Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Americans for Prosperity

2007-2008 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
Gary Ackerman 0%
Daniel Akaka, Sr. 0%
Todd Akin 100%
Rodney Alexander 90%
Wayne Allard 94%
Thomas Allen 0%
Jason Altmire 5%
Rob Andrews 0%
Michael Arcuri 0%
Joe Baca, Sr. 0%
Brian Baird 0%
J. Gresham Barrett 100%
Roscoe Bartlett 95%
Max Baucus 0%
Evan Bayh 18%
Melissa Bean 15%
Bob Bennett 65%
Shelley Berkley 0%
Howard Berman 0%
Marion Berry 0%
Judy Biggert 81%
Brian Bilbray 90%
Jeff Bingaman 0%
Kit Bond 71%
Jo Bonner, Jr. 90%
Mary Bono Mack 75%
Dan Boren 33%
Leonard Boswell 0%
Rick Boucher 0%
Allen Boyd, Jr. 0%
Nancy Boyda 10%
Henry Brown, Jr. 90%
Ginny Brown-Waite 68%
Jim Bunning 76%
Dan Burton 90%
Steve Buyer 80%
Robert Byrd 0%
Chris Cannon 100%
Eric Cantor 100%
Dennis Cardoza 0%
Russ Carnahan 0%
Christopher Carney 5%
Mike Castle 38%
Donald Cazayoux, Jr. 11%
Ben Chandler III 0%
Hillary Clinton 8%
Norm Coleman 44%
Kent Conrad 0%
Jerry Costello 0%
Larry Craig 87%
Robert Cramer 0%
Barbara Cubin 93%
Artur Davis 0%
David Davis 100%
Geoff Davis 95%
Lincoln Davis 0%
Bill Delahunt 0%
James DeMint 100%
Lincoln Diaz-Balart 62%
Norm Dicks 0%
Chris Dodd 0%
Elizabeth Dole 82%
Pete Domenici, Jr. 71%
John Doolittle 95%
Byron Dorgan 6%
Thelma Drake 95%
David Dreier 86%
Chet Edwards 0%
Vern Ehlers 52%
Brad Ellsworth 19%
Jo Ann Emerson 57%
Philip English 62%
John Ensign 100%
Bob Etheridge 5%
Terry Everett 83%
Tom Feeney 100%
Russ Feingold 24%
Michael Ferguson 65%
Bob Filner 5%
Vito Fossella, Jr. 60%
Barney Frank 0%
Elton Gallegly 89%
Gabrielle Giffords 5%
Wayne Gilchrest 37%
Charlie Gonzalez 0%
Virgil Goode, Jr. 86%
Bart Gordon 0%
Judd Gregg 75%
John Hall 0%
Phil Hare 0%
Jane Harman 0%
Robert Hayes 45%
Wally Herger, Jr. 100%
Stephanie Herseth Sandlin 0%
Baron Hill 5%
Maurice Hinchey 0%
David Lee Hobson 74%
Paul Hodes 0%
Pete Hoekstra 95%
Thomas Holden 0%
Darlene Hooley 0%
Kenny Hulshof 74%
Duncan Hunter 95%
Kay Hutchison 76%
Bob Inglis, Sr. 86%
Daniel Inouye 6%
Jesse Jackson, Jr. 0%
William Jefferson 0%
Tim Johnson 55%
Steve Kagen 5%
Paul Kanjorski 0%
Ric Keller 85%
Edward Kennedy, Sr. 0%
Patrick Kennedy 0%
Dale Kildee 0%
Carolyn Kilpatrick 0%
Ron Klein 5%
Joseph Knollenberg 70%
Herb Kohl 0%
Dennis Kucinich 5%
John Kuhl, Jr. 71%
Jon Kyl 94%
Ray LaHood 26%
Nicholas Lampson 35%
Steve LaTourette 43%
Frank Lautenberg 0%
Jerry Lewis 86%
Ron Lewis 90%
Joe Lieberman 18%
Blanche Lincoln 0%
John Linder 100%
Dick Lugar 65%
Dan Lungren 95%
Connie Mack IV 95%
Tim Mahoney 15%
Don Manzullo 100%
Jim Marshall 29%
Melquiades Martinez 76%
Thaddeus McCotter 81%
James McCrery III 95%
John McHugh 45%
Michael McNulty 0%
Kendrick Meek, Sr. 0%
Charlie Melancon, Sr. 5%
Brad Miller 0%
Harry Mitchell 10%
Alan Mollohan 0%
Dennis Moore 0%
Patrick Murphy 0%
Jack Murtha 0%
Marilyn Musgrave 100%
Sue Myrick 90%
Ben Nelson 6%
Jim Oberstar 0%
Dave Obey 0%
John Olver 0%
Solomon Ortiz, Sr. 6%
Ron Paul 88%
Donald Payne 5%
John Peterson 84%
Charles Pickering, Jr. 80%
Todd Platts 57%
Earl Pomeroy 0%
Jon Porter, Sr. 50%
Deborah Pryce 71%
George Radanovich 100%
James Ramstad 38%
Ralph Regula 71%
Denny Rehberg 86%
Richard Renzi 67%
Silvestre Reyes 0%
Thomas Reynolds 81%
Laura Richardson 0%
Ciro Rodriguez 5%
Mike Ross 0%
Steve Rothman 5%
Ken Salazar 0%
William Sali 100%
Jim Saxton 70%
Jean Schmidt 81%
Joe Sestak, Jr. 0%
John Shadegg 100%
Christopher Shays 24%
Heath Shuler 5%
Ike Skelton 0%
Gordon Smith 29%
Olympia Snowe 18%
Vic Snyder 0%
Hilda Solis 0%
Mark Souder 86%
Zack Space 5%
Arlen Specter 50%
John Spratt, Jr. 0%
Pete Stark 5%
Cliff Stearns 95%
Ted Stevens 56%
Bart Stupak 0%
John Sullivan 100%
John Sununu 76%
Betty Sutton 0%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top