Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Federation for American Immigration Reform

2005 Positions

Issues: Immigration
State Office District Name Party Rating
Neil Abercrombie 43%
Gary Ackerman 67%
Daniel Akaka, Sr. 0%
Todd Akin 100%
Rodney Alexander 86%
Wayne Allard 75%
George Allen 75%
Thomas Allen 57%
Rob Andrews 57%
Joe Baca, Sr. 57%
Spencer Bachus 86%
Brian Baird 57%
Richard Hugh Baker 86%
J. Gresham Barrett 86%
John Barrow 86%
Roscoe Bartlett 83%
Charlie Bass 86%
Max Baucus 0%
Evan Bayh 0%
Melissa Bean 71%
Bob Beauprez 86%
Bob Bennett 75%
Shelley Berkley 57%
Howard Berman 57%
Marion Berry 71%
Judy Biggert 71%
Michael Bilirakis 86%
Jeff Bingaman 0%
Tim Bishop 71%
Sherwood Boehlert 71%
Kit Bond 75%
Henry Bonilla 86%
Jo Bonner, Jr. 86%
Mary Bono Mack 86%
Dan Boren 86%
Leonard Boswell 71%
Rick Boucher 71%
Allen Boyd, Jr. 86%
Henry Brown, Jr. 86%
Ginny Brown-Waite 100%
Jim Bunning 75%
Conrad Burns 0%
Dan Burton 86%
Steve Buyer 86%
Robert Byrd 100%
Dave Camp 100%
Chris Cannon 57%
Eric Cantor 86%
Dennis Cardoza 71%
Russ Carnahan 57%
Julia Carson 43%
Edward Case 86%
Mike Castle 71%
Linc Chafee 0%
Saxby Chambliss 75%
Ben Chandler III 86%
Chris Chocola 71%
Hillary Clinton 0%
Howard Coble 71%
Thomas Coburn 75%
Norm Coleman 0%
Kent Conrad 75%
Jerry Costello 71%
Larry Craig 0%
Robert Cramer 100%
Barbara Cubin 86%
Artur Davis 71%
Geoff Davis 86%
James Davis 71%
Jo Ann Davis 100%
Lincoln Davis 86%
Thomas Davis III 71%
Bill Delahunt 43%
Thomas DeLay 86%
James DeMint 75%
Lincoln Diaz-Balart 33%
Norm Dicks 57%
John Dingell 57%
Chris Dodd 0%
Elizabeth Dole 75%
Pete Domenici, Jr. 0%
John Doolittle 86%
Byron Dorgan 75%
Thelma Drake 86%
David Dreier 86%
Chet Edwards 71%
Vern Ehlers 71%
Jo Ann Emerson 86%
Philip English 71%
John Ensign 75%
Bob Etheridge 57%
Lane Evans 57%
Terry Everett 100%
Tom Feeney 83%
Russ Feingold 0%
Michael Ferguson 67%
Bob Filner 43%
Mark Foley 100%
Harold Ford, Jr. 71%
Vito Fossella, Jr. 71%
Barney Frank 43%
William Frist 75%
Elton Gallegly 86%
Jim Gerlach 100%
Jim Gibbons 86%
Wayne Gilchrest 71%
Paul Gillmor 100%
Phil Gingrey 86%
Charlie Gonzalez 57%
Virgil Goode, Jr. 86%
Bart Gordon 71%
Mark Green 86%
Judd Gregg 75%
Gilbert Gutknecht 86%
Charles Hagel 0%
Ralph Hall 86%
Tom Harkin 0%
Jane Harman 57%
Katherine Harris 71%
Melissa Hart 71%
Doc Hastings 71%
Robert Hayes 86%
J.D. Hayworth, Jr. 86%
Joel Hefley 86%
Wally Herger, Jr. 86%
Stephanie Herseth Sandlin 71%
Maurice Hinchey 50%
David Lee Hobson 71%
Pete Hoekstra 86%
Thomas Holden 86%
Rush Holt, Jr. 43%
Darlene Hooley 86%
John Nathan Hostettler 100%
Kenny Hulshof 86%
Duncan Hunter 86%
Kay Hutchison 75%
Henry Hyde 100%
Bob Inglis, Sr. 86%
Daniel Inouye 0%
Ernest Istook, Jr. 86%
Jesse Jackson, Jr. 57%
William Jefferson 57%
James Merrill Jeffords 0%
William Lewis Jenkins 86%
Nancy Johnson 71%
Tim Johnson 86%
Timothy Johnson 0%
Paul Kanjorski 86%
Ric Keller 86%
Sue Kelly 86%
Edward Kennedy, Sr. 0%
Mark Kennedy 71%
Patrick Kennedy 57%
Dale Kildee 57%
Carolyn Kilpatrick 50%
Jack Kingston 86%
Joseph Knollenberg 71%
Herb Kohl 0%
James Kolbe 71%
Dennis Kucinich 43%
John Kuhl, Jr. 86%
Jon Kyl 75%
Ray LaHood 71%
Mary Landrieu 0%
Tom Lantos 50%
Tom Latham 71%
Steve LaTourette 71%
Frank Lautenberg 0%
James Leach 71%
Carl Levin 0%
Jerry Lewis 86%
Ron Lewis 86%
Joe Lieberman 0%
Blanche Lincoln 0%
John Linder 86%
Trent Lott, Sr. 75%
Dick Lugar 0%
Dan Lungren 86%
Connie Mack IV 86%
Don Manzullo 86%
Jim Marshall 86%
Melquiades Martinez 0%
Jim Matheson 86%
Carolyn McCarthy 71%
Thaddeus McCotter 100%
James McCrery III 86%
John McHugh 100%
Mike McIntyre 86%
Buck McKeon 86%
Cynthia Ann McKinney 43%
Michael McNulty 71%
Martin Meehan 43%
Kendrick Meek, Sr. 57%
Charlie Melancon, Sr. 71%
Mike Michaud 57%
Juanita Millender-McDonald 50%
Gary Miller 86%
George Miller 43%
Brad Miller 57%
Alan Mollohan 57%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top