Rating Group: Wisconsin Association of School Boards

2005-2006 Positions

Issues: Education
State Office Name Party Rating
WI U.S. House-2 Mark Pocan D 100%
WI U.S. House-6 Glenn Grothman R 17%
WI State Assembly-3 Alvin Ott R 50%
WI State Assembly-9 Josh Zepnick D 100%
WI State Assembly-12 Frederick Kessler D 100%
WI State Assembly-16 Leon Young D 100%
WI State Assembly-20 Christine Sinicki D 80%
WI State Assembly-36 Jeffrey Mursau R 33%
WI State Assembly-38 Joel Kleefisch R 17%
WI State Assembly-41 Joan Ballweg R 50%
WI State Assembly-46 Gary Hebl D 100%
WI State Assembly-61 Samantha Kerkman R 17%
WI State Assembly-63 Robin Vos R 17%
WI State Assembly-77 Terese Berceau D 100%
WI State Assembly-80 Sondy Pope D 100%
WI State Assembly-96 Lee Nerison R 50%
WI State Senate-1 Frank Lasee R 33%
WI State Senate-2 Robert Cowles R 67%
WI State Senate-3 Timothy Carpenter D 100%
WI State Senate-4 Lena Taylor D 100%
WI State Senate-5 Leah Vukmir R 33%
WI State Senate-8 Alberta Darling R 17%
WI State Senate-10 Sheila Harsdorf R 50%
WI State Senate-11 Stephen Nass R 33%
WI State Senate-13 Scott Fitzgerald R 33%
WI State Senate-14 Luther Olsen R 50%
WI State Senate-16 Mark Miller D 100%
WI State Senate-22 Robert Wirch D 100%
WI State Senate-23 Terry Moulton R 33%
WI State Senate-24 Julie Lassa D 83%
WI State Senate-26 Fred Risser D 100%
WI State Senate-27 Jon Erpenbach D 100%
WI State Senate-28 Mary Lazich R 17%
WI State Senate-29 Jerry Petrowski R 67%
WI State Senate-30 Dave Hansen D 100%
WI State Senate-32 Jennifer Shilling D 100%
WI Supervisor-10 John Ainsworth 60%
WI Public Service Commissioner Michael Huebsch 17%
WI Public Service Commissioner Phil Montgomery 17%
WI Railroad Commissioner Jeffrey Plale D 67%
WI Secretary of Transportation Mark Gottlieb R 17%
Sheryl Albers 33%
Chuck Benedict 100%
Garey Bies 17%
Spencer Black 100%
Frank Boyle 100%
Roger Breske 100%
Ron Brown 50%
G. Spencer Coggs 75%
Pedro Colon 100%
David Cullen 100%
Brett Davis 33%
Russell Decker 100%
Michael Ellis 50%
Jason Fields 80%
Jeff Fitzgerald 17%
Stephen Freese 67%
Donald Friske 17%
John Gard 17%
Curt Gielow 33%
Tamara Grigsby 100%
Barbara Gronemus 100%
Scott Gunderson 17%
Mark Gundrum 17%
Eugene Hahn 33%
J.A. Hines 33%
Mark Honadel 17%
Mary Hubler 100%
Jean Hundertmark 17%
Robert Jauch 100%
Suzanne Jeskewitz 17%
Theodore Kanavas 17%
Dan Kapanke 50%
Dean Kaufert 17%
Neal Kedzie 17%
Steven Kestell 33%
Judy Krawczyk 33%
Robin Kreibich 50%
James Kreuser 100%
Margaret Krusick 100%
Andy Lamb 20%
Alan Lasee 33%
John Lehman 100%
Joseph Leibham 17%
Daniel LeMahieu 17%
Gabe Loeffelholz 33%
Thomas Lothian 17%
Terri McCormick 50%
Dan Meyer 17%
Louis Molepske, Jr. 100%
Terry Musser 33%
Tom Nelson 100%
Scott Newcomer 25%
Ann Nischke 17%
Carol Owens 33%
Joseph Parisi 100%
Mark Pettis 33%
Don Pridemore 17%
Tom Reynolds 17%
Kitty Rhoades 17%
Jon Richards 100%
Judith Robson 100%
Carol Roessler 50%
Marlin Schneider 100%
Dale Schultz 17%
Donna Seidel 100%
Mike Sheridan 100%
Gary Sherman 100%
Tony Staskunas 100%
John Steinbrink 100%
Cathy Stepp 17%
Jeffrey Stone 17%
Pat Strachota 17%
Scott Suder 17%
Barbara Toles 100%
Debra Towns 33%
John Townsend 33%
David Travis 83%
Robert Turner 100%
Gregg Underheim 33%
Terry Van Akkeren 100%
Karl Van Roy 33%
Amy Vruwink 100%
David Ward 33%
Sheldon Wasserman 100%
Steve Wieckert 33%
Annette Williams 83%
Mary Williams 17%
Jeffrey Wood 17%
Robert Ziegelbauer 67%
David Zien 17%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.