Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: National Association of Social Workers

2001-2002 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
Neil Abercrombie 100%
Gary Ackerman 88%
Daniel Akaka, Sr. 100%
Todd Akin 12%
Wayne Allard 0%
George Allen 0%
Thomas Allen 100%
Rob Andrews 88%
Joe Baca, Sr. 100%
Spencer Bachus 14%
Brian Baird 88%
Richard Hugh Baker 12%
Cass Ballenger 12%
Roscoe Bartlett 12%
Charlie Bass 25%
Max Baucus 88%
Evan Bayh 88%
Bob Bennett 0%
Douglas Bereuter 12%
Shelley Berkley 88%
Howard Berman 88%
Marion Berry 62%
Judy Biggert 25%
Michael Bilirakis 12%
Jeff Bingaman 100%
Sherwood Boehlert 38%
Kit Bond 0%
Henry Bonilla 12%
Mary Bono Mack 25%
Leonard Boswell 62%
Rick Boucher 88%
Allen Boyd, Jr. 62%
John Breaux 43%
Henry Brown, Jr. 12%
Jim Bunning 0%
Conrad Burns 0%
Dan Burton 12%
Steve Buyer 14%
Robert Byrd 88%
Dave Camp 12%
Ben Campbell 0%
Chris Cannon 12%
Eric Cantor 12%
Brad Carson 75%
Julia Carson 100%
Mike Castle 25%
Linc Chafee 75%
Saxby Chambliss 12%
Hillary Clinton 88%
Howard Coble 12%
Michael Collins 25%
Kent Conrad 75%
Jon Corzine 100%
Jerry Costello 88%
Christopher Cox 12%
Larry Craig 0%
Robert Cramer 25%
Philip Crane 0%
Barbara Cubin 17%
Randall Cunningham 12%
Thomas Daschle 75%
James Davis 88%
Jo Ann Davis 12%
Thomas Davis III 12%
Bill Delahunt 100%
Thomas DeLay 12%
James DeMint 12%
Peter Deutsch 88%
Lincoln Diaz-Balart 12%
Norm Dicks 75%
John Dingell 100%
Chris Dodd 75%
Pete Domenici, Jr. 0%
Calvin Dooley 75%
John Doolittle 12%
Byron Dorgan 62%
David Dreier 25%
Jennifer Dunn 12%
John Edwards 88%
Chet Edwards 62%
Vern Ehlers 12%
Jo Ann Emerson 25%
Philip English 12%
John Ensign 0%
Bob Etheridge 88%
Lane Evans 100%
Terry Everett 12%
Russ Feingold 88%
Michael Ferguson 25%
Bob Filner 100%
Peter Fitzgerald 25%
Ernest Fletcher 12%
Mark Foley 12%
Harold Ford, Jr. 88%
Vito Fossella, Jr. 12%
Barney Frank 100%
William Frist 0%
Jonas Frost III 88%
Elton Gallegly 12%
Richard Andrew Gephardt 88%
Jim Gibbons 25%
Wayne Gilchrest 14%
Paul Gillmor 12%
Charlie Gonzalez 100%
Virgil Goode, Jr. 12%
Bart Gordon 50%
Porter Goss 12%
Daniel Graham 100%
Mark Green 12%
James Greenwood 25%
Judd Gregg 0%
Gilbert Gutknecht 25%
Charles Hagel 12%
Ralph Hall 25%
Tom Harkin 88%
Jane Harman 75%
Melissa Hart 12%
J. Dennis Hastert 0%
Doc Hastings 12%
Robert Hayes 12%
J.D. Hayworth, Jr. 12%
Joel Hefley 12%
Wally Herger, Jr. 12%
Baron Hill 75%
Maurice Hinchey 100%
David Lee Hobson 12%
PA Commissioner At-Large Joseph Hoeffel 88%
Pete Hoekstra 12%
Thomas Holden 50%
Ernest Hollings 88%
Rush Holt, Jr. 88%
Darlene Hooley 100%
John Nathan Hostettler 50%
Amory Houghton, Jr. 43%
Kenny Hulshof 12%
Duncan Hunter 12%
Kay Hutchison 0%
Henry Hyde 12%
Daniel Inouye 100%
Ernest Istook, Jr. 25%
Jesse Jackson, Jr. 100%
William Jefferson 86%
James Merrill Jeffords 62%
William Lewis Jenkins 12%
Christopher John 62%
Nancy Johnson 38%
Tim Johnson 12%
Timothy Johnson 75%
Paul Kanjorski 75%
Ric Keller 12%
Sue Kelly 25%
Edward Kennedy, Sr. 100%
Mark Kennedy 12%
Patrick Kennedy 88%
Dale Kildee 88%
Carolyn Kilpatrick 100%
Jack Kingston 12%
Gerald Kleczka 100%
Joseph Knollenberg 12%
Herb Kohl 88%
James Kolbe 25%
Dennis Kucinich 100%
Jon Kyl 0%
Ray LaHood 25%
Nicholas Lampson 71%
Mary Landrieu 62%
Tom Lantos 88%
Tom Latham 12%
Steve LaTourette 0%
James Leach 50%
Carl Levin 100%
Jerry Lewis 12%
Ron Lewis 12%
Joe Lieberman 88%
Blanche Lincoln 88%
John Linder 12%
William Lipinski 71%
Trent Lott, Sr. 0%
Ken Lucas 12%
Dick Lugar 12%
Don Manzullo 38%
Jim Matheson 62%
Robert Matsui 100%
Carolyn McCarthy 88%
Karen McCarthy 100%
James McCrery III 12%
John McHugh 25%
Scott McInnis 12%
Mike McIntyre 62%
Buck McKeon 12%
Michael McNulty 88%
Martin Meehan 88%
Juanita Millender-McDonald 100%
Gary Miller 12%
George Miller 100%
Zell Bryan Miller 57%
Alan Mollohan 62%
Dennis Moore 88%
Jim Moran, Jr. 88%
Jack Murtha 71%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top