Chris Beutler | 33% | |
| NE | State Senate | 11 | Ernie Chambers | Non-partisan | 25% |
Issues:
Agriculture and Food
How to Interpret these Evaluations
Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.
Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.
