Rating Group: Illinois Environmental Council

1993 Positions

Issues: Environment
State Office Name Party Rating
IL U.S. House-6 Peter Roskam R 63%
IL U.S. House-9 Jan Schakowsky D 89%
IL State House-1 Daniel Burke D 69%
IL State House-16 Louis Lang D 91%
IL State House-20 Michael McAuliffe R 75%
IL State House-22 Michael Madigan D 70%
IL State House-25 Barbara Currie D 89%
IL State House-27 Monique Davis D 56%
IL State House-31 Mary Flowers D 63%
IL State House-73 David Leitch R 38%
IL State House-74 Don Moffitt R 56%
IL State House-76 Frank Mautino D 50%
IL State House-97 Tom Cross R 69%
IL State Senate-6 John Cullerton D 91%
IL State Senate-17 Donne Trotter D 78%
IL State Senate-35 Dave Syverson R 47%
IL State Senate-44 William Brady, Jr. R 39%
IL Director of the Department of Transportation Gary Hannig N/A 58%
IL Commissioner-1 Earlean Collins Other 69%
IL Commissioner-7 Jesus Garcia D 75%
IL Treasurer Dan Rutherford R 44%
IL Board Member-1 James Meyer Other 75%
IL Chairman-At-Large Dan Cronin R 81%
John Ackerman Other 38%
Arthur Berman Other 66%
Judy Biggert Other 63%
Robert Biggins Other 80%
William Black Other 36%
Joel Brunsvold Other 36%
Robert Bugielski Other 69%
J. Burzynski Other 56%
Martin Butler Other 38%
Ralph Capparelli Other 69%
Howard Carroll Other 66%
Robert Churchill Other 44%
Verna Clayton Other 63%
Mary Lou Cowlishaw Other 69%
Lee Daniels Other 75%
Thomas Dart Other 1%
Terry Deering Other 59%
James DeLeo Other 66%
Miguel Del Valle Other 81%
Vince Demuzio Other 69%
Suzanne Louise Deuchler Other 69%
Laura Kent Donahue Other 25%
Walter Dudycz Other 63%
Thomas Aquinas Dunn Other 75%
Judy Erwin Other 86%
Bruce Farley Other 69%
Beverly Fawell Other 75%
Peter Fitzgerald Other 88%
Lauren Beth Gash Other 83%
Adeline Jay Geo-Karis Other 69%
Calvin Giles Other 64%
Kurt Granberg Other 44%
Charles Hartke Other 41%
Brent Hassert Other 44%
Carl Hawkinson Other 63%
Rickey Hendon Other 63%
Douglas Hoeft Other 69%
Ann Hughes Other 38%
Dennis Jacobs Other 38%
Thomas Lee Johnson Other 47%
Tim Johnson Other 41%
Emil Jones, Jr. Other 81%
Lovana Jones Other 52%
Shirley Jones Other 47%
Doris Karpiel Other 75%
Dick Klemm Other 75%
Joseph Kotlarz, Jr. Other 69%
Carolyn Krause Other 75%
Jack Kubik Other 75%
Christopher Lauzen Other 78%
I. Ronald Lawfer Other 69%
Patricia Lindner Other 59%
Edgar Lopez Other 64%
Robert Madigan Other 53%
William Mahar Other 75%
John Maitland, Jr. Other 38%
John McGuire Other 63%
Robert Molaro Other 75%
Andrea Moore Other 81%
Eugene Moore Other 66%
Charles Morrow III Other 52%
Rosemary Mulligan Other 75%
Harold Murphy Other 53%
N. Duane Noland Other 47%
John Philip Novak Other 58%
William O'Daniel Other 63%
Patrick O'Malley Other 75%
Carole Pankau Other 72%
Terry Parke Other 58%
Vincent Persico Other 69%
William Peterson Other 75%
Edward Petka Other 63%
David Phelps Other 39%
James Philip Other 69%
Coy Pugh Other 58%
Steven Rauschenberger Other 63%
James Rea Other 47%
Carol Ronen Other 83%
Tom Ryder Other 41%
Miguel Santiago Other 64%
Skip Saviano Other 70%
Jeffrey Schoenberg Other 100%
Penny Severns Other 88%
William Shaw Other 50%
Todd Sieben Other 63%
Cal Skinner Other 69%
Margaret Smith Other 63%
Ron Stephens Other 56%
Todd Stroger Other 75%
Arthur Tenhouse Other 39%
Arthur Turner Other 48%
Frank Watson Other 38%
Michael Weaver Other 63%
Stanley Blake Weaver Other 50%
Patrick Welch Other 88%
David Wirsing Other 44%
Kathleen Wojcik Other 47%
Larry Woolard Other 41%
Wyvetter Younge Other 53%
Anne Zickus Other 81%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.