or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

2001-2002 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
Todd Platts 50%
Richard Pombo 0%
Earl Pomeroy 50%
Deborah Pryce 83%
Jack Quinn 33%
George Radanovich 0%
James Ramstad 100%
Ralph Regula 0%
Denny Rehberg 25%
Silvestre Reyes 40%
Thomas Reynolds 33%
Ciro Rodriguez 33%
Mike Ross 0%
Steve Rothman 100%
Jim Ryun 33%
Martin Olav Sabo 71%
Max Sandlin, Jr. 0%
Rick Santorum 86%
Paul Sarbanes 88%
Jim Saxton 100%
Edward Schrock 33%
John Shadegg 33%
E. Clay Shaw, Jr. 86%
Christopher Shays 100%
Donald Sherwood 33%
Robert Ruhl Simmons 86%
Ike Skelton 0%
Gordon Smith 71%
Nick Smith 0%
Olympia Snowe 83%
Vic Snyder 60%
Hilda Solis 89%
Mark Souder 25%
Arlen Specter 83%
John Spratt, Jr. 33%
Pete Stark 100%
Cliff Stearns 33%
Charles Stenholm 0%
Ted Stevens 33%
Ted Strickland 67%
Bart Stupak 67%
John Sununu 80%
John Sweeney 67%
Tom Tancredo 71%
John Tanner 0%
Ellen Tauscher 100%
William Tauzin 0%
Charles Taylor 0%
Gene Taylor 25%
Craig Thomas 33%
William Thomas 0%
Todd Tiahrt 0%
Ed Towns 78%
Stephanie Tubbs Jones 75%
James Turner 0%
George Voinovich 33%
James Walsh 67%
Zach Wamp 33%
John Warner 75%
Diane Watson 100%
Mel Watt 50%
Anthony Weiner 100%
David Weldon 25%
W. Curtis Weldon 67%
Gerald Weller 40%
Robert Wexler 89%
Heather Wilson 0%
Lynn Woolsey 89%
David Wu 89%
Albert Wynn 89%
Bill Young 60%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top