Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: United States Women's Chamber of Commerce

2004 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
Gary Ackerman 50%
Todd Akin 50%
Rodney Alexander 50%
Thomas Allen 50%
Rob Andrews 50%
Joe Baca, Sr. 50%
Brian Baird 50%
Richard Hugh Baker 50%
J. Gresham Barrett 50%
Roscoe Bartlett 50%
Charlie Bass 50%
Bob Beauprez 50%
Shelley Berkley 50%
Howard Berman 50%
Marion Berry 50%
Judy Biggert 50%
Michael Bilirakis 50%
Sherwood Boehlert 50%
Henry Bonilla 50%
Jo Bonner, Jr. 50%
Mary Bono Mack 50%
Leonard Boswell 50%
Rick Boucher 50%
Allen Boyd, Jr. 50%
Henry Brown, Jr. 50%
Ginny Brown-Waite 50%
Dan Burton 50%
Steve Buyer 50%
Chris Cannon 50%
Eric Cantor 50%
Dennis Cardoza 50%
Julia Carson 50%
Edward Case 50%
Mike Castle 50%
Ben Chandler III 50%
Chris Chocola 50%
Jerry Costello 0%
Christopher Cox 50%
Robert Cramer 50%
Barbara Cubin 50%
Randall Cunningham 50%
Artur Davis 50%
James Davis 0%
Jo Ann Davis 50%
Lincoln Davis 50%
Thomas Davis III 50%
Bill Delahunt 50%
Thomas DeLay 50%
Lincoln Diaz-Balart 50%
Norm Dicks 50%
John Doolittle 50%
David Dreier 50%
Chet Edwards 50%
Vern Ehlers 50%
Jo Ann Emerson 0%
Philip English 50%
Bob Etheridge 50%
Lane Evans 50%
Terry Everett 50%
Tom Feeney 50%
Michael Ferguson 50%
Bob Filner 50%
Mark Foley 50%
Harold Ford, Jr. 50%
Vito Fossella, Jr. 50%
Barney Frank 50%
Elton Gallegly 50%
Jim Gibbons 50%
Wayne Gilchrest 50%
Paul Gillmor 50%
Charlie Gonzalez 50%
Virgil Goode, Jr. 50%
Bart Gordon 0%
Mark Green 50%
Gilbert Gutknecht 50%
Jane Harman 50%
Katherine Harris 50%
Melissa Hart 50%
Robert Hayes 50%
J.D. Hayworth, Jr. 50%
Joel Hefley 50%
Wally Herger, Jr. 50%
Maurice Hinchey 50%
David Lee Hobson 50%
Pete Hoekstra 50%
Thomas Holden 50%
Darlene Hooley 50%
John Nathan Hostettler 50%
Kenny Hulshof 50%
Duncan Hunter 50%
Henry Hyde 50%
Ernest Istook, Jr. 50%
Jesse Jackson, Jr. 50%
William Jefferson 50%
William Lewis Jenkins 50%
Nancy Johnson 50%
Tim Johnson 50%
Paul Kanjorski 50%
Ric Keller 50%
Sue Kelly 50%
Mark Kennedy 50%
Patrick Kennedy 50%
Dale Kildee 50%
Carolyn Kilpatrick 50%
Joseph Knollenberg 50%
James Kolbe 50%
Dennis Kucinich 50%
Ray LaHood 50%
Tom Lantos 50%
Steve LaTourette 50%
James Leach 50%
Jerry Lewis 50%
Ron Lewis 50%
John Linder 50%
Don Manzullo 50%
Jim Marshall 50%
Robert Matsui 50%
Thaddeus McCotter 50%
James McCrery III 50%
John McHugh 50%
Michael McNulty 50%
Martin Meehan 50%
Kendrick Meek, Sr. 50%
Juanita Millender-McDonald 50%
Brad Miller 50%
Alan Mollohan 50%
Dennis Moore 50%
Jack Murtha 50%
Marilyn Musgrave 50%
Sue Myrick 50%
Robert William Ney 50%
Anne Northup 50%
Charles Norwood, Jr. 100%
James Nussle 50%
Jim Oberstar 50%
Dave Obey 50%
John Olver 50%
Solomon Ortiz, Sr. 50%
Thomas William Osborne 50%
Major Owens 50%
Michael Oxley 50%
Ron Paul 50%
Donald Payne 50%
John Peterson 50%
Charles Pickering, Jr. 50%
Todd Platts 50%
Richard Pombo 50%
Earl Pomeroy 50%
Jon Porter, Sr. 50%
Deborah Pryce 50%
George Radanovich 50%
James Ramstad 50%
Ralph Regula 50%
Denny Rehberg 50%
Richard Renzi 50%
Silvestre Reyes 50%
Thomas Reynolds 50%
Mike Ross 50%
Steve Rothman 50%
Jim Ryun 50%
Martin Olav Sabo 50%
Jim Saxton 50%
John Shadegg 50%
E. Clay Shaw, Jr. 50%
Christopher Shays 50%
Donald Sherwood 50%
Robert Ruhl Simmons 50%
Ike Skelton 50%
Vic Snyder 50%
Hilda Solis 50%
Mark Souder 50%
John Spratt, Jr. 50%
Pete Stark 0%
Cliff Stearns 50%
Ted Strickland 50%
Bart Stupak 50%
John Sullivan 50%
John Sweeney 50%
Tom Tancredo 50%
John Tanner 50%
Ellen Tauscher 50%
Charles Taylor 50%
Gene Taylor 50%
William Thomas 50%
Todd Tiahrt 50%
Ed Towns 50%
Stephanie Tubbs Jones 50%
James Walsh 50%
Zach Wamp 50%
Diane Watson 50%
Mel Watt 50%
Anthony Weiner 50%
David Weldon 50%
W. Curtis Weldon 50%
Gerald Weller 50%
Robert Wexler 50%
Heather Wilson 0%
Lynn Woolsey 50%
David Wu 50%
Albert Wynn 50%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top