Rating Group: National Association of Social Workers - Illinois Chapter

1997-1998 Positions

Issues: Social
State Office Name Party Rating
IL State House-1 Daniel Burke D 100%
IL State House-2 Edward Acevedo D 100%
IL State House-12 Sara Feigenholtz D 100%
IL State House-16 Lou Lang D 100%
IL State House-20 Michael McAuliffe R 90%
IL State House-22 Michael Madigan D 80%
IL State House-25 Barbara Currie D 100%
IL State House-27 Monique Davis D 100%
IL State House-31 Mary Flowers D 100%
IL State House-37 Renée Kosel R 50%
IL State House-73 David Leitch R 60%
IL State House-74 Don Moffitt R 50%
IL State House-76 Frank Mautino D 70%
IL State House-82 Jim Durkin R 80%
IL State House-97 Tom Cross R 80%
IL State House-99 Raymond Poe R 60%
IL State House-115 Mike Bost R 80%
IL State Senate-6 John Cullerton D 100%
IL State Senate-17 Donne Trotter D 100%
IL State Senate-30 Terry Link D 100%
IL State Senate-35 Dave Syverson R 60%
IL State Senate-41 Christine Radogno R 100%
IL State Senate-44 William Brady, Jr. R 60%
IL State Senate-57 James Clayborne II D 100%
IL State Senate-58 David Luechtefeld R 80%
IL Supervisor-At-Large M. Maggie Crotty D 90%
IL Commissioner-12 John Fritchey D 100%
IL Treasurer Dan Rutherford R 50%
IL Chairman-At-Large Dan Cronin R 80%
IL Board Member-At-Large Christopher Lauzen R 60%
NA President Barack Obama II D 100%
Mark Beaubien, Jr. 70%
Robert Biggins 40%
William Black 80%
Michael Boland 100%
Larry Bomke 80%
Evelyn Bowles 80%
James Brosnahan 90%
Joel Brunsvold 80%
Robert Bugielski 90%
J. Burzynski 80%
Ralph Capparelli 90%
Elizabeth Coulson 90%
Mary Lou Cowlishaw 60%
Julie Curry 100%
Lee Daniels 80%
Thomas Dart 80%
Steve Davis 100%
James DeLeo 80%
Miguel Del Valle 100%
Vince Demuzio 80%
Kirk Dillard 80%
Laura Kent Donahue 80%
Walter Dudycz 80%
Judy Erwin 100%
Beverly Fawell 80%
Lauren Beth Gash 90%
Adeline Jay Geo-Karis 100%
Michael Giglio 100%
Calvin Giles 90%
Kurt Granberg 90%
Debbie Halvorson 100%
Gary Hannig 80%
Charles Hartke 80%
Brent Hassert 70%
Carl Hawkinson 80%
Rickey Hendon 80%
Douglas Hoeft 60%
Thomas Holbrook 90%
Constance Howard 100%
Dennis Jacobs 100%
Thomas Lee Johnson 50%
Tim Johnson 70%
Emil Jones, Jr. 100%
John Jones 80%
Lovana Jones 90%
Shirley Jones 90%
Doris Karpiel 80%
Howard Kenner 100%
Dick Klemm 100%
Gwenn Klingler 100%
Carolyn Krause 100%
I. Ronald Lawfer 60%
Patricia Lindner 90%
Edgar Lopez 90%
Eileen Lyons 80%
Joseph Lyons 90%
Robert Madigan 80%
William Mahar 80%
John Maitland, Jr. 80%
Kevin McCarthy 90%
John McGuire 90%
Larry McKeon 100%
James Meyer 60%
Gerald Mitchell 60%
Robert Molaro 80%
Andrea Moore 90%
Charles Morrow III 100%
Rosemary Mulligan 100%
Harold Murphy 80%
Judith Myers 80%
Richard Myers 70%
John Philip Novak 90%
Mary O'Brien 90%
William O'Daniel 80%
Patrick O'Malley 80%
Carole Pankau 70%
Terry Parke 40%
Kathleen Parker 100%
Vincent Persico 90%
William Peterson 80%
Edward Petka 80%
James Philip 80%
Steven Rauschenberger 80%
Tom Ryder 60%
Skip Saviano 80%
Jeffrey Schoenberg 100%
Douglas Scott 100%
George Scully, Jr. 90%
George Shadid 100%
William Shaw 20%
Todd Sieben 80%
Sonia Silva 90%
Cal Skinner 40%
Ricca Slone 90%
Margaret Smith 100%
Michael Smith 90%
Ron Stephens 80%
Todd Stroger 90%
Arthur Tenhouse 60%
Arthur Turner 90%
John Turner 50%
Louis Viverito 80%
Ronald Wait 60%
Lawrence Walsh 80%
Thomas Walsh 80%
Frank Watson 80%
Stanley Blake Weaver 80%
Patrick Welch 80%
Richard Winkel, Jr. 70%
David Winters 60%
David Wirsing 60%
Kathleen Wojcik 60%
Larry Woolard 90%
Wyvetter Younge 100%
Anne Zickus 70%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.