Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Louisiana Family Forum

2007 Positions on Conservative Values

State Office District Name Party Rating
LA U.S. Senate Jr Bill Cassidy Republican 100
LA U.S. House 1 Steve Scalise Republican 100
LA U.S. House 2 Cedric Richmond Democratic 38
LA State House 1 James Morris Republican 88
LA State House 21 Andy Anders Democratic 50
LA State House 72 Robby Carter Democratic 50
LA State Senate 3 Jean-Paul Morrell Democratic 38
LA State Senate 5 Karen Peterson Democratic 29
LA State Senate 6 Bodi White, Jr. Republican 88
LA State Senate 8 John Alario, Jr. Republican 38
LA State Senate 10 Daniel Martiny Republican 86
LA State Senate 13 Dale Erdey Republican 86
LA State Senate 14 Yvonne Colomb Democratic 25
LA State Senate 15 Regina Barrow Democratic 50
LA State Senate 18 Eddie Lambert Republican 88
LA State Senate 19 Gary Smith, Jr. Democratic 43
LA State Senate 25 Dan Morrish Republican 75
LA State Senate 27 Ronnie Johns Republican 75
LA State Senate 28 Eric LaFleur Democratic 57
LA State Senate 30 John Smith Republican 75
LA State Senate 33 Michael Walsworth Republican 100
LA State Senate 34 Francis Thompson Democratic 88
LA State Senate 35 James Fannin Republican 63
LA Secretary of State Tom Schedler, Jr. Republican 83
LA Parish President At-Large Errol Romero 50
Robert Adley 86
Ernest Alexander 100
Jody Amedee 83
Glenn Ansardi 75
Jeff Arnold 63
Austin Badon, Jr. 38
Diana Bajoie 50
Damon Baldone 38
Robert Barham 86
Clara Baudoin 50
Ernest Baylor, Jr. 38
Gary Beard 100
Walter Boasso 100
Shirley Bowler 88
Sharon Broome 86
Beverly Gourdon Bruce 29
Sherri Buffington 57
Tim Burns 86
Roy Burrell 38
James Cain 86
Donald Cazayoux, Jr. 57
Joel Chaisson II 50
Billy Chandler 75
Carl Crane 88
Donald Cravins, Jr. 80
A. Crowe, Jr. 100
Israel Curtis 29
N. J. Damico 50
William Daniel IV 43
Carla Dartez 29
Charles DeWitt, Jr. 17
Jean Doerge 43
Gordon Dove, Sr. 75
Hollis Downs 86
Ann Duplessis 50
Reggie Dupre, Jr. 67
Sydnie Mae Durand 88
Noble Ellington 86
Rick Farrar 63
Robert Faucheux, Jr. 63
Cleo Fields 50
Heulette Fontenot 86
Mickey Frith 75
Richard Gallot, Jr. 25
Butch Gautreaux 71
Nick Gautreaux 86
Brett Geymann 100
Cheryl Gray Evans 43
Hunter Greene 100
Elbert Guillory 57
Elcie Guillory 71
Mickey Guillory 71
Terrell Harris 14
Alexander Heaton 80
Troy Hebert 63
Francis Heitmeier 80
Herman Ray Hill 63
Donald Hines 67
Ken Hollis 100
Avon Honey 43
Willie Hunter, Jr. 33
Nita Hutter 71
Lydia Jackson 50
Michael Jackson 20
Jalila Jefferson-Bullock 25
Charles Jones 57
Kay Katz 100
Donald Kennard 80
Lelon Kenney 63
Charles Kleckley 88
Robert Kostelka 83
John LaBruzzo, Jr. 100
Juan LaFonta 33
Charles Lancaster, Jr. 88
Arthur Lentini 100
Nick Lorusso 88
Max Malone 100
Robert Marionneaux, Jr. 60
Charles McDonald 50
Joe McPherson 67
Thomas McVea 71
Michael Michot 100
Billy Montgomery 71
Willie Mount 86
Edwin Murray 57
Ben Nevers, Sr. 83
Kenneth Odinet, Sr. 38
Wilfred Pierre 25
Gillis Pinac 63
Loulan Pitre, Jr. 63
Henry Powell 83
Michael Powell 100
Roy Quezaire, Jr. 29
Julie Quinn 100
Harold Ritchie 57
Joel Robideaux 86
Craig Romero 71
Joe Salter 25
Pete Schneider III 100
Derrick Shepherd 43
M. J. Smiley, Jr. 100
Jack Smith 38
Jane Smith 88
Kenneth Smith 86
Karen St Germain 38
Charmaine Stiaes 29
Mike Strain 100
Gerald Theunissen 86
Joseph Toomy 75
Thomas Townsend 38
Donald Trahan 100
Warren Triche, Jr. 75
Jim Tucker 100
J. Chris Ullo 71
Wayne Waddell 88
Monica Walker 38
Patrick Williams 43
Diane Winston 100
Ernest Wooton 75

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top